X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

34-153-22881

Well Details

Well ID: 34-153-22881
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: <County>
Municipality:
Operator Name: BASS ENERGY CO INC
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: SUMMA UNIT
License Status: Final Restoration
License Date: 2007-12-14
Spud Date: 1998-07-17
Spud Drilling Contractor: MOHAWK DRLG
Final Drill Date: 1998-07-26
Well Total Depth: 4085.00 ft
Configuration: Directional
Latitude: 41.080000
Longitude: -81.500000

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
APP 1998-06-12 Proposed Formations:CLINTON, Issued Date:6/12/98, Expired Date:6/12/99 6:00:00 AM, Drilling unit acres:20, Proposed Well Type:OG, Proposed Well Class:POOL
Original Spud 1998-07-17
Completed 1998-07-26
Reached Total Depth 1998-07-26
Completion Report Received 1998-08-24
Correction to Well 2001-02-02 CHANGE IN TARGET INFORMATION: FOOTAGE= 6550'NL & 2840'EL OF TWP ( IN TRACT 7); X= 2,275,400 AND Y= 516,480
APP 2007-12-14 Proposed Formations:CLINTON, Issued Date:12/14/2007, Expired Date:12/13/2008 6:00:00 AM, Drilling unit acres:20, Proposed Well Type:OG, Proposed Well Class:
Plugged/Abandoned 2008-03-05
Construction Permit Expires 2008-12-13
Record Last Modified 2017-02-15

For data sources see[2]

Perforation Treatments

Perforation Date Interval Top (ft) Interval Base (ft) Number of Shots
1998-10-27 3887 3916 51
3887 3916 51
3887 3916 51

For data sources see[3]

Stimulations Data

Stimulation Date Chemical Agent Chemical Agent Concentration (%) Fracking Fluid Volume Mass of Proppant Used (lb) Fracking Company Comments
H2O 15 48250 Gal 70000 600 GALLONS HCL ACID

For data sources see[4]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Oil Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1999 BASS ENERGY CO INC 0.00 668.00 208
2000 BASS ENERGY CO INC 8472.00 296.00 365
2001 BASS ENERGY CO INC 0.00 129.00 365
2002 BASS ENERGY CO INC 4383.00 186.00 365
2003 BASS ENERGY CO INC 4424.00 101.00 365
2004 BASS ENERGY CO INC 4419.00 89.00 365
2005 BASS ENERGY CO INC 4007.00 96.00 365
2006 BASS ENERGY CO INC 4421.00 82.00 365
2007 BASS ENERGY CO INC 2689.00 87.00 365
2008 BASS ENERGY CO INC 0.00 56.00 365

For data sources see[5] [6]

Waste Data

Period Operator Name Waste Type Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1999 BASS ENERGY CO INC Brine 458 208
2000 BASS ENERGY CO INC Brine 135 365
2001 BASS ENERGY CO INC Brine 0 365
2002 BASS ENERGY CO INC Brine 40 365
2003 BASS ENERGY CO INC Brine 50 365
2004 BASS ENERGY CO INC Brine 45 365
2005 BASS ENERGY CO INC Brine 55 365
2006 BASS ENERGY CO INC Brine 40 365
2007 BASS ENERGY CO INC Brine 0 365
2008 BASS ENERGY CO INC Brine 0 365

For data sources see[7] [8]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
0224825222 2008-12-30 Plug / Plug Back No Violations The well was plugged and abandoned on March 5, 2008. The tank battery has been dismantled but the location has not been restored and the wellhead is still visible. The area in question is being redeveloped as part of a hospital expansion and will not be restored until that phase of construction is completed.
0743953962 2016-05-19 Plug / Plug Back No Violations I was on the the site of the Summa # 1-D ( P&A in 2008 ) to meet with Robert Kroupa ( Director of Facilites Construction ) and Mike Wohlwend ( Wohlwend Engineering ) to review Summas construction plans for the site on which the well was located. My inspection revealed that the wellhead was sticking up above grade. There were not any indications of any leakage from the wellhead. Mr. Kroupa previously had asked what requirements that DOGRM had regarding construction over a plugged and abandoned well. I replied that while DOGRM did not have any rules or requirements addressing such it is advised that the placement of a structure over a plugged well should be avoided, if possible. We discussed the placement of a vaulted and venting system over the well. I suggested that Mr. Kroupa contact a Engineering firm familiar with construction and operation of such a system. Mr. Kroupa said, that it is possilble that the new construction could be oriented to miss the plugged well by a few feet. It was agreed by all that this avenue would be the best remedy. I suggested that even if the plugged is outside the confines of the structure that it be vaulted and vented above the roof level. I requested that they contact me as future plans develop.
1374695746 2013-07-24 Final Restoration No Violations No indication of well equipment, access road, or tank battery.
2114254430 2017-08-24 Final Restoration No Violations I was on the Summa # 1- D location to observe the cutting off of the 8.625 surface casing and installation of the permanent concrete vault. Moore Well Services was the contactor for this procedure engaged by Donley / Shook ( General Contractors for Summa Medical System ). The well was originally plugged in March of 2008. The plugging involved four (4) cement plugs across various depth intervals in the borehole and a wireline bridge plug in the 8.625 surface casing. The 8.625 surface casing was cut off approximately two (2) feet above the excavated grade. Brandon Williams ( Rettew Engineering ) was testing and documenting the casing stump for any gas migration. After the surface cement sheath was removed, from the casing, Mr. Williams also monitored the remnant cement for any migration. No gas was detected. A gravel pad approximately 12 thick was placed down and graded. A prefab concrete catch basin was lowered over the casing and leveled. A concrete lid was placed on top of the basin and sealed. The vault will have two (2) vent line opened to the outside of the structure. The first was connected, via a dresser sleeve , to the 8.625 surface casing directly and sealed. The second will monitor the ambient air in the vault for any leakage. An identifying cap ( ODNR and permit number ) was attached to the 8.625 casing. This data was also welded onto the steel manhole lid which was to be visible after the cement pour of the basement floor. This plugged and abandoned well was in compliance with the Final Restoration criteria and passed. No violations identified during this inspection.
224825222 2008-12-30 0:00 PB No Violations
743953962 2016-5-19 0:00: PB No Violations

For data sources see[9]

References

  1. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Well, tblLocational, tblPlugWell, tblInspection, tblCivilTownships and tblPad Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  2. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Well and WellHistry Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  3. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Perfs Table". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  4. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - tblStimulation Table". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  5. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Oil and Gas Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  6. ↑ "Combined Production - Oil and Gas Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  7. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Brine Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  8. ↑ "Combined Production - Brine Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  9. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - tblInspection, tblInspFail and tblinspFlDesc Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
Retrieved from "https://wellwiki-prod.cloud.arc.gwu.edu/index.php?title=34-153-22881&oldid=14165764"