If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
| Well ID: 34-031-20413 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":40.336336967,"lon":-82.13986901,"icon":""}]} |
| Country: United States | |
| State: Ohio | |
| County: Coshocton | |
| Municipality: Newcastle Township | |
| Operator Name: SAMPLES JAMES F | |
| Well Pad ID: | |
| Farm/Lease Name: OGLE LW | |
| License Status: Producing | |
| License Date: | |
| Spud Date: 1952-05-01 | |
| Spud Drilling Contractor: | |
| Final Drill Date: 1952-06-10 | |
| Well Total Depth: 3395 ft | |
| Configuration: Vertical | |
| Latitude: <Latitude> | |
| Longitude: -82.13986901 |
For data sources see[1]
| Well Status | Well Status Date | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Original Spud | 1952-05-01 | |
| Completed | 1952-06-10 | |
| Reached Total Depth | 1952-06-10 | |
| Change of Owner | 2005-04-12 | Operator changed from 9999, UNKNOWN to 515, SAMPLES JAMES F |
| Record Last Modified | 2016-07-14 |
For data sources see[2]
| Perforation Date | Interval Top (ft) | Interval Base (ft) | Number of Shots |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-09-11 | 3350 | 3395 | 0 |
For data sources see[3]
| Stimulation Date | Chemical Agent | Chemical Agent Concentration (%) | Fracking Fluid Volume | Mass of Proppant Used (lb) | Fracking Company | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NITR | 0 | 120 Qts | 0 |
For data sources see[4]
| Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Production Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | SAMPLES JAMES F | 0 | 100 | 365 |
| 2006 | SAMPLES JAMES F | 0 | 110 | 365 |
| 2007 | SAMPLES JAMES F | 0 | 115 | 365 |
| 2008 | SAMPLES JAMES F | 0 | 90 | 365 |
| 2009 | SAMPLES JAMES F | 0 | 112 | 365 |
| 2010 | SAMPLES JAMES F | 0 | 100 | 365 |
| 2011 | SAMPLES JAMES F | 0 | 62 | 365 |
| 2012 | SAMPLES JAMES F | 0 | 76 | 366 |
| 2013 | SAMPLES JAMES F | 0 | 65 | 365 |
| 2014 | SAMPLES JAMES F | 0 | 56 | 365 |
| 2015 | SAMPLES JAMES F | 0 | 59 | 365 |
| 2016 | SAMPLES JAMES F | 0 | 58 | 365 |
| 2017 | SAMPLES JAMES F | 0 | 57 | 365 |
| Period | Operator Name | Waste Type | Quantity (bbl) | Production Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | SAMPLES JAMES F | Brine | 10 | 365 |
| 2006 | SAMPLES JAMES F | Brine | 5 | 365 |
| 2007 | SAMPLES JAMES F | Brine | 10 | 365 |
| 2008 | SAMPLES JAMES F | Brine | 10 | 365 |
| 2009 | SAMPLES JAMES F | Brine | 10 | 365 |
| 2010 | SAMPLES JAMES F | Brine | 0 | 365 |
| 2011 | SAMPLES JAMES F | Brine | 0 | 365 |
| 2012 | SAMPLES JAMES F | Brine | 10 | 366 |
| 2013 | SAMPLES JAMES F | Brine | 5 | 365 |
| 2014 | SAMPLES JAMES F | Brine | 5 | 365 |
| 2015 | SAMPLES JAMES F | Brine | 10 | 365 |
| 2016 | SAMPLES JAMES F | Brine | 5 | 365 |
| 2017 | SAMPLES JAMES F | Brine | 5 | 365 |
| Inspection ID | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1340765044 | 2017-09-06 | Production Wells | No Violations | On the day of my inspection I found that the well was equipped with an electric powered pumping unit. The motor, drive belts and electric box were intact. The flow lines were connected and the valves were open. There were no leaks around the wellhead and identification was posted on the pumping unit. The production equipment is shared with permits 0389, 0390 and 0434. It consisted of one 100 barrel steel tank and one 30 barrel steel tank. There was not a containment dike around the tanks. Correct, legible identification was posted on the tank, and I found no leaks or spills. |
For data sources see[9]