X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

Difference between revisions of "34-035-60966"

m
m
Line 21: Line 21:
 
| License Status: Orphan Well - Ready
 
| License Status: Orphan Well - Ready
 
|-
 
|-
| License Date: 1999-10-01
+
| License Date: 2001-07-27
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Spud Date:  
 
| Spud Date:  

Revision as of 15:58, 25 July 2019

Well Details

Well ID: 34-035-60966
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: Cuyahoga
Municipality: Rockport Township
Operator Name: BISHOP WELL SERVICES CORP.
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: NERO NICK
License Status: Orphan Well - Ready
License Date: 2001-07-27
Spud Date:
Spud Drilling Contractor:
Final Drill Date:
Well Total Depth:
Configuration: Vertical
Latitude: 41.473877662
Longitude: -81.77609158

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
Changed to Orphan Well Ready 1999-10-01 Changed Well To Orphan Ready
APP 2001-07-27 Proposed Formations:CLINTON, Issued Date:7/27/2001, Expired Date:7/27/2002 6:00:00 AM, Drilling unit acres:0, Proposed Well Type:OG, Proposed Well Class:
Plugged/Abandoned 2001-12-14
Construction Permit Expires 2002-07-27
Record Last Modified 2019-03-25

For data sources see[2]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
1526655832 2018-05-17 Orphan No Violations I inspected this well pursuant to a request from a property development contractor, who had discovered the well during site prep and excavation. The well had been plugged and abandoned previously under I &O contract in 12/2001. At the time of this inspection, I observed the following: a 10-inch casing with welded lid, located within an active basement/foundation excavation. The casing riser extended approximately 4 feet above the bottom of the excavation. I met with a representative of the developer (David Payne) and we discussed the status of the well. I advised that the developer should consult with local building and zoning rules regarding new construction in relation to existing wells. The well was not accessible to perform any type of more detailed inspection.

For data sources see[3]

References