X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

34-153-22347

Well Details

Well ID: 34-153-22347
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: Summit
Municipality: Green
Operator Name: PAW OIL AND GAS LTD
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: PAUL A WEBER
License Status: Producing
License Date: 1987-01-29
Spud Date: 1987-02-09
Spud Drilling Contractor: SHERMAN DRLG
Final Drill Date: 1987-02-15
Well Total Depth: 4535 ft
Configuration: Vertical
Latitude: 40.983110492
Longitude: -81.41954673

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
CO 1987-01-29 696 WEBER PAUL A GeoDate 1/29/87
Oil and Gas 1987-01-29 Issued Date 1/29/87 Expired Date 1/29/88 Acres 0040000 Tool Type RTA Proposed Formation CLINTON Proposed Depth 04535 Proposed Drill Depth 04535
Original Spud 1987-02-09
Completed 1987-02-15
Reached Total Depth 1987-02-15
Construction Permit Expires 1988-01-29
Completion Report Received 1988-03-10
CO 1995-05-23 5154 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD GeoDate 1/29/87
Record Last Modified 2017-02-15

For data sources see[2]

Perforation Treatments

Perforation Date Interval Top (ft) Interval Base (ft) Number of Shots
1997-06-29 4274 4344 0
2006-09-11 4298 4343 14

For data sources see[3]

Stimulations Data

Stimulation Date Chemical Agent Chemical Agent Concentration (%) Fracking Fluid Volume Mass of Proppant Used (lb) Fracking Company Comments
H2O 0 69000 Gal 30000 FRAC: H2O,SAND
ACID 15 250 Gal 0 TO 2300# AT 24 BBLS./MIN., ISIP 1300# AFTER CLEAN UP . SHUT IN 24 HRS. W/1300#

For data sources see[4]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Oil Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1992 WEBER PAUL A 2561 370 365
1993 WEBER PAUL A 2276 328 365
1994 WEBER PAUL A 1826 269 365
1995 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 1471 176 365
1997 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 390 300 365
1998 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 1365 325 365
2000 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 1573 308 365
2001 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 1448 306 365
2002 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 1436 178 365
2003 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 1380 201 365
2004 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 1026 201 365
2005 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 1101 243 365
2006 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 985 237 365
2008 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 1014 1026 350
2009 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 850 199 299
2010 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 977 196 333
2011 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 1050 97 320
2012 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 759 190 354
2014 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 817 192 264
2015 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 793 97 358
2016 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 695 174 365
2017 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 797 93 357
2018 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD 1684 83 361

For data sources see[5] [6]

Waste Data

Period Operator Name Waste Type Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1992 WEBER PAUL A Brine 456 365
1993 WEBER PAUL A Brine 318 365
1994 WEBER PAUL A Brine 320 365
1995 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 366 365
1997 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 480 365
1998 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 0 365
2000 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 0 365
2001 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 0 365
2002 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 0 365
2003 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 0 365
2004 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 0 365
2005 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 744 365
2006 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 634 365
2008 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 560 350
2009 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 412 299
2010 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 492 333
2011 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 493 320
2012 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 449 354
2014 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 318 264
2015 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 473 358
2016 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 397 365
2017 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 539 357
2018 PAW OIL AND GAS LTD Brine 387 361

For data sources see[7] [8]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
0341097122 2010-05-24 Production Wells No Violations The Uniontown office received a call from the surface owner (Robert Ray 330-244-6896) near the existing well and tank battery. The well is located in a relatively new housing allotment. The surface owners receive no royalty interest. He requested that the well be plugged and abandoned. MRM records however indicate that the well is in production and the site inspection indicated that there were no violations. The only issue is the condition of the poly tank used for brine storage. It has deteriorated to the point where it should be replaced. This information will be relayed to the well owner.

For data sources see[9]

References