X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

37-115-20842

Well Details

Well ID: 37-115-20842
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Pennsylvania
County: Susquehanna
Municipality: New Milford Township
Operator Name: SWN PROD CO LLC
Well Pad ID: 149945
Farm/Lease Name: TONYA WEST 6H
License Status:
Spud Date:
Permit Date: 2012-01-18
Well Type: GAS
Unconventional Well: Y
Configuration: Horizontal Well
Conservation: No
Latitude: 41.907794
Longitude: -75.662581

For data sources see[1][2][3]

Well History

Date Event
2012-01-18 New Permit Application
2012-04-16 Performed Spud Operation
2013-01-29 Drilling Completion
2013-06-30 Perforation
2013-07-14 Performed Stimulation
2014-03-10 DEVIATED

For data sources see[4]

Fracking Activities

Fracking Jobs

Job Number Job Start Date Job End Date True Vertical Depth (ft) Total Water Volume (gal) Total Non-Water Volume (gal)
1 2013-07-14 2013-07-14 6,227 4,865,150 0

Fluid Composition Data

Job Number Trade Name Supplier Purpose Ingredient Name CAS Number Additive Percentage by Mass Job Percentage by Mass Mass Used (lb)
1
Sand (Proppant), DAP-901, DAP-925,
DWP-603, BioClear 2000, DWP-NE1, Hydrochloric Acid,
CWS Propping Agent, Scale Inhibitor, Acid Corrosion Inhibitor, Friction Reducer, Biocide, Non-Emulsifier, Clean Perforations, Goethite 1310-14-1 0.1 0.0041 1694.99
Sodium chloride 7647-14-5 1 0 1.73
Olefin Proprietary 5 0 8.66
Fatty acids Proprietary 30 0.0001 51.96
Polyethylene Glycol Mixture 25322-68-3 70 0.0063 2643.95
Illite 12173-60-3 1 0.0039 1639.48
Diallyldimethylammonium chloride 7398-69-8 5 0.0016 651.52
2,2-Dibromo-3-Nitrilopropionamide 10222-01-2 40 0.0063 2643.95
Acetic acid 64-19-7 1 0.0001 59.92
Oxyalkylated polyamine Proprietary 5 0.0007 299.62
Calcite 471-34-1 1 0.0183 7614.45
Modified thiourea polymer 68527-49-1 30 0.0001 51.96
Propargyl Alcohol 107-19-7 10 0 17.32
Hydrochloric acid 7647-01-0 37 0.3733 155640
Organic phosphonate 2 Proprietary 10 0.0014 599.23
Polyoxyalkylenes Proprietary 30 0.0001 51.96
Methanol 67-56-1 60 0.0092 3856.18
Poly(Acrylamide and Adam methyl Chloride) 69418-26-4 40 0.0195 8141.91
Poly(oxyethylene)nonylphenol ether 9016-45-9 5 0.0028 1163.13
Crystalline silica (Quartz) 14808-60-7 100 10.1174 4,218,370.0
Biotite 1302-27-8 0.1 0.0023 969.81
Ilmenite 98072-94-7 0.1 0.0015 607.21
Paraffinic hydrocarbon solvent 64742-47-8 30 0.0148 6164.59
Amine salt Proprietary 5 0.0007 299.62
Formaldehyde 50-00-0 0.1 0 9.76
Organic phosphonate 1 Proprietary 30 0.0043 1797.7
Apatite 64476-38-6 0.1 0.0023 969.81
Ammonium chloride 12125-02-9 10 0.0017 708.48
Dimethylcocoamine, bis(chloroethyl)
ether, diquaternary ammonium salt
68607-28-3 40 0.0125 5212.17
Isopropanol 67-63-0 40 0.0125 5212.17
Water, Customer & CWS Base Fluid & Mix Water, Water 7732-18-5 100 89.3791 37,266,000.0

For data sources see[5]

Stimulation Data

Stimulation Date Phase Number Chemical Agent Volume (gal) Treating Pressure (psi) Breakdown Pressure (psi)
2013-07-14 0 0 0

For data sources see[6]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Gas Production Days Oil Quantity (bbl) Oil Production Days Water Quantity (bbl) Water Production Days
2012 SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
2013 SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO 676,998.00 145 0.00 0 0.00 0
2014 SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO 1,409,099.00 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
2015 SWN PROD CO LLC 725,137.00 312 0.00 0 0.00 0
2016 SWN PROD CO LLC 639,011.00 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
2017 SWN PROD CO LLC 425,178.00 364 0.00 0 0.00 0
2018 SWN PROD CO LLC 327,705.00 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
2019 SWN PROD CO LLC 335,711.00 365 0.00 0 0.00 0

For data sources see[7]

Waste Data

Period Operator Waste Type Quantity Disposal Method Waste Facility ID
2012 SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO Drilling Fluid Waste 24.00 Bbl CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE WMGR119
2012 SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO Drill Cuttings 3,679.56 Tons LANDFILL 101247
2012 SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO Drill Cuttings 812.18 Tons LANDFILL THR029
2013 SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO Produced Fluid 3,161.00 Bbl REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING
2013 SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO Drill Cuttings 337.86 Tons LANDFILL 101247
2013 SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO Fracing Fluid Waste 5,432.00 Bbl REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING
2014 SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO Produced Fluid 1,578.00 Bbl REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING
2015 SWN PROD CO LLC Produced Fluid 23,045.00 Bbl REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING
2016 SWN PROD CO LLC Produced Fluid 1,306.05 Bbl REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING
2017 SWN PROD CO LLC Other Oil & Gas Wastes 10.00 Bbl SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 95-16-65420-013
2017 SWN PROD CO LLC Produced Fluid 1,376.40 Bbl SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 95-16-65420-013
2018 SWN PROD CO LLC Produced Fluid 294.80 Bbl REUSE (AT WELL PAD)
2018 SWN PROD CO LLC Produced Fluid 1,627.40 Bbl SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 95-16-65420-013
2018 SWN PROD CO LLC Produced Fluid 503.40 Bbl SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 826342
2018 SWN PROD CO LLC Other Oil & Gas Wastes 109.52 Bbl SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 95-16-65420-013
2019 SWN PROD CO LLC Produced Fluid 65.00 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NC035
2019 SWN PROD CO LLC Produced Fluid 891.60 Bbl SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 95-16-65420-013
2019 SWN PROD CO LLC Produced Fluid 309.20 Bbl SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 826342
2019 SWN PROD CO LLC Other Oil & Gas Wastes 31.23 Bbl SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 95-16-65420-013

For data sources see[8]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Category Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
2066877 Primary Facility 2012-05-08 Drilling/Alteration No Violations Noted Falcon Rig 23. Hit excessive water on top hole. Did two (2) cement jobs. Currently waiting on cement since 4:30 am. WOC 12 hrs. Planning to reuse water. Drilling on ly 1 well at this time on this pad. Walked site with Co. man. Secondary containment in place and in good condition Checked cellar - No violations observed.
2135250 Primary Facility 2013-01-31 Drilling/Alteration No Violations Noted Rig DDI-10 on site. Currently moving to Koziol pad. Have completed this well to TD (10392'). Only well drilled on pad at this time. Did not walk site due to rig move activites going on. No violations observed.
2244809 Primary Facility 2013-12-02 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted Well in production. 1 treater/1tank. Cellar filled with gravel.
2345880 Primary Facility 2015-02-11 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted Falcon Drilling Rig #25 was in the process of moving to the location during the inspection. We met with Rudy Holtzclaw, company man of SWN Energy. Mr. Holtzclaw stated that drilling will most likely commence tomorrow, 2/12/15. The 2H-5H wells have been spudded and will be drilled to kickoff point with Falcon Rig #25. The surface and intermediate casing of these wells will be cemented. Most likely a Precision Drilling Rig will mobilize to the site at a date to be determined to re-enter the wells to drill from kickoff point to total depth. The 6H well is in the production phase of operations. There are (2) heating units staged on the pad surface near the production fluid tank containment. Mr. Holtzclaw claimed the tanks did not contain any diesel fuel and the tanks will be placed on containment upon filling with fuel.
2374375 Primary Facility 2015-05-29 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted
2404915 Primary Facility 2015-09-03 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted
2417556 Primary Facility 2015-10-21 Complaint Inspection No Violations Noted
2418237 Primary Facility 2015-10-20 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted On-site, Mr. Klemish and I met with Dave Singer, SWN Completions Foreman overseeing Halliburton’s hydraulic fracturing operations. Hallibuton is in the process of fracking 4 wells, the 2H, 3H, 4H, and 5H. The inspection revealed that the “dust” in question was actually frac sand that was becoming air borne as it was off loaded to proppant storage tanks. The Halliburton team working this part of the operation stated that they were having issues with their filtration system and that they had additional components in route and that they were actively trying to fine tune the operation. The airborne frac sand appeared to be coming from multiple locations of this operation. The “dust” on-site became irritating to me near the off-loading area which caused me to move back to the completion foreman’s trailer. At that time, I stated that fugitive emissions off-site of an operation were a violation of the Department’s Air Resources regulations.
2422914 Primary Facility 2015-10-26 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted Inspection conducted on 10/26/15 of the Tonya West Pad as a follow-up inspection to an ongoing dust complaint related to the sand off loading at the site as part of the hydraulic fracturing activities. Present during the inspection was Joe Gaboff, Department OGI. The dust issues that are related to the off-loading of the frac sand were not observed during the inspection. Joe Gaboff believes that the sand capture system must not be working efficiently as evidenced by the amount of filled tote bags present near the off-loading site. It appears as if the filtration system must be very labor intensive, again as evidenced by the high volume of frac sand being collected. There are no longer any hatches left open. The Department will continue to conduct intensive investigations to ensure that the short cuts observed during the initial investigation of this site do not resume.
2422950 Primary Facility 2015-11-05 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted Inspection conducted on 11/5/15 of the Tonya West Pad as a follow-up inspection to an ongoing dust complaint related to the sand off loading at the site as part of the hydraulic fracturing activities. The hydraulic fracturing activities have been completed. The frac sand off-loading dust suppression system has been removed. The containment is still in place. A high volume of waste sand is still present on the containment. Coil tubing activities taking place during the inspection. No violations noted. Please remove the waste sand that is present in order to avoid natural causes, i.e. wind from mobilizing the sand.
2425082 Primary Facility 2015-11-16 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted During the inspection, Ryan Klemish, SWN Regulatory Analyst and Dan Jones, Acting Regulatory Analyst arrived on-site. Mr. Klemish also metered this location with a pen meter and recorded a reading of 3 milliSiemens/cm³. The Department was able to collect a small sample of this water and is having it analyzed for the metal analytes of the Department’s 946 suite. The second puddle in question had an elevated reading of 6 milliSiemens/cm³. This puddle is located right off containment in front of the well heads on the entrance side. The Department spoke to Mike Deming, Senior Regulatory Analyst by phone about the puddles in question. Mr. Deming agreed to have a consultant evaluate both locations.
2426685 Primary Facility 2015-11-19 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted Mr. Deming stated he would work on getting the pump system up and running ASAP. As always, please be prepared to provide the Department with a detailed report of your field screenings as had been conducted on the hot spot near the well heads. Mr. Deming stated that there is a possibility that dust suppression activities conducted in response to a dust complaint on the access road may be contributing to the elevated conductivity readings. He is going to attempt to contact the contractor and get a sample of the pure product that was used on the access road.
2432490 Primary Facility 2015-12-14 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted A review of the Department collected sample results as illustrated in the attached Table 1, reveal that a spill has occurred at the well site, and it is recommended that SWN should conduct characterization and remediation of the site.
2434958 Primary Facility 2015-12-18 Follow-up Inspection No Violations Noted Standing water in the GPU containment was measured at 4 milliSiemen/cm³. The containment is new and appears to be sound. While the Department was on-site and preparing to leave, a well tender arrived on-site and began sampling from the sand trap observation valve. The tender went to each valve, opened the valve and filled a clear quart jar. After observing the contents, the tender dumped the contents of the jar on the ground of the GPU containment (photograph 1). This is probably the reason for the elevated conductivity observed. This does not appear to be a good practice, especially when not all well pads have new containment, if any, as had been pointed out on the Charles Pad, where no containment exists(photograph 2).
2448175 Primary Facility 2016-02-09 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted
2462312 Primary Facility 2016-03-04 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted
2471406 Primary Facility 2016-04-05 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted
2493586 Primary Facility 2016-06-13 Routine/Partial Inspection No Violations Noted The Department was on site at the Tony West (#12 Pad) to conduct a Routine Partial Inspection. At the time of the inspection, the E&S Inspection Log indicated that Klemish conducted an inspection on 6/13 and that there was no attention needed at that time. The E&S Plan map had several redlines. It was noted that the filter sock had been removed and that there were several additional topsoil stockpiles added to the site due to an excessive amount of topsoil present. The well site appeared to meet temporary stabilization requirements during the Department’s inspection.

The Department noticed that there was rust colored staining running down the production tank. The dried fluid appeared to have originated from the thief hatch on the tank. The Department requests that the operator investigate this and report back to the Department with your findings within 3 days of receipt of this report.

2493597 Primary Facility 2016-06-16 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted
2540379 Primary Facility 2016-12-01 Site Restoration No Violations Noted The Department conducted a Restoration Inspection in response to the submittal of a Notice of Termination (NOT). The Department noted that the PCSM BMP did not appear to be reflective of your Site Restoration Plan. The Department spoke with Justin Thomas (SWN) concerning this and suggested that you make any repairs needed and to please contact the Department, when they have been completed, to conduct a Follow-Up Inspection. The result of the NOT is pending the Follow-Up Inspection.
2557654 Primary Facility 2017-01-03 Administrative/File Review No Violations Noted I recommend that this NOT be returned.
2565989 Primary Facility 2017-02-28 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted At time of inspection, arrived on site at 13:30p.m.

The cellar was full of gravel with water setting on top with no bubbling noticed. The (9x5) annulus vent pipe was open and set up with a Taylor plug to check for pressure with a Crystal pressure gauge, the valve going to the production tank was closed. There was 465psi on the production casing and 394psi on the production line. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. I left the site at 14:20p.m.

2661227 Primary Facility 2017-11-15 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted At time of inspection.

The well was in production. The cellar was full of gravel and there was no gas detected at the perimeter of the cellar. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted.

2762164 Primary Facility 2018-08-09 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted At time of inspection.

The well was in production. The cellar was full of gravel with water on top and there was no bubbling noticed. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted.

For data sources see[9]

References