If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
m |
m |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| License Status: Producing | | License Status: Producing | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | License Date: | + | | License Date: 1965-02-26 |
|- | |- | ||
| Spud Date: 1965-03-22 | | Spud Date: 1965-03-22 |
Well ID: 34-103-21532 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":41.098354508,"lon":-81.75093454,"icon":""}]} |
Country: United States | |
State: Ohio | |
County: Medina | |
Municipality: Sharon Township | |
Operator Name: KING DRILLING CO | |
Well Pad ID: | |
Farm/Lease Name: JOHNSON WW | |
License Status: Producing | |
License Date: 1965-02-26 | |
Spud Date: 1965-03-22 | |
Spud Drilling Contractor: | |
Final Drill Date: 1965-04-18 | |
Well Total Depth: 3560 ft | |
Configuration: Vertical | |
Latitude: 41.098354508 | |
Longitude: -81.75093454 |
For data sources see[1]
Well Status | Well Status Date | Comment |
---|---|---|
Original Spud | 1965-03-22 | |
Completed | 1965-04-18 | |
Reached Total Depth | 1965-04-18 | |
Record Last Modified | 2013-10-03 |
For data sources see[2]
Perforation Date | Interval Top (ft) | Interval Base (ft) | Number of Shots |
---|---|---|---|
2006-09-11 | 3438 | 3456 | 31 |
2006-09-11 | 3490 | 3500 | 1 |
For data sources see[3]
Stimulation Date | Chemical Agent | Chemical Agent Concentration (%) | Fracking Fluid Volume | Mass of Proppant Used (lb) | Fracking Company | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H2O | 0 | 1500 Bbl | 52000 |
For data sources see[4]
Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|
1984 | KING DRILLING CO | 264 | 0 | 0 |
1985 | KING DRILLING CO | 271 | 0 | 0 |
1986 | KING DRILLING CO | 216 | 0 | 365 |
1993 | KING DRILLING CO | 1427 | 0 | 365 |
1995 | KING DRILLING CO | 1165 | 33 | 365 |
1996 | KING DRILLING CO | 803 | 28 | 365 |
1997 | KING DRILLING CO | 1080 | 29 | 365 |
1998 | KING DRILLING CO | 1016 | 21 | 365 |
1999 | KING DRILLING CO | 1132 | 98 | 365 |
2000 | KING DRILLING CO | 1310 | 74 | 365 |
2001 | KING DRILLING CO | 1413 | 110 | 365 |
2002 | KING DRILLING CO | 1703 | 140 | 365 |
2003 | KING DRILLING CO | 1577 | 92 | 365 |
2004 | KING DRILLING CO | 1444 | 54 | 365 |
2005 | KING DRILLING CO | 1227 | 67 | 365 |
2006 | KING DRILLING CO | 1115 | 48 | 365 |
2007 | KING DRILLING CO | 1107 | 42 | 365 |
2008 | KING DRILLING CO | 1092 | 76 | 365 |
2009 | KING DRILLING CO | 1057 | 36 | 365 |
2010 | KING DRILLING CO | 1104 | 0 | 365 |
2011 | KING DRILLING CO | 1071 | 89 | 365 |
2012 | KING DRILLING CO | 1130 | 48 | 366 |
2013 | KING DRILLING CO | 1382 | 130 | 365 |
2014 | KING DRILLING CO | 1485 | 91 | 365 |
2015 | KING DRILLING CO | 1906 | 191 | 365 |
2016 | KING DRILLING CO | 1891 | 117 | 365 |
2017 | KING DRILLING CO | 1638 | 129 | 365 |
2018 | KING DRILLING CO | 1492 | 80 | 365 |
Period | Operator Name | Waste Type | Quantity (bbl) | Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|
1984 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 0 |
1985 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 0 |
1986 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
1993 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
1995 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
1996 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
1997 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
1998 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
1999 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2000 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2001 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2002 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2003 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2004 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2005 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2006 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2007 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2008 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2009 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2010 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2011 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2012 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 366 |
2013 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2014 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2015 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2016 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2017 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2018 | KING DRILLING CO | Brine | 0 | 365 |
Inspection ID | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
0195605544 | 2014-09-03 | Production Wells | No Violations | Inspected production well on 09/03/2014. The tank battery consists of 1-210 bbl steel tank and 1-vertical separator located within an earthen dike. Well identification is clearly displayed at the tank battery. The well is equipped with a pump jack with an electric motor. No problems were noted at the time of the inspection. |
1359053491 | 2013-01-24 | Production Wells | No Violations | I inspected this well and found one pump jack unit with electric motor on the wellhead. The pressure on the tubing was 60 psi. and the pressure on the casing was 45 psi. No leaks were detected on the wellhead or adjacent piping. The area around the wellhead and pump jack was well maintained. The tank battery contained one 210 bbl. steel oil storage tank and one vertical oil and gas separator unit. The proper identification sign was posted on the tank and no leaks were detected on the tank or piping within the tank battery. The dike was in good shape and the area within and around the tank battery was well maintained. |
For data sources see[9]