If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
Well ID: 34-167-23498 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":39.5154608355,"lon":-81.2586739781,"icon":""}]} |
County: | |
Municipality: | |
Operator Name: | |
Well Pad ID: | |
Farm/Lease Name: | |
First Permit Date: | |
Last Permit Date: | |
Spud Date: 1976-05-30 | |
Unconventional: | |
Horizontal: | |
Producing: No | |
Violations: 0 | |
Latitude: 39.5154608355 | |
Longitude: -81.2586739781 |
PERIOD | GAS QUANTITY | GAS PRODUCTION DAYS | CONDENSATE QUANTITY | CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS | OIL QUANTITY | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS |
---|
PERIOD | TYPE | QUANTITY | UNITS | DISPOSAL METHOD | WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID | WASTE FACILITY NAME | FACILITY CITY | FACILITY STATE |
---|
INSPECTION ID | DATE | DESCRIPTION | COMMENT | VIOLATION ID | VIOLATION CODE | VIOLATION_COMMENT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
179193956 | 2006-11-15 | Inspected the area with the producer. He did not know of a well here and we found no evidence of one. Beaver's - the old producer - "would have told him of well, even if not producing". No lack of trees but did find many 2" pipelines in the area going nowhere. Beavers were so bad about reporting information, they may have plugged it, but still would have told new producer, if not us. The other possibility is that 66144 is really 3498? |