X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

Difference between revisions of "34-059-24336"

m
m
Line 11: Line 11:
 
| County: [[Guernsey_County,_Ohio|Guernsey]]
 
| County: [[Guernsey_County,_Ohio|Guernsey]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Municipality: [[Richland Township,_Guernsey_County,_Ohio|Richland Township]]
+
| Municipality: [[Richland_Township,_Guernsey_County,_Ohio|Richland Township]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Operator Name: [[UTICA RESOURCE OPERATING LLC]]
 
| Operator Name: [[UTICA RESOURCE OPERATING LLC]]
Line 33: Line 33:
 
| Configuration: Horizontal
 
| Configuration: Horizontal
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Latitude: <Latitude>
+
| Latitude: 39.978216621
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Longitude: -81.42046299
 
| Longitude: -81.42046299
Line 269: Line 269:
 
| style="text-align: right;" | 608485
 
| style="text-align: right;" | 608485
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 3-hydroxy-4-[(4-sulfor-1-naphthalenyl) azo] -, trisodium salt
+
| 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid,
 +
3-hydroxy-4-[(4-sulfor-1-naphthalenyl)
 +
azo] -, trisodium salt
 
| 915-67-3
 
| 915-67-3
 
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
 
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
Line 275: Line 277:
 
| style="text-align: right;" | 2
 
| style="text-align: right;" | 2
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Reaction product of acetophenone, formaldehyde, thiourea and oleic acid in dimethyl formamide
+
| Reaction product of acetophenone,
 +
formaldehyde, thiourea and
 +
oleic acid in dimethyl formamide
 
| 68527-49-1
 
| 68527-49-1
 
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
 
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
Line 305: Line 309:
 
| style="text-align: right;" | 138
 
| style="text-align: right;" | 138
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 5-(acetylamino) -4-hydroxy-3-[(2-methoxyphenyl) azo] -, disodium salt
+
| 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid,
 +
5-(acetylamino) -4-hydroxy-3-[(2-methoxyphenyl)
 +
azo] -, disodium salt
 
| 6625-46-3
 
| 6625-46-3
 
| style="text-align: right;" | 0
 
| style="text-align: right;" | 0

Revision as of 00:24, 1 September 2019

Well Details

Well ID: 34-059-24336
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: Guernsey
Municipality: Richland Township
Operator Name: UTICA RESOURCE OPERATING LLC
Well Pad ID: US-OH-000877
Farm/Lease Name: DYNAMITE
License Status: Producing
License Date: 2014-02-24
Spud Date: 2014-03-22
Spud Drilling Contractor: H&P DRILLING
Final Drill Date: 2014-09-16
Well Total Depth: 12107 ft
Configuration: Horizontal
Latitude: 39.978216621
Longitude: -81.42046299

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
APP 2014-02-24 Proposed Formations:POINT PLEASANT, Issued Date:2/24/2014, Expired Date:2/24/2016 12:00:00 PM, Drilling unit acres:560.836, Proposed Well Type:OG, Proposed Well Class:POOL
Reached Total Depth 2014-09-16

-1/22/19 ALE.

Completion Report Received 2015-07-23

-1/22/19 ALE.

Construction Permit Expires 2016-02-24

-1/22/19 ALE.

Correction to Well 2016-10-21 CHANGE IN TARGET/TAKEPOINT/ACREAGE PER AS DRILLED PLAT RCVD 10/19/2016-ALE
Change of Owner 2018-05-04 Operator changed from 8595, PDC ENERGY INC to 10114, UTICA RESOURCE OPERATING LLC
Record Last Modified 2019-01-22

-1/22/19 ALE.

For data sources see[2]

Fracking Activities

Fracking Jobs

Job Number Job Start Date Job End Date True Vertical Depth (ft) Total Water Volume (gal) Total Non-Water Volume (gal)
1 10/17/2014 11/12/2014 7189 6,959,710.0 0

Fluid Composition Data

Job Number Trade Name Supplier Purpose Ingredient Name CAS Number Additive Percentage by Mass Job Percentage by Mass Mass Used (lb)
1 Fresh Water Operator Base Fluid Fresh Water 7732-18-5 100 90.6178 57,974,200.0
100 Mesh - COMMON WHITE Halliburton Proppant Crystalline silica, quartz 14808-60-7 100 0.850242 543956
HAI-OS ACID INHIBITOR Halliburton Corrosion Inhibitor Propargyl alcohol 107-19-7 10 0.00007181 46
Methanol 67-56-1 60 0.000430864 276
BE-9W Halliburton Biocide Tributyl tetradecyl phosphonium chloride 81741-28-8 10 0.00232405 1487
BE-9 Halliburton Biocide Tributyl tetradecyl phosphonium chloride 81741-28-8 10 0.00165342 1058
BA-40L BUFFERING AGENT Halliburton Buffer Potassium carbonate 584-08-7 60 0.000327195 210
FR-66 Halliburton Friction Reducer Hydrotreated light petroleum distillate 64742-47-8 30 0.0105956 6779
BC-140 Halliburton Crosslinker Ethylene glycol 107-21-1 30 0.0168604 10787
Monoethanolamine borate 26038-87-9 60 0.0337207 21574
30/50 - PREMIUM WHITE Halliburton Proppant Crystalline silica, quartz 14808-60-7 100 7.53998 4,823,820.0
SCALECHEK LP-55 SCALE INHIBITOR Halliburton Scale Inhibitor Polyacrylate Confidential 60 0.0149159 9543
Other Ingredient(s) Propylene glycol 57-55-6 0 0.0139443 8922
Olefins Confidential 0 0.00000718 5
Sorbitan, mono-9-octadecenoate, (Z) 1338-43-8 0 0.000353186 226
Food red 10 3734-67-6 0 0.00000249 2
Water 7732-18-5 0 0.951105 608485
2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid,

3-hydroxy-4-[(4-sulfor-1-naphthalenyl) azo] -, trisodium salt

915-67-3 0 0.00000249 2
Reaction product of acetophenone,

formaldehyde, thiourea and oleic acid in dimethyl formamide

68527-49-1 0 0.000215432 138
Sodium sulfate 7757-82-6 0 0.00124299 796
Sodium chloride 7647-14-5 0 0.00176593 1130
Olefins Confidential 0 0.00003591 23
Alcohols, C14-C15, ethoxylated 68951-67-7 0 0.000215432 138
2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid,

5-(acetylamino) -4-hydroxy-3-[(2-methoxyphenyl) azo] -, disodium salt

6625-46-3 0 0.00000249 2
Alcohols, C12-16, ethoxylated 68551-12-2 0 0.00176593 1130
Sorbitan monooleate polyoxyethylene derivative 9005-65-6 0 0.000353186 226
Fatty acids, tall oil Confidential 0 0.000215432 138
Polyacrylamide copolymer Confidential 0 0.0105956 6779
Fatty acid tall oil amide Confidential 0 0.00176593 1130
Ammonium chloride 12125-02-9 0 0.00176593 1130
LCA-1 Halliburton Solvent Paraffinic solvent Confidential 100 0.00329466 2108
HYDROCHLORIC ACID 5-10% Halliburton Solvent Hydrochloric acid 7647-01-0 10 0.0810294 51840
HYDROCHLORIC ACID 10-30% Halliburton Solvent Hydrochloric acid 7647-01-0 30 0.00628119 4019

For data sources see[3]

Stimulations Data

Stimulation Date Chemical Agent Chemical Agent Concentration (%) Fracking Fluid Volume Mass of Proppant Used (lb) Fracking Company Comments
2014-10-21 H2O 0 112859 Gal 104645 Halliburton 20 shots total

For data sources see[4]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Oil Quantity (bbl) Production Days
2014 PDC ENERGY INC 12374 3666 13
2015 PDC ENERGY INC 260203 70635 365
2016 PDC ENERGY INC 138079 26958 366
2017 PDC ENERGY INC 95797 16499 365
2018 UTICA RESOURCE OPERATING LLC 51181 5730 287
2019 UTICA RESOURCE OPERATING LLC 20729 2349 69

For data sources see[5] [6]

Waste Data

Period Operator Name Waste Type Quantity (bbl) Production Days
2014 PDC ENERGY INC Brine 2516 13
2015 PDC ENERGY INC Brine 12318 365
2016 PDC ENERGY INC Brine 5335 366
2017 PDC ENERGY INC Brine 4689 365
2018 UTICA RESOURCE OPERATING LLC Brine 1361 196
2019 UTICA RESOURCE OPERATING LLC Brine 50 69

For data sources see[7] [8]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
0006244788 2018-10-09 Production Wells No Violations During my inspection the pad was being prepared for the rig to arrive to drill the surface boreholes for 3405924532 and 3405924533. During my inspection the well was caged and still appeared to be in production. Rig components were being brought on location.
0014865322 2018-10-22 Production Wells No Violations The well had been decommissioned with tubing plugs while 2 new wells are being drilled on the pad.
0038855997 2019-01-11 Production Wells No Violations The inspection was conducted as a simultaneous operation inspection on a production well. The well is equipped with a large Texas Style gas plunger lift system with a steel cage built over the well. The production master valves are open, and the annular valves are open measuring pressure. The tubing pressure is 0 psi and the annulus are reading 0 psi.
0042217321 2018-11-08 Production Wells No Violations The purpose of my inspection was to conduct a status check on well #2-4336. At the time of my inspection the well was temporarily abandoned and caged while Patterson #343 was rigging up to drill two additional wells on the pad. Jersey barriers were placed outside of the cage to prevent a collision with the well head. Pressure gauges to monitor annular, production, and tubing pressure remained in place. The intermediate casing annular pressure gauge indicated 100 psi. The production casing annulus indicated 10 psi. The casing and tubing gauges both indicated 0 psi. All valves remained in the closed position. No leaks were observed. The flare stack was positioned in the Southwest corner of the pad and away from the well heads and surface equipment. The proposed and approved SIMOPS plan conditions were met at this time.
0067329125 2019-02-06 Production Wells No Violations The purpose of my inspection was a status check. The well was recently turned back on after being temporarily abandon in order for two addition wells to be drilled on pad. During my inspection the well was equipped with a plunger lift system with production valves in the open position. Annular pressure monitoring was present. The production equipment consisted of sixteen 500-barrel tanks, four gas production units, two gas compression skids, four vapor recovery towers, horizontal vent scrubber, and two combustors.
0293903673 2018-09-25 Production Wells No Violations Accompanied by ODNR Kenn Frye, during our inspection a berm was being constructed around the pad with the cuttings from the conductors. Conductors had been cemented for 3405924532 and 3405924533. The well was equipped with a plunger lift system with production valves in the open position. Annular pressure monitoring was present. The production equipment consisted of fifteen 500-barrel tanks, four gas production units, two gas compression skids, four vapor recovery towers, horizontal vent scrubber, and one combustor. Kevin Rothenbuhler was contacted about the cellars bubbling on the 3H and 4H. Mr. Rothenbuhler stated that they would remove the pea gravel from the cellars on all wells and tighten valves and fittings that are plumbed up for annular pressure monitoring to remediate the bubbling.
0401668881 2017-06-29 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I witnessed that the well was equipped with a plunger lift system with valves in the open position. Gauges present read 250 pounds per square inch on the tubing and 410 pounds per square inch on the casing. Production equipment included a sand trap, a GP Unit, a vapor recovery system and a total of 12-500 barrel tanks all within containment and shared with the 2H, 3H and 4H.
0617457057 2018-11-05 Production Wells No Violations During my inspection there was not a drilling rig on location. The well was temporarily abandoned and caged.
0678461106 2018-10-29 Production Wells No Violations During my inspection Cameron was on location in the process of installing valve removal plugs and back pressure valves on the 1H, 2H, and 3H.
0826793655 2018-10-11 Production Wells No Violations During my inspection Fountain Quail Rig 4 was on location preparing to drill two additional wells on pad. The well was still producing during inspection. I spoke with Dave Grey, the company man on location for Utica Resources and Mr. Grey stated that they plan to produce the well until the super triple rig comes on location to drill the curves and laterals on the other two wells 7H and 8H.
0868950181 2017-10-24 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I witnessed that the well was equipped with a plunger lift system with valves in the open position. Gauges present read 410 pounds per square inch on the tubing and 570 pounds per square inch on the casing. Production equipment included a sand trap, a GP Unit, a vapor recovery system and a total of 12-500 barrel tanks all within containment and shared with the 2H, 3H and 4H.
1000021737 2019-04-15 Production Wells No Violations The purpose of my inspection was a status check. During my inspection the well was equipped with a plunger lift system with production valves in the open position. Annular pressure monitoring was present. The production equipment consisted of sixteen 500-barrel tanks, four gas production units, two gas compression skids, four vapor recovery towers, horizontal vent scrubber, and two combustors. The well was caged while the 2 wells that were recently added to the pad undergo drill-out operations.
1195609424 2016-12-20 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I witnessed that the well was equipped with a plunger lift system with valves in the open position. Gauges present read 255 pounds per square inch on the tubing and 650 pounds per square inch on the casing. Production equipment included a sand trap, a GP Unit, a vapor recovery system and a total of 12-500 barrel tanks all within containment and shared with the 2H, 3H and 4H.
1265158625 2018-04-26 Production Wells No Violations The purpose of my inspection was a status check. During my inspection the well was equipped with a plunger lift system with production valves in the open position. Annular pressure monitoring was present. The production equipment consisted of fifteen 500 barrel tanks, four gas production units, two gas compression skid, four vapor recovery towers, horizontal vent scrubber, and one combustor. Identification was present and production records were current.
1362768952 2014-10-21 Completion Testing No Violations On the day of my inspection I witnessed that Halliburton Services was on site fracing stage 7 of 64 total stages. 104645lbs of propant was used at average treating rate of 30.7bpm and an average treating pressure of 7608psi.
1437048905 2015-07-16 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I witnessed that the well is online and equipped with a plunger lift system with valves in the open position. Gauges present read 900psi on the tubing and 1500psi on the casing. Production equipment included a sand trap, a GP Unit, a vapor recovery system and a total of 12-500bbl tanks all within containment and shared with the 2H, 3H and 4H.
1467999759 2016-07-08 Production Wells No Violations I received a call on 7/7/16 at 22:00 from PDC EHS Supervisor Tony Long stating that at 18:45 an Ergon truck had a 2bbl oil release on the pad and that Energy Services had been dispatched to clean-up the release. Energy Services had put contained release, applied absorbent pads and bio sorb to the affected area but due to light shut-down final remediation. Energy Services was dispatched again on 7/8/16 at 09:30 and removed stone, remediated with clean fill. Upon arrival at 12:00 remediation was just being completed and contaminated stone will be hauled to a solids landfill.
1536086397 2018-08-29 Production Wells No Violations The purpose of my inspection was a status check. The well was equipped with a production tree style wellhead with a plunger lift system. Production valves were in the open position. The cellar had been filled with pea gravel. Gauges were present for all casing strings, but the annulus gauges were not identified. The production equipment consisted of fifteen 500-barrel tanks, four gas production units, two gas compression skid, four vapor recovery towers, horizontal vent scrubber, and one combustor. Identification was present and production records were current. Utica Operating Resources has been notified to identify the gauges for annular pressure monitoring.
1556692291 2018-08-16 Production Wells No Violations The purpose of my inspection was a status check. During my inspection the well was equipped with a plunger lift system with production valves in the open position. Gauges were present on all casing strings. The production equipment consisted of fifteen 500-barrel tanks, four gas production units, two gas compression skid, four vapor recovery towers, horizontal vent scrubber, and one combustor. QES was on location with a nitrogen truck injecting nitrogen into the 4H well for Enhanced Recovery.
1593424517 2018-09-27 Production Wells No Violations Accompanied by ODNR Southeast Regional Supervisor Brent Bear, during our inspection rig mats were being place on the pad. The well was equipped with a plunger lift system with production valves in the open position. Annular pressure monitoring was present. The production equipment consisted of fifteen 500-barrel tanks, four gas production units, two gas compression skids, four vapor recovery towers, horizontal vent scrubber, and one combustor. Kevin Rothenbuhler contacted me and stated that the pea gravel was removed from the cellar, the valves for annular pressure monitoring were tightened, and while utilizing a gas sniffer no leaks were detected. The pea gravel was placed back in the cellars today and no bubbling was present.
1804821220 2014-09-15 Drill / Deepen / Reopen No Violations On the day of my inspection I witnessed that H&P Drilling Rig #385 had cemented their production string and was setting slips, preparing to rig down and begin move to the Cole pad. The site passed preliminary restoration according to ORC 1509.072A.
1873380787 2018-09-25 Production Wells No Violations The purpose of my inspection was to document the status of Utica Resource Operatings Dynamite Pad prior to SIMOPS activities. Guerney County Inspector Austin Gutridge was present during the inspection. At the time of inspection well #2-4336 remained in production. Correct identification was present. A total of four (4) production wells were on the pad. Well #2-4336 will be within the fall radius of the anticipated rig contracted to drill the two permitted wells on the West side of the pad. Approved temporary abandonment permit conditions will need to be completed on well #2-4336 prior to the commencement of drilling activities that include well #2-4336 within the fall radius of the derrick.
2028188604 2015-02-27 Preliminary Restoration No Violations On the day of my inspection I witnessed that the well is online and equipped with a production tree with valves in the open position. Production equipment included a sand trap, a GP Unit, a vapor recovery system and a total of 12-500bbl tanks all within containment and shared with the 2H, 3H and 4H. The site passed preliminary restoration according to ORC 1509.072A.

For data sources see[9]

References

  1. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Well, tblLocational, tblPlugWell, tblInspection, tblCivilTownships and tblPad Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2019-05-07. Retrieved 2019-05-21. 
  2. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Well and WellHistry Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2019-05-07. Retrieved 2019-05-21. 
  3. ↑ "FracFocus Fracking Chemicals Database". 2019-04-02. Retrieved 2019-06-19. 
  4. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - tblStimulation Table". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2019-05-07. Retrieved 2019-05-21. 
  5. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Oil and Gas Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2019-05-07. Retrieved 2019-05-21. 
  6. ↑ "Combined Production - Oil and Gas Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2019-05-07. Retrieved 2019-05-21. 
  7. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Brine Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2019-05-07. Retrieved 2019-05-21. 
  8. ↑ "Combined Production - Brine Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2019-05-07. Retrieved 2019-05-21. 
  9. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - tblInspection, tblInspFail and tblinspFlDesc Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2019-05-07. Retrieved 2019-05-21. 
Retrieved from "https://wellwiki-prod.cloud.arc.gwu.edu/index.php?title=34-059-24336&oldid=8849712"