X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

37-125-28245

Well Details

Well ID: 37-125-28245
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Pennsylvania
County: Washington
Municipality: Amwell Township
Operator Name: EQT PROD CO
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: COGAR 592948
License Status:
Spud Date:
Permit Date: 2017-05-19
Unconventional Well: Y
Configuration: Horizontal Well
Latitude: 40.006308
Longitude: -80.155408

For data sources see[1][2][3]


Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Category Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
2705062 Primary Facility 2018-03-07 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted Today I conducted a routine inspection at the Cogar well pad and the following was observed.

Proper signs were displayed identifying the site. EQT currently has a rig on site and is drilling 1 of 6 new wells. The well heads onsite are contained inside subsurface vaults covered with equipment for the drilling process and could not be visually inspected. The production tanks were in good condition no leaks , rust or defects observed. Secondary containment for the site was intact and maintained.

The site had some stabilization issues on the SW side of the access road. There was some slides forming inside and outside the LOD. I spoke with Brian Morris from EQT about the issue and we arranged a site inspection on 3/13/18 at 1:30pm to discuss the plan for stabilizing that area.

2709813 Primary Facility 2018-03-13 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted Today I conducted a routine inspection at the Cogar well pad and the following was observed.

Proper signs were displayed identifying the site. EQT currently has a rig on site and is drilling 1 of 6. The well heads onsite are contained inside subsurface vaults and covered with equipment for the drilling process and could not be visually inspected. The production tanks were in good condition no leaks , rust or defects observed. Secondary containment for the site was intact and maintained.

For data sources see[4]

References