If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
m |
m |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| County: [[Portage_County,_Ohio|Portage]] | | County: [[Portage_County,_Ohio|Portage]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Municipality: [[Kent | + | | Municipality: [[Kent,_Ohio|Kent]] |
|- | |- | ||
| Operator Name: [[PIN OAK ENERGY PARTNERS LLC]] | | Operator Name: [[PIN OAK ENERGY PARTNERS LLC]] |
Well ID: 34-133-23851 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":41.124072544,"lon":-81.37703536,"icon":""}]} |
Country: United States | |
State: Ohio | |
County: Portage | |
Municipality: Kent | |
Operator Name: PIN OAK ENERGY PARTNERS LLC | |
Well Pad ID: | |
Farm/Lease Name: BABLE | |
License Status: Producing | |
License Date: 1991-05-21 | |
Spud Date: 1991-08-28 | |
Spud Drilling Contractor: ADVENT DRLG | |
Final Drill Date: 1991-09-02 | |
Well Total Depth: 4319 ft | |
Configuration: Vertical | |
Latitude: 41.124072544 | |
Longitude: -81.37703536 |
For data sources see[1]
Well Status | Well Status Date | Comment |
---|---|---|
CO | 1991-05-21 | 2386 EXCALIBUR EXPLORATION INC GeoDate 5/21/91 |
Oil and Gas | 1991-05-21 | Issued Date 5/21/91 Expired Date 5/20/92 Acres 0040000 Tool Type RTAF Proposed Formation BE thru CL Proposed Depth 04319 Proposed Drill Depth 04319 |
Original Spud | 1991-08-27 | |
Completed | 1991-09-02 | |
Reached Total Depth | 1991-09-02 | |
Completion Report Received | 1991-09-04 | |
CO | 1992-04-14 | 3442 CUTTER EXPLORATION INC GeoDate 5/21/91 |
Construction Permit Expires | 1992-05-20 | |
Change of Owner | 2008-05-06 | Operator changed from 3442, CUTTER EXPLORATION INC to 169, SMAIL JAMES R INC |
Change of Owner | 2018-11-29 | Operator changed from 169, JAMES R SMAIL INC to 9722, PIN OAK ENERGY PARTNERS LLC |
Record Last Modified | 2018-11-29 |
For data sources see[2]
Perforation Date | Interval Top (ft) | Interval Base (ft) | Number of Shots |
---|---|---|---|
2006-09-11 | 4114 | 4176 | 55 |
For data sources see[3]
Stimulation Date | Chemical Agent | Chemical Agent Concentration (%) | Fracking Fluid Volume | Mass of Proppant Used (lb) | Fracking Company | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACID | 0 | 800 Gal | 0 | FE | ||
H2O | 0 | 100000 Gal | 40000 | FRAC W/100M GAL H20,400 SX SAN AND | ||
CO2 | 0 | 20 Tons | 0 |
For data sources see[4]
Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|
1991 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | 10350 | 474 | 90 |
1992 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | 41619 | 1144 | 365 |
1993 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | 23076 | 305 | 365 |
1994 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | 11555 | 488 | 365 |
1995 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | 7011 | 380 | 365 |
1996 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | 4366 | 234 | 365 |
1997 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | 3311 | 243 | 365 |
1998 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | 2768 | 119 | 365 |
1999 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | 2049 | 133 | 365 |
2000 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | 1144 | 204 | 365 |
2001 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | 1052 | 37 | 365 |
2002 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | 883 | 147 | 365 |
2003 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | 2389 | 108 | 365 |
2004 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | 1496 | 135 | 365 |
2005 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | 1931 | 67 | 365 |
2006 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | 934 | 68 | 365 |
2008 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | 144 | 28 | 150 |
2009 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | 939 | 69 | 150 |
2010 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | 1033 | 84 | 150 |
2011 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | 1057 | 95 | 365 |
2012 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | 886 | 95 | 366 |
2013 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | 1204 | 96 | 365 |
2014 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | 2018 | 77 | 365 |
2015 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | 1430 | 130 | 365 |
2016 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | 896 | 48 | 365 |
2017 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | 616 | 63 | 365 |
2018 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | 598 | 34 | 365 |
Period | Operator Name | Waste Type | Quantity (bbl) | Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|
1991 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | Brine | 756 | 90 |
1992 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | Brine | 1044 | 365 |
1993 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | Brine | 624 | 365 |
1994 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | Brine | 557 | 365 |
1995 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | Brine | 420 | 365 |
1996 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | Brine | 490 | 365 |
1997 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | Brine | 350 | 365 |
1998 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | Brine | 350 | 365 |
1999 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | Brine | 270 | 365 |
2000 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | Brine | 185 | 365 |
2001 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | Brine | 181 | 365 |
2002 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | Brine | 255 | 365 |
2003 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | Brine | 360 | 365 |
2004 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | Brine | 195 | 365 |
2005 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | Brine | 235 | 365 |
2006 | CUTTER EXPLORATION INC | Brine | 235 | 365 |
2008 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | Brine | 20 | 150 |
2009 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | Brine | 189 | 150 |
2010 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | Brine | 146 | 150 |
2011 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | Brine | 222 | 365 |
2012 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | Brine | 195 | 366 |
2013 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | Brine | 187 | 365 |
2014 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | Brine | 189 | 365 |
2015 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | Brine | 104 | 365 |
2016 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | Brine | 107 | 365 |
2017 | JAMES R SMAIL INC | Brine | 131 | 365 |
2018 | PIN OAK ENERGY PARTNERS LLC | Brine | 0 | 0 |
Inspection ID | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
0000010168 | Preliminary Restoration | No Violations | PASSED Y WITNESSED 6/1/92 INSPECTOR KEITH WHITE DATE 06/0119/92 DATA FROM OLD VAX INFO | |
0094826428 | 2018-04-10 | UrbanProduction Wells | No Violations | Status check inspection of this Clinton Sandstone well. My inspection found the wellhead fenced and locked, equipped with 2.375 tubing and rods, and operating with the aid of an electric powered pumping unit. This well produces to a diked, fenced, and locked tank battery to the east and contains one (1) 100 barrel tank, a 30 barrel poly tank, and a horizontal separator. The required ID is posted at the wellhead and at the tank battery. No violations. |
1382558910 | 2013-10-23 | UrbanProduction Wells | No Violations | I was on location at the request of Jeff Schonauer (JR Smail) to investigate possible contamination of a water well located by this oil and gas well. Jeff responded to the landowner the previous day (10-22-13) and his gas meter was triggered by running hot water in the shop restroom. His meter did not have the capability of distinguishing the source of the alarm and he contacted me asked if I could investigate. I met with Jeff and the landowner this morning to investigate. I calibrated the PHD6 gas meter prior to entering the premises. I spoke with the landowner and he indicated to me that the well water had a strong odor and was not sure if it was gas or oilfield substances and smelled like sulfur. He was not sure how long it has been like that and that he only notices it when he is not around the shop for awhile and returns. He said several customers have also noticed the smell. He took me into the restroom where he showed me the water softner, pressure tank, and sediment filter that were installed. The sediment filter appeared black and he told me he changes it once every week. There was an obvious sulfur odor around the equipment, but I did not detect any methane. I began running cold water in the sink and analyzing with the meter. I ran the water for several minutes and registered a reading of 0.05ppm on the CH4 (methane) gauge for several seconds and it returned to 0ppm. No LEL (lower explosive limit), H2S (hydrogen sulfide), or CO (carbon monoxide) was detected. I began testing the hot water and in about 30 seconds the CO levels were at 35ppm and triggered the alarm on the PHD6. The meter reading topped out at 63ppm of carbon monoxide and the LEL reached a reading of 2%. Methane was detected at a concentration of 0.10ppm and no H2S was detected during the hot water test. The hot water had an obvious sulfur smell during the test. I ran a low-level Quantab to test for chlorides and registered a 1.6 on the strip which equates to 43ppm of chlori |
For data sources see[9]