X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

Difference between revisions of "34-155-21438"

m
 
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
| Well ID: 34-155-21438
 
| Well ID: 34-155-21438
 +
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 41.23930633, -80.63822504 | width=100% | height=100% }}
 
|-
 
|-
−
| County:
+
| County: [[Trumbull County, Ohio|Trumbull]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Municipality:
+
| Municipality:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Operator Name:
+
| Operator Name: [[KLEESE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCS]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Well Pad ID:
+
| Well Pad ID:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Farm/Lease Name:
+
| Farm/Lease Name:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| First Permit Date:
+
| First Permit Date:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Last Permit Date:
+
| Last Permit Date:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Spud Date:
+
| Spud Date: 1980-03-07
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Unconventional:
+
| Unconventional: No
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Horizontal:
+
| Configuration: Vertical
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Producing:
+
| Well Status: Active Injection
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Violations:
+
| Violations: 0
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Latitude:
+
| Latitude: 41.23930633
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Longitude:
+
| Longitude: -80.63822504
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 42: Line 43:
 
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
 
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
 
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
−
|}
 
−
== Waste Data ==
 
−
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
−
!scope="col" | PERIOD
 
−
!scope="col" | TYPE
 
−
!scope="col" | QUANTITY
 
−
!scope="col" | UNITS
 
−
!scope="col" | DISPOSAL METHOD
 
−
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID
 
−
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY NAME
 
−
!scope="col" | FACILITY CITY
 
−
!scope="col" | FACILITY STATE
 
−
|}
 
−
== Inspection Data ==
 
−
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
−
!scope="col" | INSPECTION ID
 
−
!scope="col" | DATE
 
−
!scope="col" | DESCRIPTION
 
−
!scope="col" | COMMENT
 
−
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 
−
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE
 
−
!scope="col" | VIOLATION_COMMENT
 
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -1191951268
+
| 1984-0
−
| 2013-05-14
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 4558.0
−
|
+
|
−
| My inspection of the well and surface facility found a truck without an Underground Injection Control number. The truck was owned and operated by Liquid Luggers. Dave Jenkins was notified. The truck driver was instructed to wait on location, until the truck was properly labeled.
+
|
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 63.0
−
|
+
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1985-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 6402.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 113.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1986-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 5453.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 45.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1987-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 4734.0
 +
|  
 +
|  
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 74.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1988-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 3291.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 33.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1989-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 2356.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 33.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1990-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 2885.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 50.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1992-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 2.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1993-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 10.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2002-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 3076.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 31.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2003-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 2902.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2004-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 2741.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -145081195
+
| 2005-0
−
| 2012-10-16
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 2715.0
−
|
+
|  
−
| My inspection of the injection facility and well found no violations.  The pump was operating, while the pressures were gauged.
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 40.0
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -1463080583
+
| 2006-0
−
| 2012-06-19
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 1772.0
−
|
+
|  
−
| My inspection of the well and facility found no violations.
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 61.0
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -1472625338
+
| 2007-0
−
| 2013-04-04
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 2021.0
−
|
+
|  
−
| My inspection of the injection facility and well found no violations.  The pump was operating at the time pressures were gauged.
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 60.0
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -158305718
+
| 2008-0
−
| 2014-06-13
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 3576.0
−
|
+
|  
−
| The well was found operating over the maximum allowable injection pressure.  Matt Kleese was notified in person.  The pump rate was slowed, lowering the injection pressure.
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
| 9-3-07(D)
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -1696987330
+
| 2010-0
−
| 2013-01-09
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 2429.0
−
|
+
|  
−
| My inspection of the injection facility and well found no violations.
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 127.0
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -188703593
+
| 2011-0
−
| 2011-08-18
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 1576.0
−
|
+
|  
−
| The owner has applied to convert the well to a saltwater injection well.  The well site was inspected as part of a field review.  There are no water wells or bodies of water within close proximity to the proposed location of surface facilities.  The inspe
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 49.0
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS
 +
| publisher = [http://oilandgas.ohiodnr.gov/]
 +
| date = 2015-06-19
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Production
 +
| accessdate = 2015-06-20 }}</ref>
 +
== Inspection Data ==
 +
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 +
!scope="col" | INSPECTION ID
 +
!scope="col" | DATE
 +
!scope="col" | DESCRIPTION
 +
!scope="col" | COMMENT
 +
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 +
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE
 +
!scope="col" | VIOLATION COMMENT
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -1894502968
+
| -1191951268
−
| 2012-07-03
+
| 2013-05-14
−
|
+
|  
−
| My inspection of the well site found no violations at the time.
+
| My inspection of the well and surface facility found a truck without an Underground Injection Control number.  The truck was owned and operated by Liquid Luggers.  Dave Jenkins was notified.  The truck driver was instructed to wait on location, until the truck was properly labeled.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -2132087981
+
| -1204602722
−
| 2012-07-20
+
| 2015-03-17
−
|
+
|  
−
| My inspection of the well site and injection facility found no violations.
+
| The injection well and surface facility were inspected.  There were no violations found at the time.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -669971554
+
| 1267940779
−
| 2012-12-05
+
| 2014-11-24
−
|
+
|  
−
| My inspection of the injection facility found no violations.  I took a water sample from a brine hauler.  The sample was sent to the Cambridge Lab for analysis.
+
| The injection well and surface facility were inspected.  There were no violations found at the time.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1300289555
 
| 1300289555
 
| 2013-05-14
 
| 2013-05-14
−
|
+
|  
−
| I completed a salt water injection well inspection with ODNR Inspector Steve Ochs.  My inspection found the tubing had 1130 psi and the 4.5" had 0 psi.  The injection facility was in good operating condition with no water or oil surrounding the diked tanks.
+
| I completed a salt water injection well inspection with ODNR Inspector Steve Ochs.  My inspection found the tubing had 1130 psi and the 4.5 had 0 psi.  The injection facility was in good operating condition with no water or oil surrounding the diked tanks.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1318336643
 
| 1318336643
 
| 2011-10-11
 
| 2011-10-11
−
|
+
|  
 
| Parmaco tension packer installation was witnessed.
 
| Parmaco tension packer installation was witnessed.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1318429191
 
| 1318429191
 
| 2011-10-12
 
| 2011-10-12
−
|
+
|  
 
| Fresh water, with corrosion inhibitor, was pumped into the tubing/casing annulus.  A Parmaco tension packer was set.  The well failed to pass the Mechanical Integrity Test.
 
| Fresh water, with corrosion inhibitor, was pumped into the tubing/casing annulus.  A Parmaco tension packer was set.  The well failed to pass the Mechanical Integrity Test.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1320080398
 
| 1320080398
 
| 2011-10-31
 
| 2011-10-31
−
|
+
|  
 
| Contractor attempted to set the packer.
 
| Contractor attempted to set the packer.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1404816190
 
| 1404816190
 
| 2011-10-31
 
| 2011-10-31
−
|
+
|  
 
| A mechanical integrity test was performed on this well and 1180 PSI was placed on the tubing/casing annulus.  There was a decline in pressure of approximately 5 PSI observed during the 15 minute test period.
 
| A mechanical integrity test was performed on this well and 1180 PSI was placed on the tubing/casing annulus.  There was a decline in pressure of approximately 5 PSI observed during the 15 minute test period.
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1420569888
 +
| 2014-11-20
 +
|
 +
| PERFORMED FIELD AUDIT ON BRINE TRUCKS. WITNESSED 3 KDA TRUCKS (UIC # 25-492), 2 SALLACK TRUCKS (UIC #457), AND 1 MYERS WELL SERVICE TRUCK (UIC #427) ALL LABELED PROPERLY AND APPROVED TO DISPOSE AT THIS SITE. NO TRUCK VIOLATIONS FOUND.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1429279561
 +
| 2015-04-11
 +
|
 +
| I was on site to conduct a status check for the ongoing clean-up at the Kleese UIC site.  Spoke with John McCollums and Stace Bieber of Hull and  Associates about the ongoing efforts to clean up the remaining oil, and removal of the storage tank farm.  The storage tanks at the time of the inspection were 40% empty and the two most eastern ponds that had been impacted had been cleaned of oil.  Observed that sediment and erosion controls had been installed along wetland and ponds on the east side of Sodom Hutchings Road and were being maintained as clean-up efforts continue.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1429646055
 +
| 2015-02-13
 +
|
 +
| The injection well and surface facility were inspected.  The annulus was frozen.  There were no violations found at the time.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1430403031
 +
| 2015-04-10
 +
|
 +
| Complaint# 4989, Marty Cisine.  I was on site to witness the pressure test on the flow line. The company pressured the flow line to 1380 psi and then shut-in the flow line. I monitored the pressure for 15 minutes. There was no loss of pressure. The injection of fluid was then allowed to proceed.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -145081195
 +
| 2012-10-16
 +
|
 +
| My inspection of the injection facility and well found no violations.  The pump was operating, while the pressures were gauged.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -1463080583
 +
| 2012-06-19
 +
|
 +
| My inspection of the well and facility found no violations.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -1472625338
 +
| 2013-04-04
 +
|
 +
| My inspection of the injection facility and well found no violations.  The pump was operating at the time pressures were gauged.
 +
|  
 +
|  
 +
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1496083948
 
| 1496083948
 
| 2012-09-04
 
| 2012-09-04
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -158305718
 +
| 2014-06-13
 +
|
 +
| The well was found operating over the maximum allowable injection pressure.  Matt Kleese was notified in person.  The pump rate was slowed, lowering the injection pressure.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1669358496
 +
| 2015-04-22
 +
|
 +
| I was on location for a follow-up inspection in reference to compliance notice no. 1429805013.  During my inspection, I found Kleese Development Associates (KDA) removing slag  and soil from where the tank pad had been.  The slag and soil was placed on separate liners for proper disposal.  Hull & Associates were on location to test the slag and soil.  I observed approximately 3 gallons of water and oil in the trench along the UIC facility.  KDA was actively removing the water and oil from the trench using a water truck.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -1696987330
 +
| 2013-01-09
 +
|
 +
| My inspection of the injection facility and well found no violations.
 +
|  
 +
|  
 +
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 169837762
 
| 169837762
 
| 2012-02-01
 
| 2012-02-01
−
|
+
|  
 
| A trench was dug to tie the oil tank containment dike into the drainage system.
 
| A trench was dug to tie the oil tank containment dike into the drainage system.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 171751610
 
| 171751610
 
| 2011-10-03
 
| 2011-10-03
−
|
+
|  
 
| An injection test was performed on this well.  Approximately 400 barrels of fluid were pumped in 1 hour and 3 minutes.  The average rate was 6.35 barrels per minute.  The maximum pressure was 875 PSI.  The pressure at the conclusion of the test was 600 PSI.  The pressure was at 525 PSI, 5 minutes after shutdown.
 
| An injection test was performed on this well.  Approximately 400 barrels of fluid were pumped in 1 hour and 3 minutes.  The average rate was 6.35 barrels per minute.  The maximum pressure was 875 PSI.  The pressure at the conclusion of the test was 600 PSI.  The pressure was at 525 PSI, 5 minutes after shutdown.
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -188703593
 +
| 2011-08-18
 +
|
 +
| The owner has applied to convert the well to a saltwater injection well.  The well site was inspected as part of a field review.  There are no water wells or bodies of water within close proximity to the proposed location of surface facilities.  The inspe
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -1894502968
 +
| 2012-07-03
 +
|
 +
| My inspection of the well site found no violations at the time.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2050737829
 +
| 2014-07-25
 +
|
 +
| An inspection of the well and injection facility found no violations.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2055458712
 +
| 2015-04-12
 +
|
 +
| Complaint# 4989, Marty Cisine. I was on site to witness the clean-up from a brine and oil spill at a injection well storage facility. There were brine trucks removing fluid from trenches on east side of storage facility. There were also brine trucks removing fluid from sump holes near the west side of Sodom Hutchings road. The brine trucks would remove fluid in trenches and sump holes as it collected in them. They would transport the fluid collected to 500 bbl frac tanks on north side of storage facility. The company was injecting fluid into five injection wells from the storage facility the entire time I was on site. I spoke with the workers overseeing the injection of fluid, they told me they had to adjust the volume of fluid being injected due to the pressure rising in the injection wells due to the light fluid.  When I left the site there was 3000 bbl's of fluid in the tanks in the storage facility, 3000 bbl's of fluid in six 500 bbl frac tanks on north side of the storage facility and 1000 bbl's of heavy brine being stored in two 500 bbl frac tanks on south side of the pump house. The workers told me they were able to inject 4000 bbl's of fluid into the injection wells in a 24 hour period at this time depending on the current injection rate and pressures.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -2132087981
 +
| 2012-07-20
 +
|
 +
| My inspection of the well site and injection facility found no violations.
 +
|  
 +
|  
 +
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 329206871
 
| 329206871
 
| 2012-03-12
 
| 2012-03-12
−
|
+
|  
 
| My inspection of this site found the dike wall was being constructed.  There were no violations noted at the time of inspection.
 
| My inspection of this site found the dike wall was being constructed.  There were no violations noted at the time of inspection.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 517272107
 
| 517272107
 
| 2013-08-20
 
| 2013-08-20
−
|
+
|  
 
| There were no violations at the time of inspection.
 
| There were no violations at the time of inspection.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 556276720
 
| 556276720
 
| 2014-03-17
 
| 2014-03-17
−
|
+
|  
 
| My inspection of the well found no violations at the time.
 
| My inspection of the well found no violations at the time.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 562822320
 
| 562822320
 
| 2012-08-14
 
| 2012-08-14
−
|
+
|  
 
| My inspection of the well site and injection facility found no violations.
 
| My inspection of the well site and injection facility found no violations.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 59604026
 
| 59604026
 
| 2013-10-10
 
| 2013-10-10
−
|
+
|  
 
| No violations were found at the time of inspection.
 
| No violations were found at the time of inspection.
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -669971554
 +
| 2012-12-05
 +
|
 +
| My inspection of the injection facility found no violations.  I took a water sample from a brine hauler.  The sample was sent to the Cambridge Lab for analysis.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 671072835
 +
| 2014-07-22
 +
|
 +
| An inspection of the well and injection facility found no violations.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -701541984
 +
| 2014-08-28
 +
|
 +
| There were no violations found at the time of inspection.
 +
|  
 +
|  
 +
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 707560555
 
| 707560555
 
| 2011-10-19
 
| 2011-10-19
−
|
+
|  
 
| A Mechanical Integrity Test was performed.  The test failed.
 
| A Mechanical Integrity Test was performed.  The test failed.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 748827000
 
| 748827000
 
| 2012-01-10
 
| 2012-01-10
−
|
+
|  
 
| The pad was being poured for the tank battery.  All conditions were acceptable.
 
| The pad was being poured for the tank battery.  All conditions were acceptable.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 803709669
 
| 803709669
 
| 2012-06-06
 
| 2012-06-06
−
|
+
|  
 
| My inspection of this well site found no violations at the time.
 
| My inspection of this well site found no violations at the time.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 959693422
 
| 959693422
 
| 2011-10-26
 
| 2011-10-26
−
|
+
|  
 
| A mechanical integrity test was performed on this well and 1235 PSI was put on the tubing/casing annulus.  There was a decline in pressure of approximately 5 PSI observed during the 15 minute test period.
 
| A mechanical integrity test was performed on this well and 1235 PSI was put on the tubing/casing annulus.  There was a decline in pressure of approximately 5 PSI observed during the 15 minute test period.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS
 +
| publisher = [http://oilandgas.ohiodnr.gov/]
 +
| date = 2015-06-19
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Inspection
 +
| accessdate = 2015-06-20 }}</ref>
 +
== References ==
 +
{{reflist}}
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
[[Category:Wells]]
 
[[Category:Wells]]

Revision as of 11:18, 14 July 2015

Well Details

Well ID: 34-155-21438
Loading map...
County: Trumbull
Municipality:
Operator Name: KLEESE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCS
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name:
First Permit Date:
Last Permit Date:
Spud Date: 1980-03-07
Unconventional: No
Configuration: Vertical
Well Status: Active Injection
Violations: 0
Latitude: 41.23930633
Longitude: -80.63822504

Production Data

PERIOD GAS QUANTITY GAS PRODUCTION DAYS CONDENSATE QUANTITY CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS OIL QUANTITY OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
1984-0 4558.0 63.0
1985-0 6402.0 113.0
1986-0 5453.0 45.0
1987-0 4734.0 74.0
1988-0 3291.0 33.0
1989-0 2356.0 33.0
1990-0 2885.0 50.0
1992-0 2.0 0.0
1993-0 0.0 10.0
2002-0 3076.0 31.0
2003-0 2902.0 0.0
2004-0 2741.0 0.0
2005-0 2715.0 40.0
2006-0 1772.0 61.0
2007-0 2021.0 60.0
2008-0 3576.0 0.0
2010-0 2429.0 127.0
2011-0 1576.0 49.0

For data sources see[1]

Inspection Data

INSPECTION ID DATE DESCRIPTION COMMENT VIOLATION ID VIOLATION CODE VIOLATION COMMENT
-1191951268 2013-05-14 My inspection of the well and surface facility found a truck without an Underground Injection Control number. The truck was owned and operated by Liquid Luggers. Dave Jenkins was notified. The truck driver was instructed to wait on location, until the truck was properly labeled.
-1204602722 2015-03-17 The injection well and surface facility were inspected. There were no violations found at the time.
1267940779 2014-11-24 The injection well and surface facility were inspected. There were no violations found at the time.
1300289555 2013-05-14 I completed a salt water injection well inspection with ODNR Inspector Steve Ochs. My inspection found the tubing had 1130 psi and the 4.5 had 0 psi. The injection facility was in good operating condition with no water or oil surrounding the diked tanks.
1318336643 2011-10-11 Parmaco tension packer installation was witnessed.
1318429191 2011-10-12 Fresh water, with corrosion inhibitor, was pumped into the tubing/casing annulus. A Parmaco tension packer was set. The well failed to pass the Mechanical Integrity Test.
1320080398 2011-10-31 Contractor attempted to set the packer.
1404816190 2011-10-31 A mechanical integrity test was performed on this well and 1180 PSI was placed on the tubing/casing annulus. There was a decline in pressure of approximately 5 PSI observed during the 15 minute test period.
1420569888 2014-11-20 PERFORMED FIELD AUDIT ON BRINE TRUCKS. WITNESSED 3 KDA TRUCKS (UIC # 25-492), 2 SALLACK TRUCKS (UIC #457), AND 1 MYERS WELL SERVICE TRUCK (UIC #427) ALL LABELED PROPERLY AND APPROVED TO DISPOSE AT THIS SITE. NO TRUCK VIOLATIONS FOUND.
1429279561 2015-04-11 I was on site to conduct a status check for the ongoing clean-up at the Kleese UIC site. Spoke with John McCollums and Stace Bieber of Hull and Associates about the ongoing efforts to clean up the remaining oil, and removal of the storage tank farm. The storage tanks at the time of the inspection were 40% empty and the two most eastern ponds that had been impacted had been cleaned of oil. Observed that sediment and erosion controls had been installed along wetland and ponds on the east side of Sodom Hutchings Road and were being maintained as clean-up efforts continue.
1429646055 2015-02-13 The injection well and surface facility were inspected. The annulus was frozen. There were no violations found at the time.
1430403031 2015-04-10 Complaint# 4989, Marty Cisine. I was on site to witness the pressure test on the flow line. The company pressured the flow line to 1380 psi and then shut-in the flow line. I monitored the pressure for 15 minutes. There was no loss of pressure. The injection of fluid was then allowed to proceed.
-145081195 2012-10-16 My inspection of the injection facility and well found no violations. The pump was operating, while the pressures were gauged.
-1463080583 2012-06-19 My inspection of the well and facility found no violations.
-1472625338 2013-04-04 My inspection of the injection facility and well found no violations. The pump was operating at the time pressures were gauged.
1496083948 2012-09-04
-158305718 2014-06-13 The well was found operating over the maximum allowable injection pressure. Matt Kleese was notified in person. The pump rate was slowed, lowering the injection pressure.
1669358496 2015-04-22 I was on location for a follow-up inspection in reference to compliance notice no. 1429805013. During my inspection, I found Kleese Development Associates (KDA) removing slag and soil from where the tank pad had been. The slag and soil was placed on separate liners for proper disposal. Hull & Associates were on location to test the slag and soil. I observed approximately 3 gallons of water and oil in the trench along the UIC facility. KDA was actively removing the water and oil from the trench using a water truck.
-1696987330 2013-01-09 My inspection of the injection facility and well found no violations.
169837762 2012-02-01 A trench was dug to tie the oil tank containment dike into the drainage system.
171751610 2011-10-03 An injection test was performed on this well. Approximately 400 barrels of fluid were pumped in 1 hour and 3 minutes. The average rate was 6.35 barrels per minute. The maximum pressure was 875 PSI. The pressure at the conclusion of the test was 600 PSI. The pressure was at 525 PSI, 5 minutes after shutdown.
-188703593 2011-08-18 The owner has applied to convert the well to a saltwater injection well. The well site was inspected as part of a field review. There are no water wells or bodies of water within close proximity to the proposed location of surface facilities. The inspe
-1894502968 2012-07-03 My inspection of the well site found no violations at the time.
2050737829 2014-07-25 An inspection of the well and injection facility found no violations.
2055458712 2015-04-12 Complaint# 4989, Marty Cisine. I was on site to witness the clean-up from a brine and oil spill at a injection well storage facility. There were brine trucks removing fluid from trenches on east side of storage facility. There were also brine trucks removing fluid from sump holes near the west side of Sodom Hutchings road. The brine trucks would remove fluid in trenches and sump holes as it collected in them. They would transport the fluid collected to 500 bbl frac tanks on north side of storage facility. The company was injecting fluid into five injection wells from the storage facility the entire time I was on site. I spoke with the workers overseeing the injection of fluid, they told me they had to adjust the volume of fluid being injected due to the pressure rising in the injection wells due to the light fluid. When I left the site there was 3000 bbl's of fluid in the tanks in the storage facility, 3000 bbl's of fluid in six 500 bbl frac tanks on north side of the storage facility and 1000 bbl's of heavy brine being stored in two 500 bbl frac tanks on south side of the pump house. The workers told me they were able to inject 4000 bbl's of fluid into the injection wells in a 24 hour period at this time depending on the current injection rate and pressures.
-2132087981 2012-07-20 My inspection of the well site and injection facility found no violations.
329206871 2012-03-12 My inspection of this site found the dike wall was being constructed. There were no violations noted at the time of inspection.
517272107 2013-08-20 There were no violations at the time of inspection.
556276720 2014-03-17 My inspection of the well found no violations at the time.
562822320 2012-08-14 My inspection of the well site and injection facility found no violations.
59604026 2013-10-10 No violations were found at the time of inspection.
-669971554 2012-12-05 My inspection of the injection facility found no violations. I took a water sample from a brine hauler. The sample was sent to the Cambridge Lab for analysis.
671072835 2014-07-22 An inspection of the well and injection facility found no violations.
-701541984 2014-08-28 There were no violations found at the time of inspection.
707560555 2011-10-19 A Mechanical Integrity Test was performed. The test failed.
748827000 2012-01-10 The pad was being poured for the tank battery. All conditions were acceptable.
803709669 2012-06-06 My inspection of this well site found no violations at the time.
959693422 2011-10-26 A mechanical integrity test was performed on this well and 1235 PSI was put on the tubing/casing annulus. There was a decline in pressure of approximately 5 PSI observed during the 15 minute test period.

For data sources see[2]

References

  1. ↑ "Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS". [1]. 2015-06-19. Retrieved 2015-06-20. 
  2. ↑ "Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS". [2]. 2015-06-19. Retrieved 2015-06-20. 
Retrieved from "https://wellwiki-prod.cloud.arc.gwu.edu/index.php?title=34-155-21438&oldid=3900717"