X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

Difference between revisions of "34-031-25042"

m
m
Line 11: Line 11:
 
| County: [[Coshocton_County,_Ohio|Coshocton]]
 
| County: [[Coshocton_County,_Ohio|Coshocton]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Municipality: [[Tiverton Township,_Coshocton_County,_Ohio|Tiverton Township]]
+
| Municipality: [[Tiverton_Township,_Coshocton_County,_Ohio|Tiverton Township]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Operator Name: [[LOGSDON ARLENE]]
 
| Operator Name: [[LOGSDON ARLENE]]
Line 33: Line 33:
 
| Configuration: Vertical
 
| Configuration: Vertical
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Latitude: <Latitude>
+
| Latitude: 40.451478531
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Longitude: -82.08914477
 
| Longitude: -82.08914477

Revision as of 07:10, 30 August 2019

Well Details

Well ID: 34-031-25042
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: Coshocton
Municipality: Tiverton Township
Operator Name: LOGSDON ARLENE
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: TERRY L & ARLENE E LOGSDON
License Status: Final Restoration
License Date: 2018-08-30
Spud Date: 1983-04-12
Spud Drilling Contractor: PLATEAU DRLG
Final Drill Date: 1983-04-17
Well Total Depth: 3300 ft
Configuration: Vertical
Latitude: 40.451478531
Longitude: -82.08914477

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
CO 1983-02-16 2182 B-J OF OHIO INC GeoDate 2/16/83
Oil and Gas 1983-02-16 Issued Date 2/16/83 Expired Date 8/15/83 Acres 0020000 Tool Type RTA Proposed Formation CLINTON Proposed Depth 03300 Proposed Drill Depth 03300
Original Spud 1983-04-12 UPDATE LOCATION PER DOGRM SURVEYOR 1/9/19 ALE.
Completed 1983-04-17 UPDATE LOCATION PER DOGRM SURVEYOR 1/9/19 ALE.
Reached Total Depth 1983-04-17 UPDATE LOCATION PER DOGRM SURVEYOR 1/9/19 ALE.
Completion Report Received 1983-09-29 UPDATE LOCATION PER DOGRM SURVEYOR 1/9/19 ALE.
CO 1988-05-05 2948 CRUM ROBERT L GeoDate 5/5/88
Unknown 1988-05-05 Issued Date 5/5/88 Expired Date 5/5/89 Proposed Purpose OG Was Plug Supervised Who Superivsed Plug and Abandon Date
CO 1992-09-01 4359 LOGSDON ARLENE GeoDate 5/5/88
APP 2018-08-30 Proposed Formations:CLINTON, Issued Date:8/30/2018, Expired Date:8/29/2020 12:00:00 PM, Drilling unit acres:20, Proposed Well Type:OG, Proposed Well Class:
Plugged/Abandoned 2018-10-18 UPDATE LOCATION PER DOGRM SURVEYOR 1/9/19 ALE.
Record Last Modified 2019-06-11 UPDATE LOCATION PER DOGRM SURVEYOR 1/9/19 ALE.
Construction Permit Expires 2020-08-29 UPDATE LOCATION PER DOGRM SURVEYOR 1/9/19 ALE.

For data sources see[2]

Perforation Treatments

Perforation Date Interval Top (ft) Interval Base (ft) Number of Shots
1997-06-29 0 0
2006-09-11 3190 3204 13

For data sources see[3]

Stimulations Data

Stimulation Date Chemical Agent Chemical Agent Concentration (%) Fracking Fluid Volume Mass of Proppant Used (lb) Fracking Company Comments
H2O 0 47600 Gal 45000 FRAC;48MG H2O,45M# SD

For data sources see[4]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Oil Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1984 B J INC 2311 420 0
1985 B-J OF OHIO INC 1416 206 365
1988 B-J OF OHIO INC 934 166 344

For data sources see[5] [6]

Waste Data

Period Operator Name Waste Type Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1984 B J INC Brine 173 0
1985 B-J OF OHIO INC Brine 80 365
1988 B-J OF OHIO INC Brine 0 344

For data sources see[7] [8]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
0003666653 2018-10-16 Plug / Plug Back No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that Bakerwell had the 1.5 inch diameter tubing ran to a depth of 3185 feet. They dug and lined a pit and brought in a 300 barrel water tank. Petroset established circulation with fresh water and circulated the oil out of the 4.5 inch casing. They pumped a bottom plug with 30 sacks of class A cement. Circulation was maintained throughout the job. Bakerwell started pulling the tubing out of the well once Petroset finished the plug.
0438086902 2019-05-14 Final Restoration No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the well site and access road were 100% covered in well established grass. All oilfield related materials and debris had been removed. There were no erosion issues and there were no signs that the plugged well was leaking. This site passes final restoration.
1097018215 2018-10-19 Plug / Plug Back No Violations On the day of my inspection I visited the well site with DOGRM Surveyor Tom Smith to record the well location. I found that the well casing had been cut, capped and buried. The pit was closed, and the site had been graded out, seeded and covered in straw. The only equipment left was one 300 barrel water tank and the dozer. Joe Zollars of Bakerwell sent me photos of the plate being placed over the ell casing prior to covering it up.
1539789725 2018-10-17 Plug / Plug Back No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that Bakerwell had all of the tubing pulled out of the well. They ran in with their ripping tools to part the 4.5 inch diameter casing. Joe Zollars found a good telegraph at 2300 feet and parted the casing there. Joe planned to pull the 4.5 inch casing from the well and run the 1.5 inch tubing back in to a depth of 2181 feet for the Big Lime plug. Bakerwell hauled in 225 barrels of fresh water and loaded it into the 300 barrel tank. Petroset is scheduled to set the remaining cement plugs tomorrow.
1539888445 2018-10-18 Plug / Plug Back No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that Bakerwell had the 4.5 inch diameter casing out of the well and the 1.5 inch diameter tubing ran back to a depth of 2157 feet. Petroset established circulation and pumped a 200 foot cement plug with class A cement-2% gel. I weighed a sample of the cement slurry and it was mixed at 15.2 lbs/gal. Circulation was maintained throughout the plug. Bakerwell pulled the tubing up to 901 feet for the plug at the base of the surface casing. Petroset established circulation and pumped a 200 foot cement plug with class A cement-2% gel. Circulation was maintained throughout the plug. Bakerwell pulled the tubing up to 193 feet for the surface plug. Petroset established circulation and started pumping cement. Circulation was lost before we saw any cement to the surface. Bakerwell pulled the remaining tubing from the well and broke down the wellhead. They dropped a rock in the well and estimated the fluid top at 200 feet. Bakerwell and Petroset attempted to set a stone bridge at the top of the fluid. They bridged the well 30 feet down. Bakerwell used their stem and jars to beat the bridge downhole to 150 feet. Petroset pumped cement and filled the well casing to the surface. The cement fell approximately 4 feet down after 30 minutes and then it stabilized.
1789928573 2018-10-15 Plug / Plug Back No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that Bakerwell was rigged up on the well. They were pulling their tubing trailer into place. I met with rig operator Joe Zollars to discuss the plan for plugging the well. Joe said that they suspected the production casing had a hole in it so they were going to plug with 1.5 inch tubing. Joe started running the tubing to the top perforation at 3190 feet. The completion report with the plug permit did not specify whether the surface casing was cemented. The report showed that the well was drilled in 1983 with an air/rotary drilling rig. Joe had a copy of the ODNR record of cementing for t he 4.5 inch diameter casing. That record did indicate that the 7 inch diameter surface casing was cemented. Joe said that they are scheduled to set the bottom plug tomorrow afternoon. I worked with Joe to determine that cement top and the plug depths.

For data sources see[9]

References

  1. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Well, tblLocational, tblPlugWell, tblInspection, tblCivilTownships and tblPad Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2019-05-07. Retrieved 2019-05-21. 
  2. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Well and WellHistry Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2019-05-07. Retrieved 2019-05-21. 
  3. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Perfs Table". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2019-05-07. Retrieved 2019-05-21. 
  4. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - tblStimulation Table". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2019-05-07. Retrieved 2019-05-21. 
  5. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Oil and Gas Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2019-05-07. Retrieved 2019-05-21. 
  6. ↑ "Combined Production - Oil and Gas Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2019-05-07. Retrieved 2019-05-21. 
  7. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Brine Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2019-05-07. Retrieved 2019-05-21. 
  8. ↑ "Combined Production - Brine Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2019-05-07. Retrieved 2019-05-21. 
  9. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - tblInspection, tblInspFail and tblinspFlDesc Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2019-05-07. Retrieved 2019-05-21. 
Retrieved from "https://wellwiki-prod.cloud.arc.gwu.edu/index.php?title=34-031-25042&oldid=8614351"