If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
m |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%" | {| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%" | ||
| Well ID: 37-005-30447 | | Well ID: 37-005-30447 | ||
| − | | style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan=" | + | | style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 40.625344, -79.362335 | width=100% | height=100% }} |
| + | |- | ||
| + | | County: [[Armstrong County, Pennsylvania|Armstrong]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Municipality: [[South Bend Township, Armstrong County, Pennsylvania|South Bend Township]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Operator Name: [[PENNECO OIL CO INC]] | | Operator Name: [[PENNECO OIL CO INC]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Well Pad ID: | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Farm/Lease Name: G TOY 1 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| First Permit Date: 2009-12-15 | | First Permit Date: 2009-12-15 | ||
| Line 17: | Line 25: | ||
| Horizontal: No | | Horizontal: No | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Violations: | + | | Well Status: ACTIVE |
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Violations: 0 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Latitude: 40.625344 | | Latitude: 40.625344 | ||
| Line 34: | Line 44: | ||
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS | !scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | 2009-0 |
| − | | style="text-align:right;" | | + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 |
| − | | style="text-align:right;" | | + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 |
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| Line 43: | Line 53: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | 2010-0 |
| − | | style="text-align:right;" | | + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 |
| − | | style="text-align:right;" | | + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 |
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| Line 61: | Line 71: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | 2012-0 |
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 3504.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 366.0 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 2013-0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 2254.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| Line 70: | Line 89: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | 2014-0 |
| − | | style="text-align:right;" | | + | | style="text-align:right;" | 1473.0 |
| − | | style="text-align:right;" | | + | | style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 |
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| Line 79: | Line 98: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | For data sources see<ref>{{cite web | ||
| + | | title = Oil and Gas Historical Production Report | ||
| + | | publisher = [[Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection]] | ||
| + | | date = 2015-05-26 | ||
| + | | url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Production | ||
| + | | accessdate = 2015-05-27 }}</ref> | ||
== Waste Data == | == Waste Data == | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%" | {| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%" | ||
| Line 90: | Line 115: | ||
!scope="col" | FACILITY CITY | !scope="col" | FACILITY CITY | ||
!scope="col" | FACILITY STATE | !scope="col" | FACILITY STATE | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| 2010-0 | | 2010-0 | ||
| DRILLING FLUID WASTE | | DRILLING FLUID WASTE | ||
| − | | style="text-align:right;" | | + | | style="text-align:right;" | 1.0 |
| Bbl | | Bbl | ||
| CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | ||
| PA0091472 | | PA0091472 | ||
| − | | TUNNELTON LIQUIDS | + | | TUNNELTON LIQUIDS TREATMENT FACILITY |
| SALTSBURG | | SALTSBURG | ||
| PA | | PA | ||
| Line 119: | Line 133: | ||
| CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | ||
| PA0095443 | | PA0095443 | ||
| − | | | + | | CREEKSIDE TREATMENT FACILITY |
| CREEKSIDE | | CREEKSIDE | ||
| PA | | PA | ||
| Line 130: | Line 144: | ||
| CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | ||
| PA0101508 | | PA0101508 | ||
| − | | | + | | FLUID RECOVERY SERVICE FRANKLIN FACILITY |
| FRANKLIN | | FRANKLIN | ||
| + | | PA | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 2014-0 | ||
| + | | PRODUCED FLUID | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 25.0 | ||
| + | | Bbl | ||
| + | | CENT WASTE TRT FAC NPDES DISCHARGE | ||
| + | | PA0095443 | ||
| + | | CREEKSIDE TREATMENT FACILITY | ||
| + | | CREEKSIDE | ||
| PA | | PA | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | For data sources see<ref>{{cite web | ||
| + | | title = Oil and Gas Historical Waste Report | ||
| + | | publisher = [[Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection]] | ||
| + | | date = 2015-05-26 | ||
| + | | url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Waste | ||
| + | | accessdate = 2015-05-26 }}</ref> | ||
== Inspection Data == | == Inspection Data == | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%" | {| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%" | ||
| Line 142: | Line 173: | ||
!scope="col" | COMMENT | !scope="col" | COMMENT | ||
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID | !scope="col" | VIOLATION ID | ||
| + | !scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE | ||
| + | !scope="col" | VIOLATION_COMMENT | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1847093 | | 1847093 | ||
| Line 147: | Line 180: | ||
| No Violations Noted | | No Violations Noted | ||
| Site inspection and E&S plan review found issues with the utilization of encaspulation and below grade drill pits and the depth to the seasonal high groundwater table. A revised E&S plan was submitted addressing those issues through land farming and elevated drill pits, and additional contingency options should during site construction it be discovered that landfarming and or pits will not be able to be utilized, steel tanks will be utilized and the cuttings will be hauled to a landfill. The remainder of the E&S plan, as compiled, should effectively minimize accelerated erosion & sedimentation, provided the plan is implemented and maintained properly. | | Site inspection and E&S plan review found issues with the utilization of encaspulation and below grade drill pits and the depth to the seasonal high groundwater table. A revised E&S plan was submitted addressing those issues through land farming and elevated drill pits, and additional contingency options should during site construction it be discovered that landfarming and or pits will not be able to be utilized, steel tanks will be utilized and the cuttings will be hauled to a landfill. The remainder of the E&S plan, as compiled, should effectively minimize accelerated erosion & sedimentation, provided the plan is implemented and maintained properly. | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 154: | Line 189: | ||
| No Violations Noted | | No Violations Noted | ||
| Site had been constructed as outlined in the E&S plan. Silt fencing and haybales required replacement. Spoke with operator representative Robert Carnahan onsite and silt sox will be installed on 09/27/10. No accelerated erosion & sedimentation was observed in relation to the well-site or access road. Below grade pit onsite and it had more than the required two feet of lined freeboard. Operator should endeavor to reclaim the site and close the pit upon completion of drilling and any stimulation activities and implement BMP's as necessary to insure erosion & sedimentation is minimized through the fall and winter months. | | Site had been constructed as outlined in the E&S plan. Silt fencing and haybales required replacement. Spoke with operator representative Robert Carnahan onsite and silt sox will be installed on 09/27/10. No accelerated erosion & sedimentation was observed in relation to the well-site or access road. Below grade pit onsite and it had more than the required two feet of lined freeboard. Operator should endeavor to reclaim the site and close the pit upon completion of drilling and any stimulation activities and implement BMP's as necessary to insure erosion & sedimentation is minimized through the fall and winter months. | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 161: | Line 198: | ||
| No Violations Noted | | No Violations Noted | ||
| Drilling appeared to have been completed at the time of the inspection. Silt fencing has been replaced with silt sox for erosion control. No accelerated erosion & sedimentation was observed in relation to the access road or well-site. Below grade drill pit located onsite and it had more than the required two feet of lined freeboard. | | Drilling appeared to have been completed at the time of the inspection. Silt fencing has been replaced with silt sox for erosion control. No accelerated erosion & sedimentation was observed in relation to the access road or well-site. Below grade drill pit located onsite and it had more than the required two feet of lined freeboard. | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 168: | Line 207: | ||
| No Violations Noted | | No Violations Noted | ||
| drilling - 798ft/E&S ok/ID&pit ok | | drilling - 798ft/E&S ok/ID&pit ok | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 175: | Line 216: | ||
| No Violations Noted | | No Violations Noted | ||
| Drilling complete/. Well equipped for production.Site graded and mulched. No open pits. | | Drilling complete/. Well equipped for production.Site graded and mulched. No open pits. | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 182: | Line 225: | ||
| No Violations Noted | | No Violations Noted | ||
| ell appeared to be equipped for production at the time of the inspection. Brine tank located onsite and it appeared to be in sound condition. Site had been properly restored and the vegetative cover met the 70% uniform coverage criteria. There was no observed accelerated erosion or sedimentation in relation to the site or access road. | | ell appeared to be equipped for production at the time of the inspection. Brine tank located onsite and it appeared to be in sound condition. Site had been properly restored and the vegetative cover met the 70% uniform coverage criteria. There was no observed accelerated erosion or sedimentation in relation to the site or access road. | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | ==References== | + | For data sources see<ref>{{cite web |
| − | {{ | + | | title = Oil and Gas Historical Inspection Report |
| − | + | | publisher = [[Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection]] | |
| + | | date = 2015-05-26 | ||
| + | | url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Inspections | ||
| + | | accessdate = 2015-05-27 }}</ref> | ||
| + | == References == | ||
| + | {{reflist}} | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
[[Category:Wells]] | [[Category:Wells]] | ||
| Well ID: 37-005-30447 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":40.625344,"lon":-79.362335,"icon":""}]} |
| County: Armstrong | |
| Municipality: South Bend Township | |
| Operator Name: PENNECO OIL CO INC | |
| Well Pad ID: | |
| Farm/Lease Name: G TOY 1 | |
| First Permit Date: 2009-12-15 | |
| Last Permit Date: 2009-12-15 | |
| Spud Date: 2010-09-21 | |
| Unconventional: No | |
| Horizontal: No | |
| Well Status: ACTIVE | |
| Violations: 0 | |
| Latitude: 40.625344 | |
| Longitude: -79.362335 |
| PERIOD | GAS QUANTITY | GAS PRODUCTION DAYS | CONDENSATE QUANTITY | CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS | OIL QUANTITY | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2010-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2011-0 | 4332.0 | 334.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2012-0 | 3504.0 | 366.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2013-0 | 2254.0 | 365.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2014-0 | 1473.0 | 365.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
For data sources see[1]
| PERIOD | TYPE | QUANTITY | UNITS | DISPOSAL METHOD | WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID | WASTE FACILITY NAME | FACILITY CITY | FACILITY STATE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-0 | DRILLING FLUID WASTE | 1.0 | Bbl | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | PA0091472 | TUNNELTON LIQUIDS TREATMENT FACILITY | SALTSBURG | PA |
| 2011-0 | PRODUCED FLUID | 15.0 | Bbl | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | PA0095443 | CREEKSIDE TREATMENT FACILITY | CREEKSIDE | PA |
| 2012-0 | PRODUCED FLUID | 50.0 | Bbl | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | PA0101508 | FLUID RECOVERY SERVICE FRANKLIN FACILITY | FRANKLIN | PA |
| 2014-0 | PRODUCED FLUID | 25.0 | Bbl | CENT WASTE TRT FAC NPDES DISCHARGE | PA0095443 | CREEKSIDE TREATMENT FACILITY | CREEKSIDE | PA |
For data sources see[2]
| INSPECTION ID | DATE | DESCRIPTION | COMMENT | VIOLATION ID | VIOLATION CODE | VIOLATION_COMMENT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1847093 | 2009-11-16 | No Violations Noted | Site inspection and E&S plan review found issues with the utilization of encaspulation and below grade drill pits and the depth to the seasonal high groundwater table. A revised E&S plan was submitted addressing those issues through land farming and elevated drill pits, and additional contingency options should during site construction it be discovered that landfarming and or pits will not be able to be utilized, steel tanks will be utilized and the cuttings will be hauled to a landfill. The remainder of the E&S plan, as compiled, should effectively minimize accelerated erosion & sedimentation, provided the plan is implemented and maintained properly. | |||
| 1918551 | 2010-09-24 | No Violations Noted | Site had been constructed as outlined in the E&S plan. Silt fencing and haybales required replacement. Spoke with operator representative Robert Carnahan onsite and silt sox will be installed on 09/27/10. No accelerated erosion & sedimentation was observed in relation to the well-site or access road. Below grade pit onsite and it had more than the required two feet of lined freeboard. Operator should endeavor to reclaim the site and close the pit upon completion of drilling and any stimulation activities and implement BMP's as necessary to insure erosion & sedimentation is minimized through the fall and winter months. | |||
| 1918553 | 2010-10-07 | No Violations Noted | Drilling appeared to have been completed at the time of the inspection. Silt fencing has been replaced with silt sox for erosion control. No accelerated erosion & sedimentation was observed in relation to the access road or well-site. Below grade drill pit located onsite and it had more than the required two feet of lined freeboard. | |||
| 1920400 | 2010-09-24 | No Violations Noted | drilling - 798ft/E&S ok/ID&pit ok | |||
| 1961082 | 2011-03-25 | No Violations Noted | Drilling complete/. Well equipped for production.Site graded and mulched. No open pits. | |||
| 2125186 | 2012-12-21 | No Violations Noted | ell appeared to be equipped for production at the time of the inspection. Brine tank located onsite and it appeared to be in sound condition. Site had been properly restored and the vegetative cover met the 70% uniform coverage criteria. There was no observed accelerated erosion or sedimentation in relation to the site or access road. |
For data sources see[3]