X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

Difference between revisions of "34-073-21899"

m
 
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
__TOC__
+
__TOC__
 
== Well Details ==
 
== Well Details ==
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
| Well ID: 34-073-21899
 
| Well ID: 34-073-21899
−
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 39.5487970679, -82.3452230049 | width=100% | height=100% }}
+
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="17" | {{#display_map: 39.54, -82.34 | width=100% | height=100% }}
 
|-
 
|-
−
| County:
+
| Country: United States
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Municipality:
+
| State: Ohio
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Operator Name:
+
| County: [[Hocking_County,_Ohio|Hocking]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Well Pad ID:
+
| Municipality: [[Green_Township,_Hocking_County,_Ohio|Green Township]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Farm/Lease Name:
+
| Operator Name: [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| First Permit Date:
+
| Well Pad ID:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Last Permit Date:
+
| Farm/Lease Name: NUTTER LOWELL
 +
|-
 +
| License Status: Producing
 +
|-
 +
| License Date: 1976-06-10
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Spud Date: 1976-06-01
 
| Spud Date: 1976-06-01
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Unconventional:
+
| Spud Drilling Contractor:  
 +
|-
 +
| Final Drill Date: 1976-10-08
 +
|-
 +
| Well Total Depth: 2850.00 ft
 +
|-
 +
| Configuration: Vertical
 +
|-
 +
| Latitude: 39.540000
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Horizontal:
+
| Longitude: -82.340000
 +
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Risk Based Data Management System - Well, tblLocational, tblPlugWell, tblInspection, tblCivilTownships and tblPad Tables
 +
|publisher = [[Ohio Department of Natural Resources]]
 +
| date =  2020-11-16
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources
 +
| accessdate = 2020-11-16 }}</ref>
 +
== Well History ==
 +
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Well Status
 +
!scope="col" style="width: 15%;text-align: center"| Well Status Date
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Comment
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Producing: No
+
| Original Spud
 +
| 1976-06-01
 +
| 
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Violations: 18
+
| CO
 +
| 1976-06-10
 +
| 566  GRIM PAUL A  GeoDate  6/10/76
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Latitude: 39.5487970679
+
| Completed
 +
| 1976-10-08
 +
| 
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Longitude: -82.3452230049
+
| Reached Total Depth
 +
| 1976-10-08
 +
| 
 +
|-
 +
| Change of Owner
 +
| 2001-10-29
 +
| Operator changed from 566, GRIM PAUL A to 5755, CHIEFTAIN ENERGY CORP.
 +
|-
 +
| Record Last Modified
 +
| 2013-10-03
 +
| 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Risk Based Data Management System - Well and WellHistry Tables
 +
|publisher = [[Ohio Department of Natural Resources]]
 +
| date = 2020-11-16
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources
 +
| accessdate = 2020-11-16 }}</ref>
 +
<!--== Perforation Treatments ==
 +
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Perforation Date
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Interval Top (ft)
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Interval Base (ft)
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Number of Shots
 +
|-
 +
|}-->
 +
<!--== Fracking Activities ==
 +
==== Fracking Jobs ====
 +
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Job Number
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Job Start Date
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Job End Date
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| True Vertical Depth (ft)
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Total Water Volume (gal)
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Total Non-Water Volume (gal)
 +
|-
 +
|}-->
 +
<!--==== Fluid Composition Data ====
 +
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: 100%"
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Job Number
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Trade Name
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Supplier
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Purpose
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Ingredient Name
 +
!scope="col" style="white-space: nowrap;text-align: center"| CAS Number
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Additive Percentage by Mass
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Job Percentage by Mass
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Mass Used (lb)
 +
|-
 +
|}-->
 +
== Stimulations Data ==
 +
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Stimulation Date
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Chemical Agent
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Chemical Agent Concentration (%)
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Fracking Fluid Volume
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Mass of Proppant Used (lb)
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Fracking Company
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Comments
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
| H2O
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 5500 Bbl
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 20000
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Risk Based Data Management System - tblStimulation Table
 +
|publisher = [[Ohio Department of Natural Resources]]
 +
| date =  2020-11-16
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources
 +
| accessdate = 2020-11-16 }}</ref>
 
== Production Data ==
 
== Production Data ==
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
−
!scope="col" | PERIOD
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Period
−
!scope="col" | GAS QUANTITY
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Operator Name
−
!scope="col" | GAS PRODUCTION DAYS
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Gas Quantity (mcf)
−
!scope="col" | CONDENSATE QUANTITY
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Oil Quantity (bbl)
−
!scope="col" | CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Production Days
−
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
+
|-
−
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
+
| 1984
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 2404.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 396.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1985
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 1796.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 529.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1986
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 755.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 270.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1987
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 953.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 198.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1988
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 103.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 80.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1989
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 66.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 40.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1990
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 59.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 256.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1991
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 509.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 225.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1992
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 942.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 210.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1993
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 520.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 73.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1994
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 1015.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 102.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1995
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 302.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 77.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1996
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 256.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 120.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1997
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 148.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 22.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1998
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 47.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1999
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2000
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 124.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2001
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 14.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2002
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
 +
|-
 +
| 2003
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 9.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 65
 +
|-
 +
| 2004
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 7.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2005
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2006
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 12.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2007
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 38.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2008
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 38.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2009
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 38.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2010
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 26.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
 +
|-
 +
| 2011
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 54.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2012
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 54.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 366
 +
|-
 +
| 2013
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 84.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2014
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 54.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2015
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 27.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2016
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 16.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2017
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 16.00
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Oil and Gas Data
 +
|publisher = [[Ohio Department of Natural Resources]]
 +
| date =  2020-11-16
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources
 +
| accessdate = 2020-11-16 }}</ref>
 +
<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Combined Production - Oil and Gas Data
 +
|publisher = [[Ohio Department of Natural Resources]]
 +
| date = 2020-11-16
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources
 +
| accessdate = 2020-11-16 }}</ref>
 
== Waste Data ==
 
== Waste Data ==
−
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
+
{| class="wikitable sortable"
−
!scope="col" | PERIOD
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Period
−
!scope="col" | TYPE
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Operator Name
−
!scope="col" | QUANTITY
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Waste Type
−
!scope="col" | UNITS
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Quantity (bbl)
−
!scope="col" | DISPOSAL METHOD
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Production Days
−
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID
+
|-
−
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY NAME
+
| 1984
−
!scope="col" | FACILITY CITY
+
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
−
!scope="col" | FACILITY STATE
+
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1985
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1986
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1987
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1988
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1989
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1990
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1991
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1992
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 28
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1993
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 44
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1994
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 80
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1995
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 140
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1996
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 480
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1997
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 56
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1998
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 40
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 1999
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2000
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 140
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2001
 +
| [[GRIM PAUL A]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 70
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2002
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
 +
|-
 +
| 2003
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 110
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 65
 +
|-
 +
| 2004
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 42
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2005
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2006
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 62
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2007
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 30
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2008
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 30
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2009
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 30
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2010
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 24
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
 +
|-
 +
| 2011
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 38
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2012
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 300
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 366
 +
|-
 +
| 2013
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 238
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2014
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 322
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2015
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 26
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2016
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 25
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 +
| 2017
 +
| [[HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL]]
 +
| Brine
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 25
 +
| style="text-align: right;" | 365
 +
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Brine Data
 +
|publisher = [[Ohio Department of Natural Resources]]
 +
| date =  2020-11-16
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources
 +
| accessdate = 2020-11-16 }}</ref>
 +
<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Combined Production - Brine Data
 +
|publisher = [[Ohio Department of Natural Resources]]
 +
| date = 2020-11-16
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources
 +
| accessdate = 2020-11-16 }}</ref>
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
== Inspection Data ==
 +
==== Inspections Performed ====
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
−
!scope="col" | INSPECTION ID
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Inspection ID
−
!scope="col" | DATE
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Inspection Date
−
!scope="col" | DESCRIPTION
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Inspection Type
−
!scope="col" | COMMENT
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Inspection Result
−
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Inspection Comments
−
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE
 
−
!scope="col" | VIOLATION_COMMENT
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| -1280009483
 
| -1280009483
−
| 2009-04-27
+
| 2009-4-27 0:00:
−
|
+
| PW
−
| Chieftain Energy Contractor, Mr. Ron McBride called by telephone today and stated that the dike had been pumped.  A follow-up inspection revealed that the dike has been pumped, but contamination and pollution still remains in the dike.  The separator still needs to be repaired, due to a bad dump valve.  Due to a lack of rainfall events, the earthen dike was again evaluated to ensure that it was not leaking.  During the inspection, it was noted that the dike would need to be repaired.  High Range Quantabs (Titrators for Chloride) were utilized at three locations.  Two locations inside the dike measure 2.8 and 3.8 units, which equals 538 and 899 ppm (mg/l) Cl- respectively. A location behind the dike contained a bare area with deer tracks measuring approximately 20' x 100'.  A titrator placed near the beginning edge of this bare area showed a value of 4.2 units, 1079 ppm (mg/l) Cl- .  Note: A nearby creek is approximately 300' from this location.  The trench along the edge of the field allows water to drain offsite and into the creek.  A titrator placed near.  Chieftain Energy will be contacted regarding this inspection.
+
| No Violations
−
|
+
|
−
| 9-9-05(A)8
+
|-
−
|
+
| -1302859697
 +
| 2010-12-3 0:00:
 +
| PW
 +
| No Violations
 +
| 0.50
 +
|-
 +
| -1394834397
 +
| 2018-7-31 0:00:
 +
| PW
 +
| No Violations
 +
| 0.10
 +
|-
 +
| -162585293
 +
| 2018-4-13 0:00:
 +
| PW
 +
| No Violations
 +
| 0.20
 +
|-
 +
| -1649180289
 +
| 2006-10-18 0:00
 +
| PW
 +
| No Violations
 +
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| -175437051
 +
| 2012-11-15 0:00
 +
| PW
 +
| No Violations
 +
| 1.00
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -1280009483
+
| -2078785054
−
| 2009-04-27
+
| 2009-5-6 0:00:0
−
|
+
| PW
−
| Chieftain Energy Contractor, Mr. Ron McBride called by telephone today and stated that the dike had been pumped.  A follow-up inspection revealed that the dike has been pumped, but contamination and pollution still remains in the dike.  The separator still needs to be repaired, due to a bad dump valve.  Due to a lack of rainfall events, the earthen dike was again evaluated to ensure that it was not leaking.  During the inspection, it was noted that the dike would need to be repaired.  High Range Quantabs (Titrators for Chloride) were utilized at three locations.  Two locations inside the dike measure 2.8 and 3.8 units, which equals 538 and 899 ppm (mg/l) Cl- respectively.  A location behind the dike contained a bare area with deer tracks measuring approximately 20' x 100'.  A titrator placed near the beginning edge of this bare area showed a value of 4.2 units, 1079 ppm (mg/l) Cl- .  Note: A nearby creek is approximately 300' from this location.  The trench along the edge of the field allows water to drain offsite and into the creek.  A titrator placed near.  Chieftain Energy will be contacted regarding this inspection.
+
| No Violations
−
|
+
|  
−
| 9-9-05(A)9
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| -354994637
 +
| 2006-12-22 0:00
 +
| PW
 +
| No Violations
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -1302859697
+
| -383899726
−
| 2010-12-03
+
| 2004-3-17 0:00:
−
|
+
| PW
−
| An inspection revealed small gas leak around polish rod liner.  The liner leans to one side, as pumping unit does not appear to be level.  Valves were observed open and well pumps into a shared tank battery.  At time of the inspection, no statements of production have been submitted to the Division since 2006.  Chieftain Energy Corp. is currently addressing this deficiency for the years 2007-2009 on all wells.
+
| No Violations
−
|
+
|  
−
|
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| -510898090
 +
| 2012-11-5 0:00:
 +
| PW
 +
| No Violations
 +
| 4.00
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -1649180289
+
| 0060443639
−
| 2006-10-18
+
| 2003-12-23
−
|
+
| Production Wells
−
| A complaint was received alleging that the Parley and Lowell Nutter wells are idle.  According to the owner of Chieftain Energy, Mr. Doug Kitchen, and the landowner, Mr. Lowell Nutter all seven wells are tied into each other to produce house gas.  Mr. Nutter states that little gas is obtained from these wells.  Mr. Kitchen admitted that a few wells need some work.  Mr. Kitchen will be given credit for 1 well since some house gas is generated.  The other 6 wells must be plugged or produced.  Mr. Kitchen was given a verbal NOV on 10/18/2006.
+
| No Violations
−
|
+
| Follow-up on NOV, Non-Compliance, company has not complied with NOV.   1/12/04 to date company has not complied with NOV and corrected violations, turned over to management.
−
| NONE
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| 0162585293
 +
| 2018-04-13
 +
| Production Wells
 +
| No Violations
 +
| My inspection revealed the well consists of a pumping unit, vertical separator, 2-100 barrel tanks, 1-20 barrel tank and gas sales meter. This well shares a common tank battery with 3407322037. Legible identification was posted.
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -175437051
+
| 0175437051
 
| 2012-11-15
 
| 2012-11-15
−
|
+
| Production Wells
 +
| No Violations
 
| The dike was full of water.  Mr. Bill Wray stated that it had been sucked out with the water truck, but it continues to fill up.  He also said that efforts will be made to remedy the problem, but it could be a combination of rain and the fact that the tank battery is in a low lying area.  Neither of the tanks have been losing fluid.  Clean-up has been performed around the well head.  The leaky valve has also been fixed.
 
| The dike was full of water.  Mr. Bill Wray stated that it had been sucked out with the water truck, but it continues to fill up.  He also said that efforts will be made to remedy the problem, but it could be a combination of rain and the fact that the tank battery is in a low lying area.  Neither of the tanks have been losing fluid.  Clean-up has been performed around the well head.  The leaky valve has also been fixed.
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
−
|-
 
−
| -2078785054
 
−
| 2009-05-06
 
−
|
 
−
| A follow-up inspection revealed non-compliance.  It was noted however, that equipment has been placed on-site to begin working towards achieving compliance.
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| 0216973396
 +
| 2009-04-29
 +
| Administrative Inspection
 +
| No Violations
 +
| Contacted Mr. Ron McBride at 1:36 PM, Chieftain Energy Contractor, on cell phone, and was instructed to repair the earthen dike around the tank battery.  Quantabs had shown chlorides inside and outside the earthen dike.  Mr. McBride was given two options for contaminated soil: remove contaminated soil, new topsoil, seed and mulch or bioremediation to include fertilizer, lime, seed and mulch.  Mr. McBride agreed to repair the dike and has opted to perform bioremediation.
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -354994637
+
| 0354994637
 
| 2006-12-22
 
| 2006-12-22
−
|
+
| Production Wells
 +
| No Violations
 
| A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has been resolved.  The well was observed pumping with no signs of mechanical problems.
 
| A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has been resolved.  The well was observed pumping with no signs of mechanical problems.
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
−
|-
+
| 0383899726
−
| -383899726
 
 
| 2004-03-17
 
| 2004-03-17
−
|
+
| Production Wells
 +
| No Violations
 
| Follow-up, In-Compliance.
 
| Follow-up, In-Compliance.
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| 0420304997
 +
| 2011-10-05
 +
| Production Wells
 +
| Violations Noted
 +
| A follow up inspection revealed that there was a flow line leaking gas and blowing bubbles into a pool of fluid outside of the dike.  The kill zone caused the pool of fluid  was approximately 12 by 35.  The fluid was tested with High Range Quantab titrators it registered 8.6 which is 5912 ppm (mg/L) chloride.  There was no oil sheen on the fluid.  There was also an abundance of fluid inside of the dike.  Met Ron McBride, and Doug Kitchen in the field.  They attempted to fix the leak, but werent able to, so they shut the valve and will fix it when the clean up of the contaminated material takes place.  Ron and Doug were given a week to remove contaminated soil, and get dike sucked out.  If complied with by the extension date, company may take contaminated soil back to their shop for bioremediation.  If not, contaminated soil will have to be disposed of in an EPA approved landfill.
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -510898090
+
| 0510898090
 
| 2012-11-05
 
| 2012-11-05
−
|
+
| Production Wells
−
| FOLLOW UP TO NOV #  1352148423 Received phone call from Mike Sherron (OEPA) on Sunday 11/4/12 at 5:45 pm stating that the dike for the tank battery had over flown, there was a valve bubbling gas inside the dike, there was a slight oil sheen and that he had deployed an absorbent boom across the point of escape.  When I arrived on site I observed the dike full of fluid, and the boom deployed.  There was a very slight oil sheen, and small amounts of residual oil on top of the water.  The boom had only thin stripes of contamination on it.  The point of escape for the water was a low place in the dike that hadn't been completely closed after work had been done on the tank battery.  The valve was that was reported as bubbling was indeed bubbling. I tested the water for chlorides in three places: inside the dike, just outside the dike, and in a pool of water 20 yards away.  The water inside the dike registered a 4.2 on the High Range Quantab which means there were 787 parts per million chlorides in it.  Both quantabs on the outside of the dike did not register enough chlorides to quantify.  I spoke with Mr. Bill Wray, explained to him the situation, and gave him instructions to empty the dike of any fluid.  He stated that it would be done this evening. As far as fixing the bubbling valve and the low spot on the dike, that would be taken care of later this week.  I also brought to his attention remedial clean-up needed around the well head.  He stated that that will also be taken care of this week.  Photos were taken at the time of inspection.  Spoke with property owner Lowell Nutter during inspection.
+
| No Violations
−
|
+
| FOLLOW UP TO NOV #  1352148423 Received phone call from Mike Sherron (OEPA) on Sunday 11/4/12 at 5:45 pm stating that the dike for the tank battery had over flown, there was a valve bubbling gas inside the dike, there was a slight oil sheen and that he had deployed an absorbent boom across the point of escape.  When I arrived on site I observed the dike full of fluid, and the boom deployed.  There was a very slight oil sheen, and small amounts of residual oil on top of the water.  The boom had only thin stripes of contamination on it.  The point of escape for the water was a low place in the dike that hadnt been completely closed after work had been done on the tank battery.  The valve was that was reported as bubbling was indeed bubbling. I tested the water for chlorides in three places: inside the dike, just outside the dike, and in a pool of water 20 yards away.  The water inside the dike registered a 4.2 on the High Range Quantab which means there were 787 parts per million chlorides in it.  Both quantabs on the outside of the dike did not register enough chlorides to quantify.  I spoke with Mr. Bill Wray, explained to him the situation, and gave him instructions to empty the dike of any fluid.  He stated that it would be done this evening. As far as fixing the bubbling valve and the low spot on the dike, that would be taken care of later this week.  I also brought to his attention remedial clean-up needed around the well head.  He stated that that will also be taken care of this week.  Photos were taken at the time of inspection.  Spoke with property owner Lowell Nutter during inspection.
−
|
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| 0695121107
 +
| 2013-11-25
 +
| Production Wells
 +
| No Violations
 +
| Compliance notice follow up, the dike is empty and the contamination has been cleaned up. This satisfies the compliance notice.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1155927171
 
| 1155927171
 
| 2006-08-09
 
| 2006-08-09
−
|
+
| Production Wells
 +
| Violations Noted
 
| An inspection was conducted at the facility owned by Chieftain Energy Corp on 8/9/2006.  During the inspection, it was noted that the well utilized a common tank battery and no ID was observed at the well.  Also noted was that the oily soil needs to be removed from the lease.
 
| An inspection was conducted at the facility owned by Chieftain Energy Corp on 8/9/2006.  During the inspection, it was noted that the well utilized a common tank battery and no ID was observed at the well.  Also noted was that the oily soil needs to be removed from the lease.
−
|
 
−
| 9-1-07
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
−
|-
 
−
| 1155927171
 
−
| 2006-08-09
 
−
|
 
−
| An inspection was conducted at the facility owned by Chieftain Energy Corp on 8/9/2006.  During the inspection, it was noted that the well utilized a common tank battery and no ID was observed at the well.  Also noted was that the oily soil needs to be removed from the lease.
 
−
|
 
−
| 9-9-05(A)10
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1239281417
 
| 1239281417
 
| 2009-03-18
 
| 2009-03-18
−
|
+
| Production Wells
 +
| Violations Noted
 
| An inspection revealed contamination and pollution near the well and inside the earthen dike.  The dike has reached maximum capacity of fluid and was also found to contain oil.  The source of the leak is from a separator inside the dike and two fittings on the bottom of (2) separate 100 bbl tanks showed signs of leakage (stains).  The tank battery is located in a low lying area at the edge of a pasture field, and road located approximately 300 feet away from a nearby creek.  At the time of the inspection, the area surrounding the well and tank battery location remain wet, due to rainfall events, and runoff from nearby road.  The earthen dike may be leaking and will be evaluated when the surrounding area begins to dry.  Quantabs (High Range) placed at locations showed no signs of accelerated chloride.  No oil sheen was observed outside the dike.  Near the well location, old parrafin was observed on the ground surface and will need to be removed.  Note: The company was informed of the inspection results, in the field, and also by telephone to include that the dike may be leaking and will be evaluated.
 
| An inspection revealed contamination and pollution near the well and inside the earthen dike.  The dike has reached maximum capacity of fluid and was also found to contain oil.  The source of the leak is from a separator inside the dike and two fittings on the bottom of (2) separate 100 bbl tanks showed signs of leakage (stains).  The tank battery is located in a low lying area at the edge of a pasture field, and road located approximately 300 feet away from a nearby creek.  At the time of the inspection, the area surrounding the well and tank battery location remain wet, due to rainfall events, and runoff from nearby road.  The earthen dike may be leaking and will be evaluated when the surrounding area begins to dry.  Quantabs (High Range) placed at locations showed no signs of accelerated chloride.  No oil sheen was observed outside the dike.  Near the well location, old parrafin was observed on the ground surface and will need to be removed.  Note: The company was informed of the inspection results, in the field, and also by telephone to include that the dike may be leaking and will be evaluated.
−
|
 
−
| 9-1-07
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| 1280009483
 +
| 2009-04-27
 +
| Production Wells
 +
| Violations Noted
 +
| Chieftain Energy Contractor, Mr. Ron McBride called by telephone today and stated that the dike had been pumped.  A follow-up inspection revealed that the dike has been pumped, but contamination and pollution still remains in the dike.  The separator still needs to be repaired, due to a bad dump valve.  Due to a lack of rainfall events, the earthen dike was again evaluated to ensure that it was not leaking.  During the inspection, it was noted that the dike would need to be repaired.  High Range Quantabs (Titrators for Chloride) were utilized at three locations.  Two locations inside the dike measure 2.8 and 3.8 units, which equals 538 and 899 ppm (mg/l) Cl- respectively.  A location behind the dike contained a bare area with deer tracks measuring approximately 20 x 100.  A titrator placed near the beginning edge of this bare area showed a value of 4.2 units, 1079 ppm (mg/l) Cl- .  Note: A nearby creek is approximately 300 from this location.  The trench along the edge of the field allows water to drain offsite and into the creek.  A titrator placed near.  Chieftain Energy will be contacted regarding this inspection.
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 1239281417
+
| 1302859697
−
| 2009-03-18
+
| 2010-12-03
−
|
+
| Production Wells
−
| An inspection revealed contamination and pollution near the well and inside the earthen dike.  The dike has reached maximum capacity of fluid and was also found to contain oil.  The source of the leak is from a separator inside the dike and two fittings on the bottom of (2) separate 100 bbl tanks showed signs of leakage (stains).  The tank battery is located in a low lying area at the edge of a pasture field, and road located approximately 300 feet away from a nearby creek.  At the time of the inspection, the area surrounding the well and tank battery location remain wet, due to rainfall events, and runoff from nearby road.  The earthen dike may be leaking and will be evaluated when the surrounding area begins to dry.  Quantabs (High Range) placed at locations showed no signs of accelerated chloride. No oil sheen was observed outside the dike.  Near the well location, old parrafin was observed on the ground surface and will need to be removed.  Note: The company was informed of the inspection results, in the field, and also by telephone to include that the dike may be leaking and will be evaluated.
+
| No Violations
−
|
+
| An inspection revealed small gas leak around polish rod liner.  The liner leans to one side, as pumping unit does not appear to be level.  Valves were observed open and well pumps into a shared tank battery.  At time of the inspection, no statements of production have been submitted to the Division since 2006.  Chieftain Energy Corp. is currently addressing this deficiency for the years 2007-2009 on all wells.
−
| 9-9-05(A)9
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1302906523
 
| 1302906523
 
| 2009-05-11
 
| 2009-05-11
−
|
+
| Production Wells
−
| A follow-up inspection revealed that dike drain was releasing fluid from the dike.  Oil was observed inside the dike.  Outside the dike a 5' x 3' section of oil was observed.  Quantabs showed acceptable amount of Cl- in fluid.  Contacted Chieftain Energy and instructed to install dike and apply absorbent pads to areas that contain contamination and pollution.  The equipment that had previously been observed has now been removed from the location.  The dike does not show signs of being repaired only installed drain.
+
| No Violations
−
|
+
| A follow-up inspection revealed that dike drain was releasing fluid from the dike.  Oil was observed inside the dike.  Outside the dike a 5 x 3 section of oil was observed.  Quantabs showed acceptable amount of Cl- in fluid.  Contacted Chieftain Energy and instructed to install dike and apply absorbent pads to areas that contain contamination and pollution.  The equipment that had previously been observed has now been removed from the location.  The dike does not show signs of being repaired only installed drain.
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1312898085
 
| 1312898085
 
| 2011-08-02
 
| 2011-08-02
−
|
+
| Production Wells
 +
| Violations Noted
 
| An inspection of the tank battery and separator revealed two violations.  There was water in the tank battery that when tested with high range Quantab titrators, completely maxed them out.  The chloride content is greater than 6765 ppm (mg/L).  Water needs to be removed, and the soil underneath also needs to be removed and hauled away.  Gas was being vented from a pop-off valve on top of the separator.  This needs to be corrected, or a flare needs to be constructed as per OAC 1501:9-9-05(B).  Property owner receives house gas.
 
| An inspection of the tank battery and separator revealed two violations.  There was water in the tank battery that when tested with high range Quantab titrators, completely maxed them out.  The chloride content is greater than 6765 ppm (mg/L).  Water needs to be removed, and the soil underneath also needs to be removed and hauled away.  Gas was being vented from a pop-off valve on top of the separator.  This needs to be corrected, or a flare needs to be constructed as per OAC 1501:9-9-05(B).  Property owner receives house gas.
−
|
 
−
| 9-1-07
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
−
|-
 
−
| 1312898085
 
−
| 2011-08-02
 
−
|
 
−
| An inspection of the tank battery and separator revealed two violations.  There was water in the tank battery that when tested with high range Quantab titrators, completely maxed them out.  The chloride content is greater than 6765 ppm (mg/L).  Water needs to be removed, and the soil underneath also needs to be removed and hauled away.  Gas was being vented from a pop-off valve on top of the separator.  This needs to be corrected, or a flare needs to be constructed as per OAC 1501:9-9-05(B).  Property owner receives house gas.
 
−
|
 
−
| 9-9-05(B)
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1318531411
 
| 1318531411
 
| 2011-10-12
 
| 2011-10-12
−
|
+
| Production Wells
 +
| No Violations
 
| Well not in compliance.  Flow-line leak had been fixed.  No contamination removed.  Tank battery not sucked out.  Met with Doug Kitchen and Ron McBride and extended the deadline by one week.  They were amidst a business move.  If complied with by the extension date, company may take contaminated soil back to their shop for bioremediation.  If not, contaminated soil will have to be disposed of in an EPA approved landfill.
 
| Well not in compliance.  Flow-line leak had been fixed.  No contamination removed.  Tank battery not sucked out.  Met with Doug Kitchen and Ron McBride and extended the deadline by one week.  They were amidst a business move.  If complied with by the extension date, company may take contaminated soil back to their shop for bioremediation.  If not, contaminated soil will have to be disposed of in an EPA approved landfill.
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
−
|-
 
−
| 1352148423
 
−
| 2012-11-05
 
−
|
 
−
| Received phone call from Mike Sherron (OEPA) on Sunday 11/4/12 at 5:45 pm stating that the dike for the tank battery had over flown, there was a valve bubbling gas inside the dike, there was a slight oil sheen and that he had deployed an absorbent boom across the point of escape.  When I arrived on site I observed the dike full of fluid, and the boom deployed.  There was a very slight oil sheen, and small amounts of residual oil on top of the water.  The boom had only thin stripes of contamination on it.  The point of escape for the water was a low place in the dike that hadn't been completely closed after work had been done on the tank battery.  The valve was that was reported as bubbling was indeed bubbling. I tested the water for chlorides in three places: inside the dike, just outside the dike, and in a pool of water 20 yards away.  The water inside the dike registered a 4.2 on the High Range Quantab which means there were 787 parts per million chlorides in it.  Both quantabs on the outside of the dike did not register enough chlorides to quantify.  I spoke with Mr. Bill Wray, explained to him the situation, and gave him instructions to empty the dike of any fluid.  He stated that it would be done this evening. As far as fixing the bubbling valve and the low spot on the dike, that would be taken care of later this week.  I also brought to his attention remedial clean-up needed around the well head.  He stated that that will also be taken care of this week.  Photos were taken at the time of inspection.  Spoke with property owner Lowell Nutter during inspection.
 
−
|
 
−
| 9-9-05(A)8
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
−
|-
 
−
| 1352148423
 
−
| 2012-11-05
 
−
|
 
−
| Received phone call from Mike Sherron (OEPA) on Sunday 11/4/12 at 5:45 pm stating that the dike for the tank battery had over flown, there was a valve bubbling gas inside the dike, there was a slight oil sheen and that he had deployed an absorbent boom across the point of escape.  When I arrived on site I observed the dike full of fluid, and the boom deployed.  There was a very slight oil sheen, and small amounts of residual oil on top of the water.  The boom had only thin stripes of contamination on it.  The point of escape for the water was a low place in the dike that hadn't been completely closed after work had been done on the tank battery.  The valve was that was reported as bubbling was indeed bubbling. I tested the water for chlorides in three places: inside the dike, just outside the dike, and in a pool of water 20 yards away.  The water inside the dike registered a 4.2 on the High Range Quantab which means there were 787 parts per million chlorides in it.  Both quantabs on the outside of the dike did not register enough chlorides to quantify.  I spoke with Mr. Bill Wray, explained to him the situation, and gave him instructions to empty the dike of any fluid.  He stated that it would be done this evening. As far as fixing the bubbling valve and the low spot on the dike, that would be taken care of later this week.  I also brought to his attention remedial clean-up needed around the well head.  He stated that that will also be taken care of this week.  Photos were taken at the time of inspection.  Spoke with property owner Lowell Nutter during inspection.
 
−
|
 
−
| NONE(B)
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1352148423
 
| 1352148423
 
| 2012-11-05
 
| 2012-11-05
−
|
+
| Production Wells
−
| Received phone call from Mike Sherron (OEPA) on Sunday 11/4/12 at 5:45 pm stating that the dike for the tank battery had over flown, there was a valve bubbling gas inside the dike, there was a slight oil sheen and that he had deployed an absorbent boom across the point of escape.  When I arrived on site I observed the dike full of fluid, and the boom deployed.  There was a very slight oil sheen, and small amounts of residual oil on top of the water.  The boom had only thin stripes of contamination on it.  The point of escape for the water was a low place in the dike that hadn't been completely closed after work had been done on the tank battery.  The valve was that was reported as bubbling was indeed bubbling. I tested the water for chlorides in three places: inside the dike, just outside the dike, and in a pool of water 20 yards away.  The water inside the dike registered a 4.2 on the High Range Quantab which means there were 787 parts per million chlorides in it.  Both quantabs on the outside of the dike did not register enough chlorides to quantify.  I spoke with Mr. Bill Wray, explained to him the situation, and gave him instructions to empty the dike of any fluid.  He stated that it would be done this evening. As far as fixing the bubbling valve and the low spot on the dike, that would be taken care of later this week.  I also brought to his attention remedial clean-up needed around the well head.  He stated that that will also be taken care of this week.  Photos were taken at the time of inspection.  Spoke with property owner Lowell Nutter during inspection.
+
| Violations Noted
−
|
+
| Received phone call from Mike Sherron (OEPA) on Sunday 11/4/12 at 5:45 pm stating that the dike for the tank battery had over flown, there was a valve bubbling gas inside the dike, there was a slight oil sheen and that he had deployed an absorbent boom across the point of escape.  When I arrived on site I observed the dike full of fluid, and the boom deployed.  There was a very slight oil sheen, and small amounts of residual oil on top of the water.  The boom had only thin stripes of contamination on it.  The point of escape for the water was a low place in the dike that hadnt been completely closed after work had been done on the tank battery.  The valve was that was reported as bubbling was indeed bubbling. I tested the water for chlorides in three places: inside the dike, just outside the dike, and in a pool of water 20 yards away.  The water inside the dike registered a 4.2 on the High Range Quantab which means there were 787 parts per million chlorides in it.  Both quantabs on the outside of the dike did not register enough chlorides to quantify.  I spoke with Mr. Bill Wray, explained to him the situation, and gave him instructions to empty the dike of any fluid.  He stated that it would be done this evening. As far as fixing the bubbling valve and the low spot on the dike, that would be taken care of later this week.  I also brought to his attention remedial clean-up needed around the well head.  He stated that that will also be taken care of this week.  Photos were taken at the time of inspection.  Spoke with property owner Lowell Nutter during inspection.
−
| NONE[C]
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| 1394834397
 +
| 2018-07-31
 +
| Production Wells
 +
| No Violations
 +
| My inspection revealed the well consists of a pumping unit, 2-100 barrel tanks,1-20 barrel tank and a vertical separator. Legible identification was posted.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1605632957
 
| 1605632957
 
| 2012-08-09
 
| 2012-08-09
−
|
+
| Production Wells
 +
| No Violations
 
| Witnessed efforts to re-plumb tank battery and replace flow lines.  Accompanied by inspector Morgan Button.
 
| Witnessed efforts to re-plumb tank battery and replace flow lines.  Accompanied by inspector Morgan Button.
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1619487256
 
| 1619487256
 
| 2009-04-23
 
| 2009-04-23
−
|
+
| Production Wells
 +
| No Violations
 
| A follow-up inspection conducted with Oil & Gas Supervisor, Mr. Robert Stonerock revealed non-compliance.  It was noted that the earthen dike still contains fluid and oil and the stuffing box rubbers may need to be repaired.
 
| A follow-up inspection conducted with Oil & Gas Supervisor, Mr. Robert Stonerock revealed non-compliance.  It was noted that the earthen dike still contains fluid and oil and the stuffing box rubbers may need to be repaired.
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| 1649180289
 +
| 2006-10-18
 +
| Production Wells
 +
| Violations Noted
 +
| A complaint was received alleging that the Parley and Lowell Nutter wells are idle.  According to the owner of Chieftain Energy, Mr. Doug Kitchen, and the landowner, Mr. Lowell Nutter all seven wells are tied into each other to produce house gas.  Mr. Nutter states that little gas is obtained from these wells.  Mr. Kitchen admitted that a few wells need some work.  Mr. Kitchen will be given credit for 1 well since some house gas is generated.  The other 6 wells must be plugged or produced.  Mr. Kitchen was given a verbal NOV on 10/18/2006.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1809874276
 
| 1809874276
 
| 2011-10-18
 
| 2011-10-18
−
|
+
| Production Wells
 +
| No Violations
 
| Witnessed clean-up efforts performed by Ron McBride, and Doug Kitchen.  Property owner Lowell Nutter was there as well.  Contaminated soil had been removed and stockpiled on location.  Mr. Kitchen and Mr. Nutter agreed on composting contaminated soil where it was stockpiled.  Mr. Nutter offered this as a solution.  Contaminated soil will be remediated by mixing horse or cow manure and lime with it and will be re-mixed approximately 6 months from now.  The soil will then be placed back in the area in which it came.
 
| Witnessed clean-up efforts performed by Ron McBride, and Doug Kitchen.  Property owner Lowell Nutter was there as well.  Contaminated soil had been removed and stockpiled on location.  Mr. Kitchen and Mr. Nutter agreed on composting contaminated soil where it was stockpiled.  Mr. Nutter offered this as a solution.  Contaminated soil will be remediated by mixing horse or cow manure and lime with it and will be re-mixed approximately 6 months from now.  The soil will then be placed back in the area in which it came.
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
−
|-
 
−
| 1858686454
 
−
| 2003-11-06
 
−
|
 
−
| An inspection of the well revealed No ID at the well, oily soil in dike around tank battery, production tanks leaking around bottoms, fittings and seams. Dike does not meet SPCC requirements, not large enough.  1/12/04  to date company has not complied with NOV and corrected violations, turned over to management.
 
−
|
 
−
| 9-1-07
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1858686454
 
| 1858686454
 
| 2003-11-06
 
| 2003-11-06
−
|
+
| Production Wells
 +
| Violations Noted
 
| An inspection of the well revealed No ID at the well, oily soil in dike around tank battery, production tanks leaking around bottoms, fittings and seams. Dike does not meet SPCC requirements, not large enough.  1/12/04  to date company has not complied with NOV and corrected violations, turned over to management.
 
| An inspection of the well revealed No ID at the well, oily soil in dike around tank battery, production tanks leaking around bottoms, fittings and seams. Dike does not meet SPCC requirements, not large enough.  1/12/04  to date company has not complied with NOV and corrected violations, turned over to management.
−
|
 
−
| 9-9-05(A)10
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
−
|-
 
−
| 1858686454
 
−
| 2003-11-06
 
−
|
 
−
| An inspection of the well revealed No ID at the well, oily soil in dike around tank battery, production tanks leaking around bottoms, fittings and seams. Dike does not meet SPCC requirements, not large enough.  1/12/04  to date company has not complied with NOV and corrected violations, turned over to management.
 
−
|
 
−
| 9-9-05(A)8
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
−
|-
 
−
| 1858686454
 
−
| 2003-11-06
 
−
|
 
−
| An inspection of the well revealed No ID at the well, oily soil in dike around tank battery, production tanks leaking around bottoms, fittings and seams. Dike does not meet SPCC requirements, not large enough.  1/12/04  to date company has not complied with NOV and corrected violations, turned over to management.
 
−
|
 
−
| 9-9-05(A)9
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1907206378
 
| 1907206378
 
| 2009-05-13
 
| 2009-05-13
−
|
+
| Production Wells
 +
| No Violations
 
| A follow-up inspection revealed that the oil has been cleaned up outside the dike.  A plug has been placed on location for drain pipe from the earthen dike.
 
| A follow-up inspection revealed that the oil has been cleaned up outside the dike.  A plug has been placed on location for drain pipe from the earthen dike.
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2047327363
 
| 2047327363
 
| 2009-04-29
 
| 2009-04-29
−
|
+
| Production Wells
 +
| No Violations
 
| Met with the landowner and Chieftain Energy Contractor,  Mr. Ron McBride regarding the violations and proposed plans to achieve compliance.
 
| Met with the landowner and Chieftain Energy Contractor,  Mr. Ron McBride regarding the violations and proposed plans to achieve compliance.
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| 2078785054
 +
| 2009-05-06
 +
| Production Wells
 +
| No Violations
 +
| A follow-up inspection revealed non-compliance.  It was noted however, that equipment has been placed on-site to begin working towards achieving compliance.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2094768041
 
| 2094768041
 
| 2012-12-04
 
| 2012-12-04
−
|
+
| Production Wells
 +
| No Violations
 
| Company was servicing well at the time of inspection.  Rods had been pulled, and tubing was being pulled.  Accompanied by Andrew Adgate and Steve Riley.
 
| Company was servicing well at the time of inspection.  Rods had been pulled, and tubing was being pulled.  Accompanied by Andrew Adgate and Steve Riley.
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| 216973396
 +
| 2009-4-29 0:00:
 +
| AM
 +
| No Violations
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| 420304997
 +
| 2011-10-5 0:00:
 +
| PW
 +
| No Violations
 +
| 3.00
 +
|-
 +
| 60443639
 +
| 2003-12-23 0:00
 +
| PW
 +
| No Violations
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| 695121107
 +
| 2013-11-25 0:00
 +
| PW
 +
| No Violations
 +
| 1.00
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 216973396
+
|}
−
| 2009-04-29
+
==== Violations Commited ====
−
|
+
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
−
| Contacted Mr. Ron McBride at 1:36 PM, Chieftain Energy Contractor, on cell phone, and was instructed to repair the earthen dike around the tank battery.  Quantabs had shown chlorides inside and outside the earthen dike.  Mr. McBride was given two options for contaminated soil: remove contaminated soil, new topsoil, seed and mulch or bioremediation to include fertilizer, lime, seed and mulch.  Mr. McBride agreed to repair the dike and has opted to perform bioremediation.
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Inspection ID
−
|
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Violation ID
−
|
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Violation Date
−
|
+
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Violation Code
 +
!scope="col" style="text-align: center"| Violation Comments
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| 0420304997
 +
| US-OH-124474
 +
| 2011-10-05
 +
|
 +
| Well operation causing pollution and contamination
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 420304997
+
| 0420304997
 +
| US-OH-124475
 
| 2011-10-05
 
| 2011-10-05
−
|
+
|  
−
| A follow up inspection revealed that there was a flow line leaking gas and blowing bubbles into a pool of fluid outside of the dike.  The kill zone caused the pool of fluid  was approximately 12' by 35'.  The fluid was tested with High Range Quantab titrators it registered 8.6 which is 5912 ppm (mg/L) chloride.  There was no oil sheen on the fluid.  There was also an abundance of fluid inside of the dike.  Met Ron McBride, and Doug Kitchen in the field.  They attempted to fix the leak, but weren't able to, so they shut the valve and will fix it when the clean up of the contaminated material takes place.  Ron and Doug were given a week to remove contaminated soil, and get dike sucked out.  If complied with by the extension date, company may take contaminated soil back to their shop for bioremediation.  If not, contaminated soil will have to be disposed of in an EPA approved landfill.
+
| Failure to keep dike or pit free of brine or other wastes
−
|
+
|-
−
| 9-1-07
+
| 1155927171
−
|
+
| US-OH-104097
 +
| 2006-08-18
 +
|
 +
| Well operation causing pollution and contamination
 +
|-
 +
| 1155927171
 +
| US-OH-104098
 +
| 2006-08-18
 +
|
 +
| Failure to legibly identify well
 +
|-
 +
| 1239281417
 +
| US-OH-106376
 +
| 2009-04-09
 +
|
 +
| Well operation causing pollution and contamination
 +
|-
 +
| 1239281417
 +
| US-OH-106377
 +
| 2009-04-09
 +
|
 +
| No SPCC dike/or failure to keep dike free of water or oil
 +
|-
 +
| 1280009483
 +
| US-OH-107772
 +
| 2009-05-13
 +
|
 +
| Equipment pressure rated below operating pressure
 +
|-
 +
| 1280009483
 +
| US-OH-107773
 +
| 2009-05-13
 +
|
 +
| No SPCC dike/or failure to keep dike free of water or oil
 +
|-
 +
| 1312898085
 +
| US-OH-108888
 +
| 2011-08-09
 +
|
 +
| Well operation causing pollution and contamination
 +
|-
 +
| 1312898085
 +
| US-OH-108889
 +
| 2011-08-09
 +
|
 +
| Unlawful venting or flaring of gas
 +
|-
 +
| 1352148423
 +
| US-OH-110186
 +
| 2012-11-09
 +
|
 +
| Equipment pressure rated below operating pressure
 +
|-
 +
| 1352148423
 +
| US-OH-110187
 +
| 2012-11-09
 +
|
 +
| Dike or pit not able to prevent escape of brine or other wastes
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| 1352148423
 +
| US-OH-110188
 +
| 2012-11-09
 +
|
 +
| Failure to keep dike or pit free of brine or other wastes
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 420304997
+
| 1649180289
−
| 2011-10-05
+
| US-OH-116261
−
|
+
| 2006-10-23
−
| A follow up inspection revealed that there was a flow line leaking gas and blowing bubbles into a pool of fluid outside of the dike.  The kill zone caused the pool of fluid  was approximately 12' by 35'.  The fluid was tested with High Range Quantab titrators it registered 8.6 which is 5912 ppm (mg/L) chloride.  There was no oil sheen on the fluid.  There was also an abundance of fluid inside of the dike.  Met Ron McBride, and Doug Kitchen in the field.  They attempted to fix the leak, but weren't able to, so they shut the valve and will fix it when the clean up of the contaminated material takes place.  Ron and Doug were given a week to remove contaminated soil, and get dike sucked out.  If complied with by the extension date, company may take contaminated soil back to their shop for bioremediation.  If not, contaminated soil will have to be disposed of in an EPA approved landfill.
+
|  
−
|
+
| Well shall be plugged
−
| NONE[C]
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| 1858686454
 +
| US-OH-118608
 +
| 2003-11-10
 +
|
 +
| Well operation causing pollution and contamination
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 60443639
+
| 1858686454
−
| 2003-12-23
+
| US-OH-118609
−
|
+
| 2003-11-10
−
| Follow-up on NOV, Non-Compliance, company has not complied with NOV.  1/12/04  to date company has not complied with NOV and corrected violations, turned over to management.
+
|  
−
|
+
| Failure to legibly identify well
−
|
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| 1858686454
 +
| US-OH-118610
 +
| 2003-11-10
 +
|
 +
| Equipment pressure rated below operating pressure
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 695121107
+
| 1858686454
−
| 2013-11-25
+
| US-OH-118611
−
|
+
| 2003-11-10
−
| Compliance notice follow up, the dike is empty and the contamination has been cleaned up. This satisfies the compliance notice.
+
|  
−
|
+
| No SPCC dike/or failure to keep dike free of water or oil
−
|
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Risk Based Data Management System - tblInspection, tblInspFail and tblinspFlDesc Tables
 +
|publisher = [[Ohio Department of Natural Resources]]
 +
| date =  2020-11-16
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources
 +
| accessdate = 2020-11-16 }}</ref>
 +
==References==
 +
<references/>
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
−
[[Category:Wells]]
+
[[Category:Ohio Wells]]

Latest revision as of 06:59, 12 January 2021

Well Details

Well ID: 34-073-21899
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: Hocking
Municipality: Green Township
Operator Name: HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: NUTTER LOWELL
License Status: Producing
License Date: 1976-06-10
Spud Date: 1976-06-01
Spud Drilling Contractor:
Final Drill Date: 1976-10-08
Well Total Depth: 2850.00 ft
Configuration: Vertical
Latitude: 39.540000
Longitude: -82.340000

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
Original Spud 1976-06-01
CO 1976-06-10 566 GRIM PAUL A GeoDate 6/10/76
Completed 1976-10-08
Reached Total Depth 1976-10-08
Change of Owner 2001-10-29 Operator changed from 566, GRIM PAUL A to 5755, CHIEFTAIN ENERGY CORP.
Record Last Modified 2013-10-03

For data sources see[2]

Stimulations Data

Stimulation Date Chemical Agent Chemical Agent Concentration (%) Fracking Fluid Volume Mass of Proppant Used (lb) Fracking Company Comments
H2O 0 5500 Bbl 20000

For data sources see[3]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Oil Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1984 GRIM PAUL A 2404.00 396.00 365
1985 GRIM PAUL A 1796.00 529.00 365
1986 GRIM PAUL A 755.00 270.00 365
1987 GRIM PAUL A 953.00 198.00 365
1988 GRIM PAUL A 103.00 80.00 365
1989 GRIM PAUL A 66.00 40.00 365
1990 GRIM PAUL A 59.00 256.00 365
1991 GRIM PAUL A 509.00 225.00 365
1992 GRIM PAUL A 942.00 210.00 365
1993 GRIM PAUL A 520.00 73.00 365
1994 GRIM PAUL A 1015.00 102.00 365
1995 GRIM PAUL A 302.00 77.00 365
1996 GRIM PAUL A 256.00 120.00 365
1997 GRIM PAUL A 148.00 22.00 365
1998 GRIM PAUL A 0.00 47.00 365
1999 GRIM PAUL A 0.00 0.00 365
2000 GRIM PAUL A 0.00 124.00 365
2001 GRIM PAUL A 0.00 14.00 365
2002 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL 0.00 0.00 0
2003 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL 0.00 9.00 65
2004 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL 0.00 7.00 365
2005 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL 0.00 0.00 365
2006 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL 0.00 12.00 365
2007 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL 0.00 38.00 365
2008 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL 0.00 38.00 365
2009 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL 0.00 38.00 365
2010 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL 0.00 26.00 0
2011 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL 0.00 54.00 365
2012 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL 0.00 54.00 366
2013 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL 0.00 84.00 365
2014 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL 0.00 54.00 365
2015 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL 0.00 27.00 365
2016 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL 0.00 16.00 365
2017 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL 0.00 16.00 365

For data sources see[4] [5]

Waste Data

Period Operator Name Waste Type Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1984 GRIM PAUL A Brine 0 365
1985 GRIM PAUL A Brine 365 365
1986 GRIM PAUL A Brine 0 365
1987 GRIM PAUL A Brine 0 365
1988 GRIM PAUL A Brine 0 365
1989 GRIM PAUL A Brine 0 365
1990 GRIM PAUL A Brine 0 365
1991 GRIM PAUL A Brine 0 365
1992 GRIM PAUL A Brine 28 365
1993 GRIM PAUL A Brine 44 365
1994 GRIM PAUL A Brine 80 365
1995 GRIM PAUL A Brine 140 365
1996 GRIM PAUL A Brine 480 365
1997 GRIM PAUL A Brine 56 365
1998 GRIM PAUL A Brine 40 365
1999 GRIM PAUL A Brine 0 365
2000 GRIM PAUL A Brine 140 365
2001 GRIM PAUL A Brine 70 365
2002 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL Brine 0 0
2003 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL Brine 110 65
2004 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL Brine 42 365
2005 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL Brine 0 365
2006 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL Brine 62 365
2007 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL Brine 30 365
2008 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL Brine 30 365
2009 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL Brine 30 365
2010 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL Brine 24 0
2011 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL Brine 38 365
2012 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL Brine 300 366
2013 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL Brine 238 365
2014 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL Brine 322 365
2015 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL Brine 26 365
2016 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL Brine 25 365
2017 HOCKING HILLS ENERGY AND WELL Brine 25 365

For data sources see[6] [7]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
-1280009483 2009-4-27 0:00: PW No Violations
-1302859697 2010-12-3 0:00: PW No Violations 0.50
-1394834397 2018-7-31 0:00: PW No Violations 0.10
-162585293 2018-4-13 0:00: PW No Violations 0.20
-1649180289 2006-10-18 0:00 PW No Violations
-175437051 2012-11-15 0:00 PW No Violations 1.00
-2078785054 2009-5-6 0:00:0 PW No Violations
-354994637 2006-12-22 0:00 PW No Violations
-383899726 2004-3-17 0:00: PW No Violations
-510898090 2012-11-5 0:00: PW No Violations 4.00
0060443639 2003-12-23 Production Wells No Violations Follow-up on NOV, Non-Compliance, company has not complied with NOV. 1/12/04 to date company has not complied with NOV and corrected violations, turned over to management.
0162585293 2018-04-13 Production Wells No Violations My inspection revealed the well consists of a pumping unit, vertical separator, 2-100 barrel tanks, 1-20 barrel tank and gas sales meter. This well shares a common tank battery with 3407322037. Legible identification was posted.
0175437051 2012-11-15 Production Wells No Violations The dike was full of water. Mr. Bill Wray stated that it had been sucked out with the water truck, but it continues to fill up. He also said that efforts will be made to remedy the problem, but it could be a combination of rain and the fact that the tank battery is in a low lying area. Neither of the tanks have been losing fluid. Clean-up has been performed around the well head. The leaky valve has also been fixed.
0216973396 2009-04-29 Administrative Inspection No Violations Contacted Mr. Ron McBride at 1:36 PM, Chieftain Energy Contractor, on cell phone, and was instructed to repair the earthen dike around the tank battery. Quantabs had shown chlorides inside and outside the earthen dike. Mr. McBride was given two options for contaminated soil: remove contaminated soil, new topsoil, seed and mulch or bioremediation to include fertilizer, lime, seed and mulch. Mr. McBride agreed to repair the dike and has opted to perform bioremediation.
0354994637 2006-12-22 Production Wells No Violations A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has been resolved. The well was observed pumping with no signs of mechanical problems.
0383899726 2004-03-17 Production Wells No Violations Follow-up, In-Compliance.
0420304997 2011-10-05 Production Wells Violations Noted A follow up inspection revealed that there was a flow line leaking gas and blowing bubbles into a pool of fluid outside of the dike. The kill zone caused the pool of fluid was approximately 12 by 35. The fluid was tested with High Range Quantab titrators it registered 8.6 which is 5912 ppm (mg/L) chloride. There was no oil sheen on the fluid. There was also an abundance of fluid inside of the dike. Met Ron McBride, and Doug Kitchen in the field. They attempted to fix the leak, but werent able to, so they shut the valve and will fix it when the clean up of the contaminated material takes place. Ron and Doug were given a week to remove contaminated soil, and get dike sucked out. If complied with by the extension date, company may take contaminated soil back to their shop for bioremediation. If not, contaminated soil will have to be disposed of in an EPA approved landfill.
0510898090 2012-11-05 Production Wells No Violations FOLLOW UP TO NOV # 1352148423 Received phone call from Mike Sherron (OEPA) on Sunday 11/4/12 at 5:45 pm stating that the dike for the tank battery had over flown, there was a valve bubbling gas inside the dike, there was a slight oil sheen and that he had deployed an absorbent boom across the point of escape. When I arrived on site I observed the dike full of fluid, and the boom deployed. There was a very slight oil sheen, and small amounts of residual oil on top of the water. The boom had only thin stripes of contamination on it. The point of escape for the water was a low place in the dike that hadnt been completely closed after work had been done on the tank battery. The valve was that was reported as bubbling was indeed bubbling. I tested the water for chlorides in three places: inside the dike, just outside the dike, and in a pool of water 20 yards away. The water inside the dike registered a 4.2 on the High Range Quantab which means there were 787 parts per million chlorides in it. Both quantabs on the outside of the dike did not register enough chlorides to quantify. I spoke with Mr. Bill Wray, explained to him the situation, and gave him instructions to empty the dike of any fluid. He stated that it would be done this evening. As far as fixing the bubbling valve and the low spot on the dike, that would be taken care of later this week. I also brought to his attention remedial clean-up needed around the well head. He stated that that will also be taken care of this week. Photos were taken at the time of inspection. Spoke with property owner Lowell Nutter during inspection.
0695121107 2013-11-25 Production Wells No Violations Compliance notice follow up, the dike is empty and the contamination has been cleaned up. This satisfies the compliance notice.
1155927171 2006-08-09 Production Wells Violations Noted An inspection was conducted at the facility owned by Chieftain Energy Corp on 8/9/2006. During the inspection, it was noted that the well utilized a common tank battery and no ID was observed at the well. Also noted was that the oily soil needs to be removed from the lease.
1239281417 2009-03-18 Production Wells Violations Noted An inspection revealed contamination and pollution near the well and inside the earthen dike. The dike has reached maximum capacity of fluid and was also found to contain oil. The source of the leak is from a separator inside the dike and two fittings on the bottom of (2) separate 100 bbl tanks showed signs of leakage (stains). The tank battery is located in a low lying area at the edge of a pasture field, and road located approximately 300 feet away from a nearby creek. At the time of the inspection, the area surrounding the well and tank battery location remain wet, due to rainfall events, and runoff from nearby road. The earthen dike may be leaking and will be evaluated when the surrounding area begins to dry. Quantabs (High Range) placed at locations showed no signs of accelerated chloride. No oil sheen was observed outside the dike. Near the well location, old parrafin was observed on the ground surface and will need to be removed. Note: The company was informed of the inspection results, in the field, and also by telephone to include that the dike may be leaking and will be evaluated.
1280009483 2009-04-27 Production Wells Violations Noted Chieftain Energy Contractor, Mr. Ron McBride called by telephone today and stated that the dike had been pumped. A follow-up inspection revealed that the dike has been pumped, but contamination and pollution still remains in the dike. The separator still needs to be repaired, due to a bad dump valve. Due to a lack of rainfall events, the earthen dike was again evaluated to ensure that it was not leaking. During the inspection, it was noted that the dike would need to be repaired. High Range Quantabs (Titrators for Chloride) were utilized at three locations. Two locations inside the dike measure 2.8 and 3.8 units, which equals 538 and 899 ppm (mg/l) Cl- respectively. A location behind the dike contained a bare area with deer tracks measuring approximately 20 x 100. A titrator placed near the beginning edge of this bare area showed a value of 4.2 units, 1079 ppm (mg/l) Cl- . Note: A nearby creek is approximately 300 from this location. The trench along the edge of the field allows water to drain offsite and into the creek. A titrator placed near. Chieftain Energy will be contacted regarding this inspection.
1302859697 2010-12-03 Production Wells No Violations An inspection revealed small gas leak around polish rod liner. The liner leans to one side, as pumping unit does not appear to be level. Valves were observed open and well pumps into a shared tank battery. At time of the inspection, no statements of production have been submitted to the Division since 2006. Chieftain Energy Corp. is currently addressing this deficiency for the years 2007-2009 on all wells.
1302906523 2009-05-11 Production Wells No Violations A follow-up inspection revealed that dike drain was releasing fluid from the dike. Oil was observed inside the dike. Outside the dike a 5 x 3 section of oil was observed. Quantabs showed acceptable amount of Cl- in fluid. Contacted Chieftain Energy and instructed to install dike and apply absorbent pads to areas that contain contamination and pollution. The equipment that had previously been observed has now been removed from the location. The dike does not show signs of being repaired only installed drain.
1312898085 2011-08-02 Production Wells Violations Noted An inspection of the tank battery and separator revealed two violations. There was water in the tank battery that when tested with high range Quantab titrators, completely maxed them out. The chloride content is greater than 6765 ppm (mg/L). Water needs to be removed, and the soil underneath also needs to be removed and hauled away. Gas was being vented from a pop-off valve on top of the separator. This needs to be corrected, or a flare needs to be constructed as per OAC 1501:9-9-05(B). Property owner receives house gas.
1318531411 2011-10-12 Production Wells No Violations Well not in compliance. Flow-line leak had been fixed. No contamination removed. Tank battery not sucked out. Met with Doug Kitchen and Ron McBride and extended the deadline by one week. They were amidst a business move. If complied with by the extension date, company may take contaminated soil back to their shop for bioremediation. If not, contaminated soil will have to be disposed of in an EPA approved landfill.
1352148423 2012-11-05 Production Wells Violations Noted Received phone call from Mike Sherron (OEPA) on Sunday 11/4/12 at 5:45 pm stating that the dike for the tank battery had over flown, there was a valve bubbling gas inside the dike, there was a slight oil sheen and that he had deployed an absorbent boom across the point of escape. When I arrived on site I observed the dike full of fluid, and the boom deployed. There was a very slight oil sheen, and small amounts of residual oil on top of the water. The boom had only thin stripes of contamination on it. The point of escape for the water was a low place in the dike that hadnt been completely closed after work had been done on the tank battery. The valve was that was reported as bubbling was indeed bubbling. I tested the water for chlorides in three places: inside the dike, just outside the dike, and in a pool of water 20 yards away. The water inside the dike registered a 4.2 on the High Range Quantab which means there were 787 parts per million chlorides in it. Both quantabs on the outside of the dike did not register enough chlorides to quantify. I spoke with Mr. Bill Wray, explained to him the situation, and gave him instructions to empty the dike of any fluid. He stated that it would be done this evening. As far as fixing the bubbling valve and the low spot on the dike, that would be taken care of later this week. I also brought to his attention remedial clean-up needed around the well head. He stated that that will also be taken care of this week. Photos were taken at the time of inspection. Spoke with property owner Lowell Nutter during inspection.
1394834397 2018-07-31 Production Wells No Violations My inspection revealed the well consists of a pumping unit, 2-100 barrel tanks,1-20 barrel tank and a vertical separator. Legible identification was posted.
1605632957 2012-08-09 Production Wells No Violations Witnessed efforts to re-plumb tank battery and replace flow lines. Accompanied by inspector Morgan Button.
1619487256 2009-04-23 Production Wells No Violations A follow-up inspection conducted with Oil & Gas Supervisor, Mr. Robert Stonerock revealed non-compliance. It was noted that the earthen dike still contains fluid and oil and the stuffing box rubbers may need to be repaired.
1649180289 2006-10-18 Production Wells Violations Noted A complaint was received alleging that the Parley and Lowell Nutter wells are idle. According to the owner of Chieftain Energy, Mr. Doug Kitchen, and the landowner, Mr. Lowell Nutter all seven wells are tied into each other to produce house gas. Mr. Nutter states that little gas is obtained from these wells. Mr. Kitchen admitted that a few wells need some work. Mr. Kitchen will be given credit for 1 well since some house gas is generated. The other 6 wells must be plugged or produced. Mr. Kitchen was given a verbal NOV on 10/18/2006.
1809874276 2011-10-18 Production Wells No Violations Witnessed clean-up efforts performed by Ron McBride, and Doug Kitchen. Property owner Lowell Nutter was there as well. Contaminated soil had been removed and stockpiled on location. Mr. Kitchen and Mr. Nutter agreed on composting contaminated soil where it was stockpiled. Mr. Nutter offered this as a solution. Contaminated soil will be remediated by mixing horse or cow manure and lime with it and will be re-mixed approximately 6 months from now. The soil will then be placed back in the area in which it came.
1858686454 2003-11-06 Production Wells Violations Noted An inspection of the well revealed No ID at the well, oily soil in dike around tank battery, production tanks leaking around bottoms, fittings and seams. Dike does not meet SPCC requirements, not large enough. 1/12/04 to date company has not complied with NOV and corrected violations, turned over to management.
1907206378 2009-05-13 Production Wells No Violations A follow-up inspection revealed that the oil has been cleaned up outside the dike. A plug has been placed on location for drain pipe from the earthen dike.
2047327363 2009-04-29 Production Wells No Violations Met with the landowner and Chieftain Energy Contractor, Mr. Ron McBride regarding the violations and proposed plans to achieve compliance.
2078785054 2009-05-06 Production Wells No Violations A follow-up inspection revealed non-compliance. It was noted however, that equipment has been placed on-site to begin working towards achieving compliance.
2094768041 2012-12-04 Production Wells No Violations Company was servicing well at the time of inspection. Rods had been pulled, and tubing was being pulled. Accompanied by Andrew Adgate and Steve Riley.
216973396 2009-4-29 0:00: AM No Violations
420304997 2011-10-5 0:00: PW No Violations 3.00
60443639 2003-12-23 0:00 PW No Violations
695121107 2013-11-25 0:00 PW No Violations 1.00

Violations Commited

Inspection ID Violation ID Violation Date Violation Code Violation Comments
0420304997 US-OH-124474 2011-10-05 Well operation causing pollution and contamination
0420304997 US-OH-124475 2011-10-05 Failure to keep dike or pit free of brine or other wastes
1155927171 US-OH-104097 2006-08-18 Well operation causing pollution and contamination
1155927171 US-OH-104098 2006-08-18 Failure to legibly identify well
1239281417 US-OH-106376 2009-04-09 Well operation causing pollution and contamination
1239281417 US-OH-106377 2009-04-09 No SPCC dike/or failure to keep dike free of water or oil
1280009483 US-OH-107772 2009-05-13 Equipment pressure rated below operating pressure
1280009483 US-OH-107773 2009-05-13 No SPCC dike/or failure to keep dike free of water or oil
1312898085 US-OH-108888 2011-08-09 Well operation causing pollution and contamination
1312898085 US-OH-108889 2011-08-09 Unlawful venting or flaring of gas
1352148423 US-OH-110186 2012-11-09 Equipment pressure rated below operating pressure
1352148423 US-OH-110187 2012-11-09 Dike or pit not able to prevent escape of brine or other wastes
1352148423 US-OH-110188 2012-11-09 Failure to keep dike or pit free of brine or other wastes
1649180289 US-OH-116261 2006-10-23 Well shall be plugged
1858686454 US-OH-118608 2003-11-10 Well operation causing pollution and contamination
1858686454 US-OH-118609 2003-11-10 Failure to legibly identify well
1858686454 US-OH-118610 2003-11-10 Equipment pressure rated below operating pressure
1858686454 US-OH-118611 2003-11-10 No SPCC dike/or failure to keep dike free of water or oil

For data sources see[8]

References

  1. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Well, tblLocational, tblPlugWell, tblInspection, tblCivilTownships and tblPad Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  2. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Well and WellHistry Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  3. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - tblStimulation Table". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  4. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Oil and Gas Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  5. ↑ "Combined Production - Oil and Gas Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  6. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Brine Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  7. ↑ "Combined Production - Brine Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  8. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - tblInspection, tblInspFail and tblinspFlDesc Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
Retrieved from "https://wellwiki-prod.cloud.arc.gwu.edu/index.php?title=34-073-21899&oldid=14166947"