If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
| Well ID: 37-005-23096 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":40.798764,"lon":-79.25904,"icon":""}]} |
| Country: United States | |
| State: Pennsylvania | |
| County: Armstrong | |
| Municipality: Cowanshannock Township | |
| Operator Name: GREYLOCK CONVENTIONAL LLC | |
| Well Pad ID: | |
| Farm/Lease Name: LOIS COWEN DONHISER 1 | |
| License Status: ACTIVE | |
| Spud Date: | |
| Permit Date: 1984-09-11 | |
| Well Type: GAS | |
| Unconventional Well: N | |
| Configuration: Vertical Well | |
| Conservation: No | |
| Latitude: 40.798764 | |
| Longitude: -79.259040 |
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 1984-09-11 | New Permit Application |
| 1984-10-12 | Performed Spud Operation |
| 1984-11-05 | Drilling Completion |
| 1985-04-30 | NEWLY DRILLED |
For data sources see[4]
| Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Gas Production Days | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Oil Production Days | Water Quantity (bbl) | Water Production Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 3679.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 1996 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 2356 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 1997 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1711 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 1998 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 2204 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 1999 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1908 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2000 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1722 | 366 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2001 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1837 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2002 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1729 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2003 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1485 | 348 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2004 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1445 | 366 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2005 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1540 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2006 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1316.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2007 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1456.00 | 357 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2008 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1272.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2009 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1269.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2010 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1,330.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2011 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1,163.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2012 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1,011.00 | 366 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2013 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 920.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2014 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 887.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2015 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 838.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2016 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 839.00 | 366 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2017 | GREYLOCK CONVENTIONAL LLC | 771.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2018 | GREYLOCK CONVENTIONAL LLC | 1,010.00 | 350 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2019 | GREYLOCK CONVENTIONAL LLC | 1,194.00 | 350 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
For data sources see[5]
| Period | Operator | Waste Type | Quantity | Disposal Method | Waste Facility ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Brine | 15.00 Bbl |
For data sources see[6]
| Inspection ID | Inspection Category | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2603980 | Primary Facility | 2017-06-14 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | Well appeared to be equipped for production. There was no observed accelerated erosion in relation to the site or access road. |
For data sources see[7]