X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

37-117-20621

Well Details

Well ID: 37-117-20621
Loading map...
County: Tioga
Municipality: Gaines Township
Operator Name: ULTRA RESOURCES INC
Well Pad ID: 149057
Farm/Lease Name: PIERSON 810 6H
First Permit Date: 2010-03-23
Last Permit Date: 2010-11-16
Spud Date: 2010-09-28
Unconventional: Yes
Horizontal: Yes
Well Status: ACTIVE
Violations: 3
Latitude: 41.689755
Longitude: -77.560883

Production Data

PERIOD GAS QUANTITY GAS PRODUCTION DAYS CONDENSATE QUANTITY CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS OIL QUANTITY OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
2010-3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2010-2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2010-2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2011-1 82427.0 69.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2011-2 204524.0 184.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2012-1 141305.0 182.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2012-2 131448.0 184.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2013-1 114753.0 181.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2013-2 106876.0 174.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2014-1 88525.0 145.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2014-2 104132.25 174.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2015-02 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2015-01 11495.57 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2015-03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

For data sources see[1]

Waste Data

PERIOD TYPE QUANTITY UNITS DISPOSAL METHOD WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID WASTE FACILITY NAME FACILITY CITY FACILITY STATE
2013-2 PRODUCED FLUID 249.8 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) WMGR123NC010 HYDRO RECOVERY LP ANTRIM FACILITY WELLSBORO PA
2013-2 PRODUCED FLUID 188.0 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) WMGR0123 HYDRO RECOVERY LP BLOSSBURG FACILITY BLOSSBURG PA
2014-1 PRODUCED FLUID 265.5 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) WMGR123NC010 HYDRO RECOVERY LP ANTRIM FACILITY WELLSBORO PA

For data sources see[2]

Inspection Data

INSPECTION ID DATE DESCRIPTION COMMENT VIOLATION ID VIOLATION CODE VIOLATION_COMMENT
1916292 2010-09-29 No Violations Noted
1965575 2011-04-12 Violation(s) Noted High sp con on pad surface puddles. 608858 SWMA301 - Failure to properly store, transport, process or dispose of a residual waste.
1965575 2011-04-12 Violation(s) Noted High sp con on pad surface puddles. 608859 402CSL - Failure to adopt pollution prevention measures required or prescribed by DEP by handling materials that create a danger of pollution.
1965575 2011-04-12 Violation(s) Noted High sp con on pad surface puddles. 608860 78.56(1) - Pit and tanks not constructed with sufficient capacity to contain pollutional substances.
2039718 2012-01-31 No Violations Noted
2054149 2012-03-21 No Violations Noted A routine inspection was conducted at the Pierson 810 pad on Mar. 21, 2012. Seven wells are drilled (1H, 2H, 3H, 4H, 5H, 6H, and 8H) and one additional well is permitted (7H). The Fox pad has not yet been constructed. The erosion control BMPs were inspected and wer found to be functioning and maintained. Several puddles around the pad were monitored with a conductivity probe. No elevated readings for specific conductivity were found outside containment. A reading of 3,200 ï¾µS was taken from inside the secondary containment for the production tanks. This material should be recovered and disposed of properly. Both cut and fill slopes were showing signs of sporadic vegetative growth. These areas need to be assessed to determine if re-seeding is warranted. No violations were cited during this inspection. - MRN
2081848 2012-07-09 No Violations Noted
2210699 2013-10-07 No Violations Noted On October 7, 2013 an inspection was conducted at the Pierson 810 pad in Gaines Township, Tioga County. The last inspection conducted on behalf of the operator was on 10/4/13. During this inspection the following was noted: The silt sock installed at this has degraded over time and is in need of maintenance or replacement prior to any additional earth disturbance activities. Several area of the site are in need of additional stabilization. No evidence of sediment transport off-site was observed during this inspection. Several puddles were screened and no exhibited elevated conductance. No violations were cited during this inspection.

For data sources see[3]

References