X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

34-055-20047

Well Details

Well ID: 34-055-20047
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: Geauga
Municipality: Newbury Township
Operator Name: SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: WILLS I& R
License Status: Producing
License Date: 2006-09-12
Spud Date: 1972-08-14
Spud Drilling Contractor:
Final Drill Date: 1972-12-13
Well Total Depth: 4113 ft
Configuration: Vertical
Latitude: 41.445639137
Longitude: -81.26912063

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
CO 1972-07-12 4398 DRY HOLE NATL PETROLEUM GeoDate 7/12/72
Oil and Gas 1972-07-12 Issued Date Expired Date Acres 0000000 Tool Type Proposed Formation Proposed Depth 00000 Proposed Drill Depth 00000
Original Spud 1972-08-14
Completed 1972-12-13
Reached Total Depth 1972-12-13
CO 1993-11-15 4362 BUTLER KATHY GeoDate 7/12/72
Change of Owner 2000-10-16 Operator changed from 4362, BUTLER KATHY to 2026, SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC
Change of Owner 2008-07-01 Operator changed from 2026, SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC to 72, WOLFE R OIL & GAS
Change of Owner 2013-08-28 Operator changed from 72, WOLFE R OIL & GAS to 7276, SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC
Record Last Modified 2013-10-03

For data sources see[2]

Perforation Treatments

Perforation Date Interval Top (ft) Interval Base (ft) Number of Shots
2006-09-11 3939 4030 14

For data sources see[3]

Stimulations Data

Stimulation Date Chemical Agent Chemical Agent Concentration (%) Fracking Fluid Volume Mass of Proppant Used (lb) Fracking Company Comments
H2O 0 70000 Gal 39000

For data sources see[4]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Oil Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1985 DRY HOLE NATL PETROLEUM 2667 30 365
2000 SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC 250 0 90
2001 SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC 866 0 365
2002 SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC 1022 0 365
2003 SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC 1003 16 365
2004 SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC 739 0 365
2005 SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC 556 0 365
2006 SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC 462 0 365
2007 SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC 639 0 365
2008 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC 218 0 180
2009 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC 1009 0 180
2010 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC 1463 0 180
2011 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC 1014 0 180
2012 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC 1140 0 365
2013 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC 1256 87 365
2014 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC 151 0 365
2015 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC 405 0 365
2016 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC 1149 0 365
2017 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC 1147 0 365
2018 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC 996 0 365

For data sources see[5] [6]

Waste Data

Period Operator Name Waste Type Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1985 DRY HOLE NATL PETROLEUM Brine 0 365
2000 SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC Brine 0 90
2001 SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC Brine 0 365
2002 SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC Brine 38 365
2003 SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC Brine 78 365
2004 SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC Brine 30 365
2005 SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC Brine 23 365
2006 SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC Brine 13 365
2007 SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC Brine 101 365
2008 SUMMIT PETROLEUM INC Brine 41 168
2009 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC Brine 96 180
2010 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC Brine 0 180
2011 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC Brine 0 180
2012 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC Brine 20 365
2013 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC Brine 0 365
2014 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC Brine 0 365
2015 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC Brine 365
2016 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC Brine 365
2017 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC Brine 0 365
2018 SELECT ENERGY INVESTMENTS INC Brine 0 365

For data sources see[7] [8]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
0039714742 2017-10-30 UrbanProduction Wells No Violations I conducted a reinspection of this well site as a follow-up from the last inspection on 9/15/2017, and involving complaint #5701. The dike has been reworked and increased in capacity. The large stones were removed from the dike and rebuilt with soil. The property adjacent to the dike, was observed to not have been disturbed or impacted. The 100 BBL production tank had been repainted and new signage was installed at the tank battery location. No violations observed.
0544851245 2013-10-28 UrbanProduction Wells No Violations My inspection found the well to be equipped with a plunger lift unit. The tank battery consists of a 100 BBL production tank, a 25 BBL poly brine tank, and a mechanical separator. There is no identification on the location. The dike around the tank battery needs to be rebuilt. The lease road is in stable condition. I will contact the company about the issues.
1510054339 2017-03-20 UrbanProduction Wells No Violations During this inspection, the well was observed to be equipped with a plunger lift assembly and the valves on the wellhead were open. Production records for this well were up to date. The tank battery consisted of one 100 BBL production tank, one 25 BBL steel brine tank and a mechanical separator. Valves on the separator were open and the chart showed production. Tank valves were equipped with flat plugs. The dike around the tank battery needed to be rebuilt due to weathering. Signage at the tank battery was not legible and needs to be reinstalled. The lease access was stable. I contacted Richard Campola of Select Energy Investments (440) 759-3506 regarding the need for rebuilding the dike and reinstalling new signage at the well site.
1614216248 2017-09-15 UrbanProduction Wells No Violations I conducted this inspection regarding complaint 5701 from landowner Dean Eppley. Mr. Eppley stated that the dike had been reworked but was not large enough for containment and the work that was conducted had negatively impacted his property. At the time of this inspection, the tank battery dike had been reworked but was full of medium to large sized rocks. The area of land surrounding the dike, was observed to not have been disturbed or impacted. Signage was still needing to be replaced at the tank battery location. I contacted Richard Campola, owner of Select Energy Investments about reworking the dike to remove the stones to make the dike impermeable. I also discussed the dike size and that it would need to be larger in order to meet requirements for containment, and install new signage at the location. Mr. Campola indicated that he would be back out on site within the next two weeks to address the above issues.

For data sources see[9]

References