If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
m |
m |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%" | {| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%" | ||
| Well ID: 34-133-23614 | | Well ID: 34-133-23614 | ||
− | | style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 41. | + | | style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 41.10514278, -81.358228 | width=100% | height=100% }} |
|- | |- | ||
− | | County: | + | | County: [[Portage County, Ohio|Portage]] |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Municipality: | + | | Municipality: |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Operator Name: | + | | Operator Name: [[HECKMAN WATER RES(CVR)INC. O&G]] |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Well Pad ID: | + | | Well Pad ID: |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Farm/Lease Name: | + | | Farm/Lease Name: |
|- | |- | ||
− | | First Permit Date: | + | | First Permit Date: |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Last Permit Date: | + | | Last Permit Date: |
|- | |- | ||
| Spud Date: 1987-10-06 | | Spud Date: 1987-10-06 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Unconventional: | + | | Unconventional: No |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | Configuration: Vertical |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | Well Status: Active Injection |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Violations: | + | | Violations: 0 |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Latitude: 41. | + | | Latitude: 41.10514278 |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Longitude: -81. | + | | Longitude: -81.358228 |
|- | |- | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|} | |} | ||
== Inspection Data == | == Inspection Data == | ||
Line 64: | Line 42: | ||
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID | !scope="col" | VIOLATION ID | ||
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE | !scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE | ||
− | !scope="col" | | + | !scope="col" | VIOLATION COMMENT |
|- | |- | ||
| -1048891859 | | -1048891859 | ||
| 2010-12-16 | | 2010-12-16 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Field Visit or Inspection |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Field Visit or Inspection |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | 2010- | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | Quarterly status check inspection found the | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Field Visit or Inspection |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Phone Call |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Phone Call |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Compliance Notice |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Compliance Notice |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Phone Call |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Compliance Notice |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Field Visit or Inspection |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Phone Call |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | 2010- | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | The | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | - | + | | -1048891859 |
− | | | + | | 2010-12-16 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. |
− | + | | | |
− | + | | | |
− | + | | | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | | | ||
− | | | ||
− | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1093672158 | | 1093672158 | ||
| 2011-05-17 | | 2011-05-17 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Quarterly status check inspection found that the permitted maximum injection pressure (850 psi) had been exceeded and the well was injecting at 1080 psi. I ordered the well shut in and the injection pump shut down. I also advised Ray Pander that if the higher injection pressures are due to injecting fresher water, he may consider applying for a fluid density modification to permit a higher injection pressure. I also advised him that additional reporting and monitoring requirements will apply if he chooses to pursue this modification. | | Quarterly status check inspection found that the permitted maximum injection pressure (850 psi) had been exceeded and the well was injecting at 1080 psi. I ordered the well shut in and the injection pump shut down. I also advised Ray Pander that if the higher injection pressures are due to injecting fresher water, he may consider applying for a fluid density modification to permit a higher injection pressure. I also advised him that additional reporting and monitoring requirements will apply if he chooses to pursue this modification. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1111441938 | | 1111441938 | ||
| 2004-05-04 | | 2004-05-04 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Status check inspection of this salt water disposal well. No violations at this time. | | Status check inspection of this salt water disposal well. No violations at this time. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -112241534 | ||
+ | | 2009-08-19 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1140843101 | ||
+ | | 2010-02-16 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Quarterly status check inspection found the injection pressure exceeded the maximum allowable of 850 psi by 90 psi. I directed the on site operator to shut the system down and monitor the injection pressures more often to avoid any excess values. According to the operator, the well starts on vacuum and pressures slowly build during the injection day. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1152534634 | | 1152534634 | ||
| 2006-07-08 | | 2006-07-08 | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | Pander changed out the tubing string and replaced the packer in this well. The new tubing string is 2-3/8 | + | | Pander changed out the tubing string and replaced the packer in this well. The new tubing string is 2-3/8 upset and the packer is a rebuilt Arrow Lockset. Mixed five gallons of inhibitor in 80 bbl of fresh water and circulated to surface. The new packer was set in compression at 3738'. After setting the packer, pressured up the annulus to 1050 psi and held for 15 minutes. The test passed. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1152798167 | | 1152798167 | ||
| 2006-07-10 | | 2006-07-10 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| The injection system has been re-connected and started. So far injection pressures have been high. I reminded the driver on site that the maximum injection pressure is 850 psi. | | The injection system has been re-connected and started. So far injection pressures have been high. I reminded the driver on site that the maximum injection pressure is 850 psi. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1154391870 | | 1154391870 | ||
| 2006-07-25 | | 2006-07-25 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| The MIT was successfully completed on 7/22 and the well is now back in use. The injection pressures are near 800 psi and the annular pressure is 150 psi. | | The MIT was successfully completed on 7/22 and the well is now back in use. The injection pressures are near 800 psi and the annular pressure is 150 psi. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1188813984 | ||
+ | | 2006-05-03 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Status check inspection found no violations at this time. I did call Pander and asked them to either re-paint or replace the ID sign. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1207113919 | ||
+ | | 2007-05-14 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | When the well was inspected on May 9, the company gauge on the injection side could not be removed and indicated that the injection pressure was 1000 psi. The maximum approved injection pressure is 850 psi. I notified Pander of the problem. On May 14, the injection pressure was 820 psi and the company gauge had been replaced. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1216i108 | | 1216i108 | ||
| 2001-11-28 | | 2001-11-28 | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | Arrived on site as the well was shut down. Pressures on the tubing and annulus are equal. Discussed with the well tender. Waited twenty minutes then turned the pump back on. Pressres went from 760psi to 820psi on both. Told the tender to shut down and determine the cause before injecting again. The tender called in to the office once to notify Ray or Allen, then again to vedrify that they were contacted. THE COMPUTER PROGRAM WILL NOT PERMIT THE ADDITION OF THE CODES VIOLATED. 1509.03 AND OAC 1501:9-3-05 | + | | Arrived on site as the well was shut down. Pressures on the tubing and annulus are equal. Discussed with the well tender. Waited twenty minutes then turned the pump back on. Pressres went from 760psi to 820psi on both. Told the tender to shut down and determine the cause before injecting again. The tender called in to the office once to notify Ray or Allen, then again to vedrify that they were contacted. THE COMPUTER PROGRAM WILL NOT PERMIT THE ADDITION OF THE CODES VIOLATED. 1509.03 AND OAC 1501:9-3-05 |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1216i14 | | 1216i14 | ||
| 2001-08-21 | | 2001-08-21 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Inspection this date revealed no violations. Last inspection date: 05-02-2001 | | Inspection this date revealed no violations. Last inspection date: 05-02-2001 | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1220536557 | | 1220536557 | ||
| 2008-08-14 | | 2008-08-14 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. The well continues to operate at the maximum allowable injection pressure. | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. The well continues to operate at the maximum allowable injection pressure. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1221795349 | | 1221795349 | ||
| 2006-12-07 | | 2006-12-07 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Quarterly inspection of this salt water disposal well found no violations at this time. | | Quarterly inspection of this salt water disposal well found no violations at this time. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1229566074 | ||
+ | | 2006-02-08 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Status check inspection for this salt water disposal well. No violations at this time. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1231266086 | | 1231266086 | ||
| 2014-05-21 | | 2014-05-21 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| The well owner reported an injection line leak. An inspection found a brine impacted area approximately 50 feet by 100 feet. A trench was cut down slope from the injection line and wellhead. The area was flushed with fresh water and the run off was collected in the trench, which was lined with plastic. | | The well owner reported an injection line leak. An inspection found a brine impacted area approximately 50 feet by 100 feet. A trench was cut down slope from the injection line and wellhead. The area was flushed with fresh water and the run off was collected in the trench, which was lined with plastic. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1234072880 | | 1234072880 | ||
| 2003-06-17 | | 2003-06-17 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| UIC status check inspection - no violations at this time. | | UIC status check inspection - no violations at this time. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1243433047 | | 1243433047 | ||
| 2009-05-26 | | 2009-05-26 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| J-Well's service rig pulled the tubing and packer. I met with R.C. Pander on the site and discussed the well. The injection well is shut down until it can be treated on June 4th or 5th. I called Bob Worstall and informed him of the schedule change. | | J-Well's service rig pulled the tubing and packer. I met with R.C. Pander on the site and discussed the well. The injection well is shut down until it can be treated on June 4th or 5th. I called Bob Worstall and informed him of the schedule change. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1246444897 | ||
+ | | 2012-12-19 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | My inspection of the injection facility found no violations. I took a water sample from a brine hauler. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1247599445 | | 1247599445 | ||
| 2009-07-08 | | 2009-07-08 | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | Pander removed the tubing string and packer from this well in order to treat the well for bacteria, crude oil and parafin. The tubing was out of the hole for approximately seven weeks while various treatment proposals were evaluated. The well was ultimately treated with bacteriacide and | + | | Pander removed the tubing string and packer from this well in order to treat the well for bacteria, crude oil and parafin. The tubing was out of the hole for approximately seven weeks while various treatment proposals were evaluated. The well was ultimately treated with bacteriacide and Salty Dog in an attempt to lower injection pressures. On 7/8 Hagen Well Service ran 117 joints of 2-3/8 tubing and two pup joints with a Weatherford Arrow Lockset packer (3692') back in this injection well. Five gallons of inhibitor was mixed with 80 bbl of fresh water. 60 bbl of this mixture was pumped down the annulus between the tubing and the 4-1/2 production casing. The packer was then set in compression. The MIT was completed with an initial pressure of 1015 psi, five minute pressure of 1015 psi, ten minute pressure of 1015 psi and fifteen minute pressure of 1005 psi. After passing the MIT, the annular pressure was manually lowered to 200 psi. The rig was released and moved off location. On 7/9, the annular pressure was 0 psi and the well was on vacuum. As Pander starting injecting, the annular pressure increased to 300 psi and the injection pressure increased to approximately 800 psi. On 7/10, both the annulus and the tubing were on vacuum. Operations were terminated pending evaluation. On 7/14, Moore Well Service rig was on site to correct the pressure leak. While tightening the tubing string by rotation, the packer unseated and another MIT was completed. The initial pressure was 1020 psi, five minute pressure of 1015 psi, ten minute pressure of 1015 psi and fifteen minute pressure of 1015 psi. The second MIT passed. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1252044596 | ||
+ | | 2007-08-24 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. I spoke with the onsite operator about the maximum injection pressures allowed for this well. He said that pressures have been higher than usual lately and that Pander may be planning to acidize the well. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1291640453 | ||
+ | | 2012-11-01 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | My inspection of the injection facility and well found no violations. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 13079107 | | 13079107 | ||
| 2002-04-24 | | 2002-04-24 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Well was not running at time of inspection. NO VIOLATIONS. | | Well was not running at time of inspection. NO VIOLATIONS. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1337326906 | ||
+ | | 2012-08-16 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | My inspection of the well site and injection facility found no violations. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1345574831 | | 1345574831 | ||
| 2012-07-26 | | 2012-07-26 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| My inspection of the well site and injection facility found no violations. The pump was off at the time. | | My inspection of the well site and injection facility found no violations. The pump was off at the time. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1350632747 | ||
+ | | 2013-11-20 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | No violations were found at the time of inspection. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1387849805 | ||
+ | | 2013-09-03 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | My inspection of the well and injection facility found no violations. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1405359860 | | 1405359860 | ||
| 2014-05-19 | | 2014-05-19 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| An inspection of the well and injection facility found no violations. | | An inspection of the well and injection facility found no violations. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 1418969246 | ||
+ | | 2014-07-17 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | No violations were found at the time of inspection. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1506088590 | | 1506088590 | ||
| 2004-08-20 | | 2004-08-20 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Spill clean-up is beginning by flooding the dike with hot water and steam washing the stone. | | Spill clean-up is beginning by flooding the dike with hot water and steam washing the stone. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 1509501906 | ||
+ | | 2014-09-05 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | An inspection found the injection pressure exceeding the maximum allowed. The well tender was instructed to shut down for the day. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1534636428 | | 1534636428 | ||
| 2012-06-15 | | 2012-06-15 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| The injection system was not running at the time of the inspection. My inspection found no violations at the wellhead or at the brine tank battery. | | The injection system was not running at the time of the inspection. My inspection found no violations at the wellhead or at the brine tank battery. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1535445549 | ||
+ | | 2008-11-18 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 1542035898 | ||
+ | | 2014-08-01 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | An inspection of the well and injection facility found no violations. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -154205112 | ||
+ | | 2007-02-12 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1566431563 | ||
+ | | 2014-08-15 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | There was no one onsite and the gate was shut. No violations found. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1567705905 | ||
+ | | 2015-01-12 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | The injection well and surface facility were inspected. There were no violations found at the time. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1583010141 | ||
+ | | 2009-11-19 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1621016030 | ||
+ | | 2003-02-28 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Status check inspection of salt water injection well. The system was not running during the inspection. No violations at this time. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1640620463 | | 1640620463 | ||
| 2007-05-09 | | 2007-05-09 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Quarterly status check found that the injection pressure (1000 psi) exceeds the maximum allowable of 850 psi. I could not remove Pander's gauge to verify the pressure using the MRM gauge. The injection pressure therefore was obtained from their gauge. I contacted Pander and requested that they shut the system down until the injection pressure is controlled and the accuracy of the gauge is verified. | | Quarterly status check found that the injection pressure (1000 psi) exceeds the maximum allowable of 850 psi. I could not remove Pander's gauge to verify the pressure using the MRM gauge. The injection pressure therefore was obtained from their gauge. I contacted Pander and requested that they shut the system down until the injection pressure is controlled and the accuracy of the gauge is verified. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 164765471 | | 164765471 | ||
| 2008-02-25 | | 2008-02-25 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. On Monday March 3, Producers Services is scheduled to inject 3000 gallons of 15% acid to try and open up the perforations and reduce the overall injection pressures. | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. On Monday March 3, Producers Services is scheduled to inject 3000 gallons of 15% acid to try and open up the perforations and reduce the overall injection pressures. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1710782553 | ||
+ | | 2010-08-24 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | The requested changes were made to the wellhead and the injection pressure was recorded. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1785547444 | ||
+ | | 2014-05-22 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | A mechanical integrity test was performed on the new injection line. The injection line held 980 psi. for 15 minutes without any loss. The soil remediation was completed and the area was graded. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 1792630664 | ||
+ | | 2015-01-23 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | The injection well and surface facility were inspected. There were no violations found at the time. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1804986150 | | 1804986150 | ||
| 2014-03-21 | | 2014-03-21 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Pressure readings were taken, while the pump was operating. There were no violations at the time of inspection. | | Pressure readings were taken, while the pump was operating. There were no violations at the time of inspection. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1853584109 | ||
+ | | 2006-07-22 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Pander removed the packer that was set two weeks ago after there were indications that it was failing during brine injection. The packer had been set in compression and passed the MIT performed on July 8. Pander again ran a rebuilt Arrow Lockset packer in compression. The packer was set at 3712'. The MIT was condudcted at 940 psi with no loss of pressure after 15 minutes. The test passed. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1868904508 | | 1868904508 | ||
| 2005-02-25 | | 2005-02-25 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Status check inspection of this salt water disposal well and storage system. No violations at this time. | | Status check inspection of this salt water disposal well and storage system. No violations at this time. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 1871500573 | ||
+ | | 2014-09-19 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | An inspection of the well and injection facility found no violations. The facility was closed at the time. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2026418893 | | 2026418893 | ||
| 2010-05-05 | | 2010-05-05 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Quarterly status check inspection found no violaitons at this time. | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violaitons at this time. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2034757622 | | 2034757622 | ||
| 2014-04-18 | | 2014-04-18 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| The pump was shut off approximately half an hour prior to inspection. There were no violations at the time. | | The pump was shut off approximately half an hour prior to inspection. There were no violations at the time. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2045054076 | | 2045054076 | ||
| 2002-11-13 | | 2002-11-13 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Injection pressure 150 PSI. System was not running. System needs to be checked when running to resolve N.O.V. | | Injection pressure 150 PSI. System was not running. System needs to be checked when running to resolve N.O.V. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -2067573564 | ||
+ | | 2014-11-24 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | The injection well and surface facility were inspected. There were no violations found at the time. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2135549648 | | 2135549648 | ||
| 2002-10-28 | | 2002-10-28 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| FOLLOW UP TO NOV # 2154i536 Injection well was running at the time of the inspection. Injection pressure was 920 PSI. This exceeded the allowable injection pressure of 850 PSI. The well was immediately shut down at the Inspector's request by the operator (Jeff) at the site. Inspect | | FOLLOW UP TO NOV # 2154i536 Injection well was running at the time of the inspection. Injection pressure was 920 PSI. This exceeded the allowable injection pressure of 850 PSI. The well was immediately shut down at the Inspector's request by the operator (Jeff) at the site. Inspect | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2154i188 | | 2154i188 | ||
| 2002-05-30 | | 2002-05-30 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Water in tank battery is gone. Crude oil staining exists inside tank battery dike at previous water line. | | Water in tank battery is gone. Crude oil staining exists inside tank battery dike at previous water line. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2154i239 | | 2154i239 | ||
| 2002-06-24 | | 2002-06-24 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| 4-29-02 Called Pander Trucking and informed them that there was crude oil on the water within the tank battery dike and requested it to be cleaned up. 5-28-02 Water in the tank battery dike was gone, but there was crude staining on the soil within the tank battery dike. 6-24-02 System was not running. Crude oil was floating on the water within the tank battery dike and the soil staining was still present. The dike area needs to be cleaned up. Ray Pander Trucking 330-654-2500. | | 4-29-02 Called Pander Trucking and informed them that there was crude oil on the water within the tank battery dike and requested it to be cleaned up. 5-28-02 Water in the tank battery dike was gone, but there was crude staining on the soil within the tank battery dike. 6-24-02 System was not running. Crude oil was floating on the water within the tank battery dike and the soil staining was still present. The dike area needs to be cleaned up. Ray Pander Trucking 330-654-2500. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2154i310 | | 2154i310 | ||
| 2002-07-23 | | 2002-07-23 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Tank battery dike has not been cleaned up. System was not running. | | Tank battery dike has not been cleaned up. System was not running. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2154i382 | | 2154i382 | ||
| 2002-08-20 | | 2002-08-20 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| N.O.V. RESOLVED. System was not running. NO VIOLATIONS. | | N.O.V. RESOLVED. System was not running. NO VIOLATIONS. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2154i47 | | 2154i47 | ||
| 2002-02-25 | | 2002-02-25 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Well not running the day of the inspection. No Violations. | | Well not running the day of the inspection. No Violations. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2154i536 | | 2154i536 | ||
| 2002-10-28 | | 2002-10-28 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Injection well was running at the time of the inspection. Injection pressure was 920 PSI. This exceeded the allowable injection pressure of 850 PSI. The well was immediately shut down at the Inspector's request by the operator (Jeff) at the site. Inspector Claus informed Pander Trucking (Alan) of the violation. | | Injection well was running at the time of the inspection. Injection pressure was 920 PSI. This exceeded the allowable injection pressure of 850 PSI. The well was immediately shut down at the Inspector's request by the operator (Jeff) at the site. Inspector Claus informed Pander Trucking (Alan) of the violation. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -244293268 | ||
+ | | 2014-06-04 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | There were no violations at the time of inspection. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -265559582 | ||
+ | | 2004-11-18 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Status check inspection - no violations at this time. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -277579850 | ||
+ | | 2003-10-03 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Follow up UIC inspection to check pressures and to confirm that the valve on the injection side had been replaced. No violations at this time. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -33243698 | ||
+ | | 2009-03-20 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | The valve on the 8-5/8 annulus has been replaced, as requested. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -353724650 | ||
+ | | 2003-09-03 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Status check inspection - no violations at this time. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -362248018 | ||
+ | | 2005-06-01 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Status check inspection for this salt water disposal well. No violations at this time. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 375283723 | | 375283723 | ||
| 2012-12-10 | | 2012-12-10 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| The well owner performed a mechanical integrity test on the well. My inspection of the injection well found no violations. | | The well owner performed a mechanical integrity test on the well. My inspection of the injection well found no violations. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -422238234 | ||
+ | | 2005-08-25 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Status check inspection - no violations at this time. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -433447773 | ||
+ | | 2010-08-17 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | The quarterly status check inspection found a discrepency between the wellhead pressure gauge and the gauge on the injection pump. I asked Pander to replace the pressure gauge on the wellhead and place a tapped bull plug and needle valve for the MRM gauge off of the wellhead. I will check the pressures after this request has been honored. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -458804002 | ||
+ | | 2013-12-27 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | No violations were found at the time of inspection. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 468476655 | | 468476655 | ||
| 2013-06-17 | | 2013-06-17 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| My inspection of the well and surface facility found no violations. | | My inspection of the well and surface facility found no violations. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 485125670 | | 485125670 | ||
| 2005-12-01 | | 2005-12-01 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Status check inspection of this salt water injection well. No violations at this time. | | Status check inspection of this salt water injection well. No violations at this time. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 507242629 | | 507242629 | ||
| 2011-02-24 | | 2011-02-24 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressures remain at the maximum allowable limits. | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressures remain at the maximum allowable limits. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 574142539 | | 574142539 | ||
| 2006-07-05 | | 2006-07-05 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| J-Well is on site to replace the tubing string and the packer in this well. No violations at this time. | | J-Well is on site to replace the tubing string and the packer in this well. No violations at this time. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -574805034 | ||
+ | | 2014-05-07 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | There were no violations found at the time of inspection. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 63347918 | | 63347918 | ||
| 2004-08-26 | | 2004-08-26 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| The violation has been corrected | | The violation has been corrected | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -637314486 | ||
+ | | 2014-06-19 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | An inspection of the well and injection facility found no violations. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 644171734 | | 644171734 | ||
| 2007-12-03 | | 2007-12-03 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -663199401 | ||
+ | | 2012-03-06 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | The injection pressure was exceeding the maximum allowed. The well owner shut down immediately. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 676108043 | | 676108043 | ||
| 2001-11-28 | | 2001-11-28 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| FOLLOW UP TO NOV # 1216i108 Arrived on site as the well was shut down. Pressures on the tubing and annulus are equal. Discussed with the well tender. Waited twenty minutes then turned the pump back on. Pressres went from 760psi to 820psi on both. Told the tender to shut down and de | | FOLLOW UP TO NOV # 1216i108 Arrived on site as the well was shut down. Pressures on the tubing and annulus are equal. Discussed with the well tender. Waited twenty minutes then turned the pump back on. Pressres went from 760psi to 820psi on both. Told the tender to shut down and de | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -682073966 | ||
+ | | 2008-05-12 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -687040337 | ||
+ | | 2004-02-11 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Status check inspection - no violations at this time. 790# injection and 900# annulus. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -71014784 | ||
+ | | 2004-08-10 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Status check inspection - one of the brine tanks had been overfilled and impacted the tank battery. Both free oil and brine were still present on the dike floor. I contacted Ray Pander and informed him of the violation. A new check valve had been installed and did not have a needle valve to check the injection pressure. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -743293211 | ||
+ | | 2015-03-02 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | The injection well and surface facility were inspected. There were no violations found at the time. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 749327128 | | 749327128 | ||
| 2012-03-08 | | 2012-03-08 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| My inspection of this well site found thet the pressure on the tubing was zero, the pump was shut off and the gate was locked. | | My inspection of this well site found thet the pressure on the tubing was zero, the pump was shut off and the gate was locked. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -796359438 | ||
+ | | 2009-06-10 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | The tubing is out of the hole and they are waiting for a service rig to swab the well. Pander is still trying to improve the injection characteristics of this well. A MIT will be completed after the tubing and packer are placed back in the hole. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -806253113 | ||
+ | | 2011-08-03 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | I performed the quarterly UIC test on the annulus and the injection. The well was running and the maximum pressure was exceeded by 90psi. I had the well shut in. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 834421028 | | 834421028 | ||
| 2013-03-08 | | 2013-03-08 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| My inspection of the injection facility and well found no violations. The pump was off at the time. | | My inspection of the injection facility and well found no violations. The pump was off at the time. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -83764055 | ||
+ | | 2009-02-24 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Status check inspection found no violations at this time. I called Pander and requested that they change the 2 ball valve on the annulus. I could not open it to check annular pressure. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -902973724 | ||
+ | | 2013-10-09 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | No violations were found at the time of inspection. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 918916743 | | 918916743 | ||
| 2009-07-07 | | 2009-07-07 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| Hagen Well Service is on site to reset the packer and conduct the mechanocal intregity test. Both are scheduled for 7/8 at approximately 9:00 am. | | Hagen Well Service is on site to reset the packer and conduct the mechanocal intregity test. Both are scheduled for 7/8 at approximately 9:00 am. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 919801833 | ||
+ | | 2014-10-23 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | The injection well and surface facility were inspected. The front gate was closed. There were no violations found at the time. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 932523482 | | 932523482 | ||
| 2012-07-18 | | 2012-07-18 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| My inspection of the well site and injection facility found no violations. The pump was off at the time. | | My inspection of the well site and injection facility found no violations. The pump was off at the time. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 979546307 | | 979546307 | ||
| 2011-11-01 | | 2011-11-01 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| I performed the quarterly UIC test on the annulus and the injection. The well was not running. There were no violations at this time. | | I performed the quarterly UIC test on the annulus and the injection. The well was not running. There were no violations at this time. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| iTOMK000078 | | iTOMK000078 | ||
| 1999-05-27 | | 1999-05-27 | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| PL5850 | | PL5850 | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
| Preliminary Restoration done information from Data Point | | Preliminary Restoration done information from Data Point | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| UIC1105 | | UIC1105 | ||
| 1991-05-30 | | 1991-05-30 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| 1509.03 RULES & REG. ENFORCE | | 1509.03 RULES & REG. ENFORCE | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| UIC1106 | | UIC1106 | ||
| 1991-05-30 | | 1991-05-30 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| 1501:9-1-07 CONTAM. & POLLUTION | | 1501:9-1-07 CONTAM. & POLLUTION | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| UIC1107 | | UIC1107 | ||
| 1991-05-30 | | 1991-05-30 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| 1501:9-03-05 (A) (6) | | 1501:9-03-05 (A) (6) | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| UIC1215 | | UIC1215 | ||
| 1991-12-17 | | 1991-12-17 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| 1509.03 RULES & REGULATIONS | | 1509.03 RULES & REGULATIONS | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| UIC1701 | | UIC1701 | ||
| 1998-02-03 | | 1998-02-03 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| 1501: 9-3-07 (D) EXCEEDED MAX.INJ PSI | | 1501: 9-3-07 (D) EXCEEDED MAX.INJ PSI | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| UIC1702 | | UIC1702 | ||
| 1998-02-03 | | 1998-02-03 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| 1509.03 EXCEED MAX.INJ PSI | | 1509.03 EXCEED MAX.INJ PSI | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| UIC1707 | | UIC1707 | ||
| 1997-12-09 | | 1997-12-09 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| 1501: 9-3-07 (D) EXCEED MAX INJ PSI | | 1501: 9-3-07 (D) EXCEED MAX INJ PSI | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | For data sources see<ref>{{cite web | ||
+ | | title = Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS | ||
+ | | publisher = [http://oilandgas.ohiodnr.gov/] | ||
+ | | date = 2015-06-19 | ||
+ | | url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Inspection | ||
+ | | accessdate = 2015-06-20 }}</ref> | ||
+ | == References == | ||
+ | {{reflist}} | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
[[Category:Wells]] | [[Category:Wells]] |
Well ID: 34-133-23614 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":41.10514278,"lon":-81.358228,"icon":""}]} |
County: Portage | |
Municipality: | |
Operator Name: HECKMAN WATER RES(CVR)INC. O&G | |
Well Pad ID: | |
Farm/Lease Name: | |
First Permit Date: | |
Last Permit Date: | |
Spud Date: 1987-10-06 | |
Unconventional: No | |
Configuration: Vertical | |
Well Status: Active Injection | |
Violations: 0 | |
Latitude: 41.10514278 | |
Longitude: -81.358228 |
INSPECTION ID | DATE | DESCRIPTION | COMMENT | VIOLATION ID | VIOLATION CODE | VIOLATION COMMENT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | Field Visit or Inspection | |||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | Field Visit or Inspection | |||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | ||||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | Field Visit or Inspection | |||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | Phone Call | |||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | Phone Call | |||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | Compliance Notice | |||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | Compliance Notice | |||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | Phone Call | |||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | Compliance Notice | |||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | Field Visit or Inspection | |||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | Phone Call | |||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | ||||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | ||||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | ||||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | ||||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | ||||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | ||||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | ||||
-1048891859 | 2010-12-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressure at the wellhead (970 psi) exceeded the allowable (850 psi) and the company shut the injection pump down. The pressure gauge at the injection pump indicated a pressure closer to 900 psi. The well reportedly is on vacuum at the start of the day and quickly builds to the maximum allowable injection pressure. The pressures need to be checked more often. | ||||
1093672158 | 2011-05-17 | Quarterly status check inspection found that the permitted maximum injection pressure (850 psi) had been exceeded and the well was injecting at 1080 psi. I ordered the well shut in and the injection pump shut down. I also advised Ray Pander that if the higher injection pressures are due to injecting fresher water, he may consider applying for a fluid density modification to permit a higher injection pressure. I also advised him that additional reporting and monitoring requirements will apply if he chooses to pursue this modification. | ||||
1111441938 | 2004-05-04 | Status check inspection of this salt water disposal well. No violations at this time. | ||||
-112241534 | 2009-08-19 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. | ||||
-1140843101 | 2010-02-16 | Quarterly status check inspection found the injection pressure exceeded the maximum allowable of 850 psi by 90 psi. I directed the on site operator to shut the system down and monitor the injection pressures more often to avoid any excess values. According to the operator, the well starts on vacuum and pressures slowly build during the injection day. | ||||
1152534634 | 2006-07-08 | Pander changed out the tubing string and replaced the packer in this well. The new tubing string is 2-3/8 upset and the packer is a rebuilt Arrow Lockset. Mixed five gallons of inhibitor in 80 bbl of fresh water and circulated to surface. The new packer was set in compression at 3738'. After setting the packer, pressured up the annulus to 1050 psi and held for 15 minutes. The test passed. | ||||
1152798167 | 2006-07-10 | The injection system has been re-connected and started. So far injection pressures have been high. I reminded the driver on site that the maximum injection pressure is 850 psi. | ||||
1154391870 | 2006-07-25 | The MIT was successfully completed on 7/22 and the well is now back in use. The injection pressures are near 800 psi and the annular pressure is 150 psi. | ||||
-1188813984 | 2006-05-03 | Status check inspection found no violations at this time. I did call Pander and asked them to either re-paint or replace the ID sign. | ||||
-1207113919 | 2007-05-14 | When the well was inspected on May 9, the company gauge on the injection side could not be removed and indicated that the injection pressure was 1000 psi. The maximum approved injection pressure is 850 psi. I notified Pander of the problem. On May 14, the injection pressure was 820 psi and the company gauge had been replaced. | ||||
1216i108 | 2001-11-28 | Arrived on site as the well was shut down. Pressures on the tubing and annulus are equal. Discussed with the well tender. Waited twenty minutes then turned the pump back on. Pressres went from 760psi to 820psi on both. Told the tender to shut down and determine the cause before injecting again. The tender called in to the office once to notify Ray or Allen, then again to vedrify that they were contacted. THE COMPUTER PROGRAM WILL NOT PERMIT THE ADDITION OF THE CODES VIOLATED. 1509.03 AND OAC 1501:9-3-05 | ||||
1216i14 | 2001-08-21 | Inspection this date revealed no violations. Last inspection date: 05-02-2001 | ||||
1220536557 | 2008-08-14 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. The well continues to operate at the maximum allowable injection pressure. | ||||
1221795349 | 2006-12-07 | Quarterly inspection of this salt water disposal well found no violations at this time. | ||||
-1229566074 | 2006-02-08 | Status check inspection for this salt water disposal well. No violations at this time. | ||||
1231266086 | 2014-05-21 | The well owner reported an injection line leak. An inspection found a brine impacted area approximately 50 feet by 100 feet. A trench was cut down slope from the injection line and wellhead. The area was flushed with fresh water and the run off was collected in the trench, which was lined with plastic. | ||||
1234072880 | 2003-06-17 | UIC status check inspection - no violations at this time. | ||||
1243433047 | 2009-05-26 | J-Well's service rig pulled the tubing and packer. I met with R.C. Pander on the site and discussed the well. The injection well is shut down until it can be treated on June 4th or 5th. I called Bob Worstall and informed him of the schedule change. | ||||
-1246444897 | 2012-12-19 | My inspection of the injection facility found no violations. I took a water sample from a brine hauler. | ||||
1247599445 | 2009-07-08 | Pander removed the tubing string and packer from this well in order to treat the well for bacteria, crude oil and parafin. The tubing was out of the hole for approximately seven weeks while various treatment proposals were evaluated. The well was ultimately treated with bacteriacide and Salty Dog in an attempt to lower injection pressures. On 7/8 Hagen Well Service ran 117 joints of 2-3/8 tubing and two pup joints with a Weatherford Arrow Lockset packer (3692') back in this injection well. Five gallons of inhibitor was mixed with 80 bbl of fresh water. 60 bbl of this mixture was pumped down the annulus between the tubing and the 4-1/2 production casing. The packer was then set in compression. The MIT was completed with an initial pressure of 1015 psi, five minute pressure of 1015 psi, ten minute pressure of 1015 psi and fifteen minute pressure of 1005 psi. After passing the MIT, the annular pressure was manually lowered to 200 psi. The rig was released and moved off location. On 7/9, the annular pressure was 0 psi and the well was on vacuum. As Pander starting injecting, the annular pressure increased to 300 psi and the injection pressure increased to approximately 800 psi. On 7/10, both the annulus and the tubing were on vacuum. Operations were terminated pending evaluation. On 7/14, Moore Well Service rig was on site to correct the pressure leak. While tightening the tubing string by rotation, the packer unseated and another MIT was completed. The initial pressure was 1020 psi, five minute pressure of 1015 psi, ten minute pressure of 1015 psi and fifteen minute pressure of 1015 psi. The second MIT passed. | ||||
-1252044596 | 2007-08-24 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. I spoke with the onsite operator about the maximum injection pressures allowed for this well. He said that pressures have been higher than usual lately and that Pander may be planning to acidize the well. | ||||
-1291640453 | 2012-11-01 | My inspection of the injection facility and well found no violations. | ||||
13079107 | 2002-04-24 | Well was not running at time of inspection. NO VIOLATIONS. | ||||
-1337326906 | 2012-08-16 | My inspection of the well site and injection facility found no violations. | ||||
1345574831 | 2012-07-26 | My inspection of the well site and injection facility found no violations. The pump was off at the time. | ||||
-1350632747 | 2013-11-20 | No violations were found at the time of inspection. | ||||
-1387849805 | 2013-09-03 | My inspection of the well and injection facility found no violations. | ||||
1405359860 | 2014-05-19 | An inspection of the well and injection facility found no violations. | ||||
1418969246 | 2014-07-17 | No violations were found at the time of inspection. | ||||
1506088590 | 2004-08-20 | Spill clean-up is beginning by flooding the dike with hot water and steam washing the stone. | ||||
1509501906 | 2014-09-05 | An inspection found the injection pressure exceeding the maximum allowed. The well tender was instructed to shut down for the day. | ||||
1534636428 | 2012-06-15 | The injection system was not running at the time of the inspection. My inspection found no violations at the wellhead or at the brine tank battery. | ||||
-1535445549 | 2008-11-18 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. | ||||
1542035898 | 2014-08-01 | An inspection of the well and injection facility found no violations. | ||||
-154205112 | 2007-02-12 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. | ||||
-1566431563 | 2014-08-15 | There was no one onsite and the gate was shut. No violations found. | ||||
-1567705905 | 2015-01-12 | The injection well and surface facility were inspected. There were no violations found at the time. | ||||
-1583010141 | 2009-11-19 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. | ||||
-1621016030 | 2003-02-28 | Status check inspection of salt water injection well. The system was not running during the inspection. No violations at this time. | ||||
1640620463 | 2007-05-09 | Quarterly status check found that the injection pressure (1000 psi) exceeds the maximum allowable of 850 psi. I could not remove Pander's gauge to verify the pressure using the MRM gauge. The injection pressure therefore was obtained from their gauge. I contacted Pander and requested that they shut the system down until the injection pressure is controlled and the accuracy of the gauge is verified. | ||||
164765471 | 2008-02-25 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. On Monday March 3, Producers Services is scheduled to inject 3000 gallons of 15% acid to try and open up the perforations and reduce the overall injection pressures. | ||||
-1710782553 | 2010-08-24 | The requested changes were made to the wellhead and the injection pressure was recorded. | ||||
-1785547444 | 2014-05-22 | A mechanical integrity test was performed on the new injection line. The injection line held 980 psi. for 15 minutes without any loss. The soil remediation was completed and the area was graded. | ||||
1792630664 | 2015-01-23 | The injection well and surface facility were inspected. There were no violations found at the time. | ||||
1804986150 | 2014-03-21 | Pressure readings were taken, while the pump was operating. There were no violations at the time of inspection. | ||||
-1853584109 | 2006-07-22 | Pander removed the packer that was set two weeks ago after there were indications that it was failing during brine injection. The packer had been set in compression and passed the MIT performed on July 8. Pander again ran a rebuilt Arrow Lockset packer in compression. The packer was set at 3712'. The MIT was condudcted at 940 psi with no loss of pressure after 15 minutes. The test passed. | ||||
1868904508 | 2005-02-25 | Status check inspection of this salt water disposal well and storage system. No violations at this time. | ||||
1871500573 | 2014-09-19 | An inspection of the well and injection facility found no violations. The facility was closed at the time. | ||||
2026418893 | 2010-05-05 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violaitons at this time. | ||||
2034757622 | 2014-04-18 | The pump was shut off approximately half an hour prior to inspection. There were no violations at the time. | ||||
2045054076 | 2002-11-13 | Injection pressure 150 PSI. System was not running. System needs to be checked when running to resolve N.O.V. | ||||
-2067573564 | 2014-11-24 | The injection well and surface facility were inspected. There were no violations found at the time. | ||||
2135549648 | 2002-10-28 | FOLLOW UP TO NOV # 2154i536 Injection well was running at the time of the inspection. Injection pressure was 920 PSI. This exceeded the allowable injection pressure of 850 PSI. The well was immediately shut down at the Inspector's request by the operator (Jeff) at the site. Inspect | ||||
2154i188 | 2002-05-30 | Water in tank battery is gone. Crude oil staining exists inside tank battery dike at previous water line. | ||||
2154i239 | 2002-06-24 | 4-29-02 Called Pander Trucking and informed them that there was crude oil on the water within the tank battery dike and requested it to be cleaned up. 5-28-02 Water in the tank battery dike was gone, but there was crude staining on the soil within the tank battery dike. 6-24-02 System was not running. Crude oil was floating on the water within the tank battery dike and the soil staining was still present. The dike area needs to be cleaned up. Ray Pander Trucking 330-654-2500. | ||||
2154i310 | 2002-07-23 | Tank battery dike has not been cleaned up. System was not running. | ||||
2154i382 | 2002-08-20 | N.O.V. RESOLVED. System was not running. NO VIOLATIONS. | ||||
2154i47 | 2002-02-25 | Well not running the day of the inspection. No Violations. | ||||
2154i536 | 2002-10-28 | Injection well was running at the time of the inspection. Injection pressure was 920 PSI. This exceeded the allowable injection pressure of 850 PSI. The well was immediately shut down at the Inspector's request by the operator (Jeff) at the site. Inspector Claus informed Pander Trucking (Alan) of the violation. | ||||
-244293268 | 2014-06-04 | There were no violations at the time of inspection. | ||||
-265559582 | 2004-11-18 | Status check inspection - no violations at this time. | ||||
-277579850 | 2003-10-03 | Follow up UIC inspection to check pressures and to confirm that the valve on the injection side had been replaced. No violations at this time. | ||||
-33243698 | 2009-03-20 | The valve on the 8-5/8 annulus has been replaced, as requested. | ||||
-353724650 | 2003-09-03 | Status check inspection - no violations at this time. | ||||
-362248018 | 2005-06-01 | Status check inspection for this salt water disposal well. No violations at this time. | ||||
375283723 | 2012-12-10 | The well owner performed a mechanical integrity test on the well. My inspection of the injection well found no violations. | ||||
-422238234 | 2005-08-25 | Status check inspection - no violations at this time. | ||||
-433447773 | 2010-08-17 | The quarterly status check inspection found a discrepency between the wellhead pressure gauge and the gauge on the injection pump. I asked Pander to replace the pressure gauge on the wellhead and place a tapped bull plug and needle valve for the MRM gauge off of the wellhead. I will check the pressures after this request has been honored. | ||||
-458804002 | 2013-12-27 | No violations were found at the time of inspection. | ||||
468476655 | 2013-06-17 | My inspection of the well and surface facility found no violations. | ||||
485125670 | 2005-12-01 | Status check inspection of this salt water injection well. No violations at this time. | ||||
507242629 | 2011-02-24 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. Injection pressures remain at the maximum allowable limits. | ||||
574142539 | 2006-07-05 | J-Well is on site to replace the tubing string and the packer in this well. No violations at this time. | ||||
-574805034 | 2014-05-07 | There were no violations found at the time of inspection. | ||||
63347918 | 2004-08-26 | The violation has been corrected | ||||
-637314486 | 2014-06-19 | An inspection of the well and injection facility found no violations. | ||||
644171734 | 2007-12-03 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. | ||||
-663199401 | 2012-03-06 | The injection pressure was exceeding the maximum allowed. The well owner shut down immediately. | ||||
676108043 | 2001-11-28 | FOLLOW UP TO NOV # 1216i108 Arrived on site as the well was shut down. Pressures on the tubing and annulus are equal. Discussed with the well tender. Waited twenty minutes then turned the pump back on. Pressres went from 760psi to 820psi on both. Told the tender to shut down and de | ||||
-682073966 | 2008-05-12 | Quarterly status check inspection found no violations at this time. | ||||
-687040337 | 2004-02-11 | Status check inspection - no violations at this time. 790# injection and 900# annulus. | ||||
-71014784 | 2004-08-10 | Status check inspection - one of the brine tanks had been overfilled and impacted the tank battery. Both free oil and brine were still present on the dike floor. I contacted Ray Pander and informed him of the violation. A new check valve had been installed and did not have a needle valve to check the injection pressure. | ||||
-743293211 | 2015-03-02 | The injection well and surface facility were inspected. There were no violations found at the time. | ||||
749327128 | 2012-03-08 | My inspection of this well site found thet the pressure on the tubing was zero, the pump was shut off and the gate was locked. | ||||
-796359438 | 2009-06-10 | The tubing is out of the hole and they are waiting for a service rig to swab the well. Pander is still trying to improve the injection characteristics of this well. A MIT will be completed after the tubing and packer are placed back in the hole. | ||||
-806253113 | 2011-08-03 | I performed the quarterly UIC test on the annulus and the injection. The well was running and the maximum pressure was exceeded by 90psi. I had the well shut in. | ||||
834421028 | 2013-03-08 | My inspection of the injection facility and well found no violations. The pump was off at the time. | ||||
-83764055 | 2009-02-24 | Status check inspection found no violations at this time. I called Pander and requested that they change the 2 ball valve on the annulus. I could not open it to check annular pressure. | ||||
-902973724 | 2013-10-09 | No violations were found at the time of inspection. | ||||
918916743 | 2009-07-07 | Hagen Well Service is on site to reset the packer and conduct the mechanocal intregity test. Both are scheduled for 7/8 at approximately 9:00 am. | ||||
919801833 | 2014-10-23 | The injection well and surface facility were inspected. The front gate was closed. There were no violations found at the time. | ||||
932523482 | 2012-07-18 | My inspection of the well site and injection facility found no violations. The pump was off at the time. | ||||
979546307 | 2011-11-01 | I performed the quarterly UIC test on the annulus and the injection. The well was not running. There were no violations at this time. | ||||
iTOMK000078 | 1999-05-27 | |||||
PL5850 | Preliminary Restoration done information from Data Point | |||||
UIC1105 | 1991-05-30 | 1509.03 RULES & REG. ENFORCE | ||||
UIC1106 | 1991-05-30 | 1501:9-1-07 CONTAM. & POLLUTION | ||||
UIC1107 | 1991-05-30 | 1501:9-03-05 (A) (6) | ||||
UIC1215 | 1991-12-17 | 1509.03 RULES & REGULATIONS | ||||
UIC1701 | 1998-02-03 | 1501: 9-3-07 (D) EXCEEDED MAX.INJ PSI | ||||
UIC1702 | 1998-02-03 | 1509.03 EXCEED MAX.INJ PSI | ||||
UIC1707 | 1997-12-09 | 1501: 9-3-07 (D) EXCEED MAX INJ PSI |
For data sources see[1]