X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

Difference between revisions of "34-155-23732"

m
 
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
| Well ID: 34-155-23732
 
| Well ID: 34-155-23732
−
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 41.2410547985, -80.6419581742 | width=100% | height=100% }}
+
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 41.2410548, -80.64195817 | width=100% | height=100% }}  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| County:
+
| County: [[Trumbull County, Ohio|Trumbull]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Municipality:
+
| Municipality:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Operator Name:
+
| Operator Name: [[KLEESE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCS]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Well Pad ID:
+
| Well Pad ID:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Farm/Lease Name:
+
| Farm/Lease Name:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| First Permit Date:
+
| First Permit Date:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Last Permit Date:
+
| Last Permit Date:  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Spud Date: 2001-01-16
 
| Spud Date: 2001-01-16
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Unconventional:
+
| Unconventional: No
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Horizontal:
+
| Configuration: Vertical
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Producing: No
+
| Well Status: Active Injection
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Violations: 1
+
| Violations: 0
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Latitude: 41.2410547985
+
| Latitude: 41.2410548
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Longitude: -80.6419581742
+
| Longitude: -80.64195817
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 43: Line 43:
 
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
 
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
 
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 +
|-
 +
| 2002-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 10086.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2003-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 7085.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2004-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 6015.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2005-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 6113.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2006-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 4651.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2007-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 4844.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2008-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 6408.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 41.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2010-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 3831.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2011-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 2914.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2012-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 1595.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2013-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 678.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 
|}
 
|}
−
== Waste Data ==
+
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
−
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
+
| title = Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS
−
!scope="col" | PERIOD
+
| publisher = [http://oilandgas.ohiodnr.gov/]
−
!scope="col" | TYPE
+
| date = 2015-06-19
−
!scope="col" | QUANTITY
+
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Production
−
!scope="col" | UNITS
+
| accessdate = 2015-06-20 }}</ref>
−
!scope="col" | DISPOSAL METHOD
 
−
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID
 
−
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY NAME
 
−
!scope="col" | FACILITY CITY
 
−
!scope="col" | FACILITY STATE
 
−
|}
 
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
Line 64: Line 157:
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE
−
!scope="col" | VIOLATION_COMMENT
+
!scope="col" | VIOLATION COMMENT
 
|-
 
|-
 
| -1097147561
 
| -1097147561
 
| 2013-01-29
 
| 2013-01-29
−
|
+
|  
 
| I performed a mechanical integrity test on the well.  A pressure of 1180 psi. was place on the tubing/casing annulus and monitored for fifteen minutes.  The test passed without pressure loss.
 
| I performed a mechanical integrity test on the well.  A pressure of 1180 psi. was place on the tubing/casing annulus and monitored for fifteen minutes.  The test passed without pressure loss.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
| Field Visit or Inspection
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| -1097690365
 
| -1097690365
 
| 2014-06-13
 
| 2014-06-13
−
|
+
|  
 
| The well was found operating over the maximum allowable injection pressure.  Matt Kleese was notified of the issue, in person.  The pump rate was slowed, lowering the injection pressure.
 
| The well was found operating over the maximum allowable injection pressure.  Matt Kleese was notified of the issue, in person.  The pump rate was slowed, lowering the injection pressure.
−
|
+
|  
−
| 9-3-07(D)
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| -116292546
 
| -116292546
 
| 2013-08-20
 
| 2013-08-20
−
|
+
|  
 
| The pressures were gauged while the pump was off.  The operator was instructed to bleed off the annular pressure.
 
| The pressures were gauged while the pump was off.  The operator was instructed to bleed off the annular pressure.
  
 
The pressure on the annulus was decreased to 200 pounds per square inch.
 
The pressure on the annulus was decreased to 200 pounds per square inch.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|-
 
−
|-
 
−
| -7692819
 
−
| 2004-01-08
 
−
|
 
−
| Restoration approved .
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1200033112
 
| 1200033112
 
| 2013-05-14
 
| 2013-05-14
−
|
+
|  
−
| I completed a salt water injection well inspection with ODNR Inspector Steve Ochs.  My inspection found the tubing had 1050 psi and the 4.5" had 435 psi.  The well was surrounded by a locked board-on-board fence with the proper identification sign.  The injection facility was in good operating condition with no water or oil surrounding the diked tanks.
+
| I completed a salt water injection well inspection with ODNR Inspector Steve Ochs.  My inspection found the tubing had 1050 psi and the 4.5 had 435 psi.  The well was surrounded by a locked board-on-board fence with the proper identification sign.  The injection facility was in good operating condition with no water or oil surrounding the diked tanks.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1289032117
 
| 1289032117
 
| 2013-02-07
 
| 2013-02-07
−
|
+
|  
 
| I performed a mechanical integrity test on the flow line between the well and the pump house.  A pressure of 1235 psi. was place on the flow line and monitored for fifteen minutes.  There was no pressure loss observed.
 
| I performed a mechanical integrity test on the flow line between the well and the pump house.  A pressure of 1235 psi. was place on the flow line and monitored for fifteen minutes.  There was no pressure loss observed.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1332802581
 
| 1332802581
 
| 2013-04-04
 
| 2013-04-04
−
|
+
|  
 
| My inspection of the injection facility and well found no violations.  The pump was off at the time pressures were gauged.
 
| My inspection of the injection facility and well found no violations.  The pump was off at the time pressures were gauged.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1344344792
 
| 1344344792
 
| 2012-07-30
 
| 2012-07-30
−
|
+
|  
 
| The well owner has applied to convert the well from production to saltwater injection.  The well site was inspected as part of a field review.  There are no houses within 700 feet of the well.  The lease access road will remain unchanged.  The existing
 
| The well owner has applied to convert the well from production to saltwater injection.  The well site was inspected as part of a field review.  There are no houses within 700 feet of the well.  The lease access road will remain unchanged.  The existing
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1363803958
 
| 1363803958
 
| 2013-03-20
 
| 2013-03-20
−
|
+
|  
 
| I took a sample (SJO-112) from a truck (truck number 006), owned by KDA.  The truck was unloading production water from a Clinton well in Geauga County (Motil #1, GEAU 0909).
 
| I took a sample (SJO-112) from a truck (truck number 006), owned by KDA.  The truck was unloading production water from a Clinton well in Geauga County (Motil #1, GEAU 0909).
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1377567719
 
| 1377567719
 
| 2013-08-21
 
| 2013-08-21
−
|
+
|  
 
| The pressure on the annulus indicates no problem with mechanical integrity.
 
| The pressure on the annulus indicates no problem with mechanical integrity.
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1396051418
 +
| 2015-04-10
 +
|
 +
| Complaint# 4989, Marty Cisine. I was on site to witness the pressure test on the flow line. The company pressured the flow line to 1380 psi and shut-in the flow line. I monitored the pressure for 15 minutes. There was no loss of pressure. The injection of fluid was then allowed to proceed.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1427886559
 +
| 2015-03-31
 +
|
 +
| I was on location for a status check.  During my inspection, I found no violations.  An identification sign was posted.  Board fence around the well was locked.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -1578248809
 +
| 2014-12-29
 +
|
 +
| The injection well and surface facility were inspected.  There were no violations found at the time.
 +
|  
 +
|  
 +
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1702484524
 
| 1702484524
 
| 2013-10-10
 
| 2013-10-10
−
|
+
|
 +
| No violations were found at the time of inspection.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -1722938444
 +
| 2014-07-25
 +
|
 +
| There were no violations found at the time of inspection.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1906776353
 +
| 2014-09-04
 +
|  
 
| No violations were found at the time of inspection.
 
| No violations were found at the time of inspection.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 389158923
 
| 389158923
 
| 2014-03-17
 
| 2014-03-17
−
|
+
|  
 
| On the casing, the valve was frozen and gauge was broken.  The annular pressure was not gauged.  My inspection of the well found no violations at the time.
 
| On the casing, the valve was frozen and gauge was broken.  The annular pressure was not gauged.  My inspection of the well found no violations at the time.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 450331171
 
| 450331171
 
| 2013-05-14
 
| 2013-05-14
−
|
+
|  
 
| My inspection of the well and surface facility found no violations.
 
| My inspection of the well and surface facility found no violations.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 663838011
 
| 663838011
 
| 2011-08-18
 
| 2011-08-18
−
|
+
|  
 
| There were no violations found at the time of my inspection.
 
| There were no violations found at the time of my inspection.
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -7692819
 +
| 2004-01-08
 +
|
 +
| Restoration approved .
 +
|  
 +
|  
 +
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS
 +
| publisher = [http://oilandgas.ohiodnr.gov/]
 +
| date = 2015-06-19
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Inspection
 +
| accessdate = 2015-06-20 }}</ref>
 +
== References ==
 +
{{reflist}}
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
[[Category:Wells]]
 
[[Category:Wells]]

Revision as of 06:18, 16 July 2015

Well Details

Well ID: 34-155-23732
Loading map...
County: Trumbull
Municipality:
Operator Name: KLEESE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCS
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name:
First Permit Date:
Last Permit Date:
Spud Date: 2001-01-16
Unconventional: No
Configuration: Vertical
Well Status: Active Injection
Violations: 0
Latitude: 41.2410548
Longitude: -80.64195817

Production Data

PERIOD GAS QUANTITY GAS PRODUCTION DAYS CONDENSATE QUANTITY CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS OIL QUANTITY OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
2002-0 10086.0 0.0
2003-0 7085.0 0.0
2004-0 6015.0 0.0
2005-0 6113.0 0.0
2006-0 4651.0 0.0
2007-0 4844.0 0.0
2008-0 6408.0 41.0
2010-0 3831.0 0.0
2011-0 2914.0 0.0
2012-0 1595.0 0.0
2013-0 678.0 0.0

For data sources see[1]

Inspection Data

INSPECTION ID DATE DESCRIPTION COMMENT VIOLATION ID VIOLATION CODE VIOLATION COMMENT
-1097147561 2013-01-29 I performed a mechanical integrity test on the well. A pressure of 1180 psi. was place on the tubing/casing annulus and monitored for fifteen minutes. The test passed without pressure loss. Field Visit or Inspection
-1097690365 2014-06-13 The well was found operating over the maximum allowable injection pressure. Matt Kleese was notified of the issue, in person. The pump rate was slowed, lowering the injection pressure.
-116292546 2013-08-20 The pressures were gauged while the pump was off. The operator was instructed to bleed off the annular pressure.

The pressure on the annulus was decreased to 200 pounds per square inch.

1200033112 2013-05-14 I completed a salt water injection well inspection with ODNR Inspector Steve Ochs. My inspection found the tubing had 1050 psi and the 4.5 had 435 psi. The well was surrounded by a locked board-on-board fence with the proper identification sign. The injection facility was in good operating condition with no water or oil surrounding the diked tanks.
1289032117 2013-02-07 I performed a mechanical integrity test on the flow line between the well and the pump house. A pressure of 1235 psi. was place on the flow line and monitored for fifteen minutes. There was no pressure loss observed.
1332802581 2013-04-04 My inspection of the injection facility and well found no violations. The pump was off at the time pressures were gauged.
1344344792 2012-07-30 The well owner has applied to convert the well from production to saltwater injection. The well site was inspected as part of a field review. There are no houses within 700 feet of the well. The lease access road will remain unchanged. The existing
1363803958 2013-03-20 I took a sample (SJO-112) from a truck (truck number 006), owned by KDA. The truck was unloading production water from a Clinton well in Geauga County (Motil #1, GEAU 0909).
1377567719 2013-08-21 The pressure on the annulus indicates no problem with mechanical integrity.
1396051418 2015-04-10 Complaint# 4989, Marty Cisine. I was on site to witness the pressure test on the flow line. The company pressured the flow line to 1380 psi and shut-in the flow line. I monitored the pressure for 15 minutes. There was no loss of pressure. The injection of fluid was then allowed to proceed.
1427886559 2015-03-31 I was on location for a status check. During my inspection, I found no violations. An identification sign was posted. Board fence around the well was locked.
-1578248809 2014-12-29 The injection well and surface facility were inspected. There were no violations found at the time.
1702484524 2013-10-10 No violations were found at the time of inspection.
-1722938444 2014-07-25 There were no violations found at the time of inspection.
1906776353 2014-09-04 No violations were found at the time of inspection.
389158923 2014-03-17 On the casing, the valve was frozen and gauge was broken. The annular pressure was not gauged. My inspection of the well found no violations at the time.
450331171 2013-05-14 My inspection of the well and surface facility found no violations.
663838011 2011-08-18 There were no violations found at the time of my inspection.
-7692819 2004-01-08 Restoration approved .

For data sources see[2]

References

  1. ↑ "Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS". [1]. 2015-06-19. Retrieved 2015-06-20. 
  2. ↑ "Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS". [2]. 2015-06-19. Retrieved 2015-06-20. 
Retrieved from "https://wellwiki-prod.cloud.arc.gwu.edu/index.php?title=34-155-23732&oldid=4245635"