X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

37-115-21481

Well Details

Well ID: 37-115-21481
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Pennsylvania
County: Susquehanna
Municipality: Forest Lake Township
Operator Name: CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: BAKER WEST 5H
License Status:
Spud Date:
Permit Date: 10/2/2013
Unconventional Well: Y
Configuration: Horizontal Well
Latitude: 41.891939
Longitude: -76.004636

For data sources see[1][2][3]


Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Category Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
2544477 Primary Facility 2016-10-25 Site Restoration No Violations Noted The Department was on site to inspect the Baker well pad (ESX10-115-0029). The wells associated with the pad are as follows:

115-20471 115-20470 115-20469 115-20468 115-20467 115-20466 115-20465

The well pad was vegetated in excess of the 70% perennial vegetative standard, the grading was up to par and the temporary BMPs had been removed from the site.

The site was stable and well vegetated with no apparent erosional issues.

I recommend APPROVAL of this Notice Of Termination.

There were no violations.

If there are any issues please feel free to contact me.

2622462 Primary Facility 2017-08-04 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted I inspected the Baker West well pad on July 20, 2017. The access road leading in was in good condition, with no debris leaving the site onto the macadam road (Turnpike Road). The well pad itself was solid and stable as well, with no excessive mud or ponding. There was some ponding but it just rained heavily the previous day. The cut slope had vegetation where it was not rock. The fill slopes were stable and solid despite recent heavy rains. All vegetation on site was thick, lush and perennial. There were no erosional issues observed during the inspection.

There were no violations noted.

For data sources see[4]

References