X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

Difference between revisions of "37-826610"

m
m
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
| Well ID: 37-826610
 
| Well ID: 37-826610
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" |  
+
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="17" |  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Country: United States
 
| Country: United States
Line 13: Line 13:
 
| Municipality: [[Union Township,_Tioga_County,_Pennsylvania|Union Township]]
 
| Municipality: [[Union Township,_Tioga_County,_Pennsylvania|Union Township]]
 
|-
 
|-
| Operator Name: [[]]
+
| Operator Name:  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Well Pad ID:  
 
| Well Pad ID:  
Line 24: Line 24:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Permit Date:  
 
| Permit Date:  
 +
|-
 +
| Well Type:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Unconventional Well: N
 
| Unconventional Well: N
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Configuration:  
 
| Configuration:  
 +
|-
 +
| Conservation: 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Latitude:  
 
| Latitude:  
Line 49: Line 53:
 
  | url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources
 
  | url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources
 
  | accessdate = 2019-05-21 }}</ref>
 
  | accessdate = 2019-05-21 }}</ref>
 +
<!--== Well History ==
 +
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 +
!scope="col" | Date
 +
!scope="col" | Event
 +
|-
 +
|}-->
 +
 
<!--== Fracking Activities ==
 
<!--== Fracking Activities ==
 
==== Fracking Jobs ====
 
==== Fracking Jobs ====
Line 71: Line 82:
 
!scope="col" | Job Percentage by Mass
 
!scope="col" | Job Percentage by Mass
 
!scope="col" | Mass Used (lb)
 
!scope="col" | Mass Used (lb)
 +
|-
 +
|}-->
 +
 +
<!--== Stimulation Data ==
 +
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 +
!scope="col" | Stimulation Date
 +
!scope="col" | Phase Number
 +
!scope="col" | Chemical Agent
 +
!scope="col" | Volume (gal)
 +
!scope="col" | Treating Pressure (psi)
 +
!scope="col" | Breakdown Pressure (psi)
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}-->
 
|}-->

Latest revision as of 15:14, 16 May 2020

Well Details

Well ID: 37-826610
Country: United States
State: Pennsylvania
County: Tioga
Municipality: Union Township
Operator Name:
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: WESNESKI 724 ALT ST
License Status:
Spud Date:
Permit Date:
Well Type:
Unconventional Well: N
Configuration:
Conservation:
Latitude:
Longitude:

For data sources see[1][2][3]



Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Category Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
2790934 Primary Facility 2018-10-17 Routine/Complete Inspection Pending I met Luke Chesner and Marc McCartor of Rockdale when I arrived. The frac was temporarily on hold because there was not yet enough water in the MASS to begin the next stages. The area around the MASS looked good overall, with all puddles on the ground surface showing low conductance (.11-.56 mS/ cm). One of the large pump containments had several inches of water in it that showed slightly elevated conductance (2.56 mS/cm). Walking around the sitewide containment, the liner and berms appeared to be in good condition, and most puddles were low in conductance (.4-.83 mS/cm). Large (approximately 12" diameter) collapsible hoses were run from the MASS onto the sitewide containment, and one of these hoses was compressing a foam berm. When I informed Luke, he told me he would have the containment vacced and prop up the 12" water line over the berm. A vac truck was working on the sitewide containment caddy corner from the entrance; immediately outside of this containment I discovered an approximately 15-20 ga
2825019 Primary Facility 2019-01-09 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted Light activity on the site when I arrived. 2 temporary sand separators currently hooked up to the recently fraced wells. The onsite modular storage structure was still present, but a worker was pumping water from the tank to a bank of Baker tanks in containment. The area around the MASS was dry, and a downgradient sediment trap nearby showed low conductance (.13 mS/cm). A truck loading area at the Baker tanks had a 10' x 5' (1-2" deep) in front of it that showed slightly elevated conductance; I recommend that the puddle be vacced. The area where I noted fluid with elevated conductance on my 10/17/18 inspection had recently had fresh gravel placed on it.

For data sources see[4]

References