X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

34-137-20048

Well Details

Well ID: 34-137-20048
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: Putnam
Municipality: Perry Township
Operator Name: HISTORIC OWNER
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: W D MYERS ESTATE
License Status: Orphan Well - Ready
License Date: 1976-12-13
Spud Date: 1965-02-17
Spud Drilling Contractor:
Final Drill Date: 1965-03-11
Well Total Depth: 1395.00 ft
Configuration: Vertical
Latitude: 41.040000
Longitude: -84.300000

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
Original Spud 1965-02-17 NO RECORD OF WELL BEING PLUGGED ON THE PERMIT ISSUED 12/13/76. INSPECTION ON 9/8/93 INDICATED 8" OPEN CASING SWEDGED DOWN TO 2". NO FLUIDS OR GAS ODORS NOTED AT SURFACE. I&O CASE # 1989 05 065. ALSO, THE #2 WELL, P#20049, IS IN THE I&O PROGRAM, BUT IT WAS PLUGGED ON 1/5/77, AND IT DOES NOT SEEM TO BE LEAKING BUT THE CASING NEVER GOT CUT OFF BELOW PLOW DEPTH AND THE LANDOWER WOULD LIKE IT TO BE. SEE IF THIS COULD BE DONE WHEN THE #1 WELL GETS PLUGGED. DUPLICATE 12-31-79, GL=721.7
Completed 1965-03-11 NO RECORD OF WELL BEING PLUGGED ON THE PERMIT ISSUED 12/13/76. INSPECTION ON 9/8/93 INDICATED 8" OPEN CASING SWEDGED DOWN TO 2". NO FLUIDS OR GAS ODORS NOTED AT SURFACE. I&O CASE # 1989 05 065. ALSO, THE #2 WELL, P#20049, IS IN THE I&O PROGRAM, BUT IT WAS PLUGGED ON 1/5/77, AND IT DOES NOT SEEM TO BE LEAKING BUT THE CASING NEVER GOT CUT OFF BELOW PLOW DEPTH AND THE LANDOWER WOULD LIKE IT TO BE. SEE IF THIS COULD BE DONE WHEN THE #1 WELL GETS PLUGGED. DUPLICATE 12-31-79, GL=721.7
Reached Total Depth 1965-03-11 NO RECORD OF WELL BEING PLUGGED ON THE PERMIT ISSUED 12/13/76. INSPECTION ON 9/8/93 INDICATED 8" OPEN CASING SWEDGED DOWN TO 2". NO FLUIDS OR GAS ODORS NOTED AT SURFACE. I&O CASE # 1989 05 065. ALSO, THE #2 WELL, P#20049, IS IN THE I&O PROGRAM, BUT IT WAS PLUGGED ON 1/5/77, AND IT DOES NOT SEEM TO BE LEAKING BUT THE CASING NEVER GOT CUT OFF BELOW PLOW DEPTH AND THE LANDOWER WOULD LIKE IT TO BE. SEE IF THIS COULD BE DONE WHEN THE #1 WELL GETS PLUGGED. DUPLICATE 12-31-79, GL=721.7
Changed to Orphan Well Ready 1989-05-01 Changed Well To Orphan Ready
Correction to Well 2007-10-29 NO RECORD OF WELL BEING PLUGGED ON THE PERMIT ISSUED 12/13/76. INSPECTION ON 9/8/93 INDICATED 8" OPEN CASING SWEDGED DOWN TO 2". NO FLUIDS OR GAS ODORS NOTED AT SURFACE. I&O CASE # 1989 05 065. ALSO, THE #2 WELL, P#20049, IS IN THE I&O PROGRAM, BUT IT WAS PLUGGED ON 1/5/77, AND IT DOES NOT SEEM TO BE LEAKING BUT THE CASING NEVER GOT CUT OFF BELOW PLOW DEPTH AND THE LANDOWER WOULD LIKE IT TO BE. SEE IF THIS COULD BE DONE WHEN THE #1 WELL GETS PLUGGED.
Record Last Modified 2019-03-25 NO RECORD OF WELL BEING PLUGGED ON THE PERMIT ISSUED 12/13/76. INSPECTION ON 9/8/93 INDICATED 8" OPEN CASING SWEDGED DOWN TO 2". NO FLUIDS OR GAS ODORS NOTED AT SURFACE. I&O CASE # 1989 05 065. ALSO, THE #2 WELL, P#20049, IS IN THE I&O PROGRAM, BUT IT WAS PLUGGED ON 1/5/77, AND IT DOES NOT SEEM TO BE LEAKING BUT THE CASING NEVER GOT CUT OFF BELOW PLOW DEPTH AND THE LANDOWER WOULD LIKE IT TO BE. SEE IF THIS COULD BE DONE WHEN THE #1 WELL GETS PLUGGED. DUPLICATE 12-31-79, GL=721.7

For data sources see[2]

Stimulations Data

Stimulation Date Chemical Agent Chemical Agent Concentration (%) Fracking Fluid Volume Mass of Proppant Used (lb) Fracking Company Comments
NITR 0 60 Qts 0

For data sources see[3]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
1334677215 2012-03-09 Orphan No Violations At the time of my inspection there was no sign of a well at the plotted location. The well is orphaned and Case # is 1989-05-065. I was unable to contact the landowner to determine the current condition of well.
1382632691 2013-10-22 Field Inspected, Well Not Found No Violations An inspection revealed no above ground casing at the coordinates listed within RBDMS. The well was plotted on a property designated as agricultural field with no crops surrounding the immediate location. A section of the property south of the alleged location contained corn at time of the inspection.

For data sources see[4]

References