X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

34-013-20657

Well Details

Well ID: 34-013-20657
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: Belmont
Municipality: Kirkwood Township
Operator Name: GULFPORT APPALACHIA LLC
Well Pad ID: US-OH-000530
Farm/Lease Name: SHUGERT
License Status: Producing
License Date: 2012-06-15
Spud Date: 2012-05-25
Spud Drilling Contractor: UNION DRLG
Final Drill Date: 2012-06-29
Well Total Depth: 14225.00 ft
Configuration: Vertical
Latitude: 40.040000
Longitude: -81.120000

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
APP 2012-02-16 Proposed Formations:UTICA, Issued Date:2/16/2012, Expired Date:2/15/2014 12:00:00 PM, Drilling unit acres:0, Proposed Well Type:ST, Proposed Well Class:STRT
APP 2012-05-24 Proposed Formations:TRENTON, Issued Date:5/24/2012, Expired Date:5/24/2014 12:00:00 PM, Drilling unit acres:0, Proposed Well Type:ST, Proposed Well Class:STRT
Plugged Back 2012-06-22
Reached Total Depth 2012-06-29
Construction Permit Expires 2014-05-24
Record Last Modified 2015-03-18

For data sources see[2]

Fracking Activities

Fracking Jobs

Job Number Job Start Date Job End Date True Vertical Depth (ft) Total Water Volume (gal) Total Non-Water Volume (gal)
1 07/16/2012 07/27/2012 8671.14 6,578,150.0 0

Fluid Composition Data

Job Number Trade Name Supplier Purpose Ingredient Name CAS Number Additive Percentage by Mass Job Percentage by Mass Mass Used (lb)
1 Slickwater, WF115, YF115ST, 7.5% acid Schlumberger Corrosion Inhibitor, Bactericide (Myacide GA25), Scale Inhibitor, AntiFoam Agent, Surfactant , Acid, Breaker, Crosslinker, Gelling Agent, Friction Reducer, Iron Control Agent, Propping Agent, Fluid Loss Additive Water (Including Mix Water Supplied by Client)* NA 0 85.8154 0
Dicoco dimethyl quaternary ammonium chloride 61789-77-3 0.00153 0.00022 0
Acrylamide, 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic

acid, sodium salt polymer

38193-60-1 0.06474 0.00918 0
Magnesium silicate hydrate (talc) 14807-96-6 0.00007000 0.00001000 0
Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane 556-67-2 0.00001000 0 0
Thiourea, polymer with formaldehyde and 1-phenylethanone 68527-49-1 0.00086 0.00012 0
Dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane 540-97-6 0.00001000 0 0
Alkenes, C>10 a- 64743-02-8 0.00018 0.00003000 0
Sodium tetraborate decahydrate 1303-96-4 0.01408 0.002 0
Urea 57-13-6 0.00426 0.0006 0
Siloxanes and Silicones, di-Me,

reaction products with silica

67762-90-7 0.00001000 0 0
Decamethyl cyclopentasiloxane 541-02-6 0.00001000 0 0
Ammonium sulfate 7783-20-2 0.06119 0.00868 0
Glutaraldehyde 111-30-8 0.04374 0.0062 0
Trisodium ortho phosphate 7601-54-9 0.00861 0.00122 0
Alcohols, C14-15, ethoxylated (7EO) 68951-67-7 0.0004 0.00006000 0
Diammonium peroxidisulphate 7727-54-0 0.01487 0.00211 0
Ethane-1,2-diol 107-21-1 0.00245 0.00035 0
Non-crystalline silica 7631-86-9 0.00151 0.00021 0
Fatty acids, tall-oil 61790-12-3 0.00105 0.00015 0
Polypropylene glycol 25322-69-4 0.00028 0.00004000 0
Polyethylene glycol monohexyl ether 31726-34-8 0.03494 0.00496 0
Methanol 67-56-1 0.00142 0.0002 0
Hydrogen chloride 7647-01-0 0.35241 0.04999 0
Dimethyl siloxanes and silicones 63148-62-9 0.00006000 0.00001000 0
Prop-2-yn-1-ol 107-19-7 0.00027 0.00004000 0
Potassium hydroxide 1310-58-3 0.00007000 0.00001000 0
Sodium erythorbate 6381-77-7 0.00253 0.00036 0
Crystalline silica 14808-60-7 98.9818 14.0402 0
1, 2, 3 - Propanetriol 56-81-5 0.02346 0.00333 0
Guar gum 9000-30-0 0.32816 0.04655 0
Sodium sulfate 7757-82-6 0.02645 0.00375 0
Polymer of 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic

acid sodium salt and methyl acrylate

136793-29-8 0.00694 0.00098 0
Tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate 64-02-8 0.00013 0.00002000 0
Vinylidene chloride/methylacrylate copolymer 25038-72-6 0.00127 0.00018 0
Propan-2-ol 67-63-0 0.00031 0.00004000 0
Sodium hydroxide 1310-73-2 0.00001000 0 0

For data sources see[3]

Waste Data

Period Operator Name Waste Type Quantity (bbl) Production Days
2012 GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION Brine 2343 5
2013 GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION Brine 23908 200
2014 GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION Brine 20123 339
2015 GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION Brine 2102 329
2016 GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION Brine 2979 360
2017 GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION Brine 1667 363
2018 GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION Brine 1323 363
2019 GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION Brine 251 90

For data sources see[4] [5]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
-1024873253 2013-1-2 0:00:0 PW No Violations 0.50
-1440531795 2015-1-21 0:00: PW No Violations 2.00
-1743522845 2019-1-10 0:00: PB No Violations 0.10
-1887447996 2017-8-10 0:00: PW No Violations 0.50
-1946402956 2013-3-6 0:00:0 PL No Violations 0.50
-369235296 2020-11-3 0:00: PW No Violations 0.30
-469161073 2013-1-24 0:00: PW No Violations 0.50
-494393143 2019-1-10 0:00: PW No Violations 0.20
0201537417 2012-11-21 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection Deepwell was running tubing. Company man Chad Cavelle present. No violations noted.
0369837083 2015-01-12 Production Wells No Violations On the date of inspection I met with Brad Burwell with Gulfport Energy and Jermey Kinney with Hull and Associates. I was on site to collect information from Brad Burwell who had reported a spill at the Shugert 1 pad beneath a scrubbing unit. Brad informed me that a pressure test was done on a buried 4 inch PVC line that was attached to a scrubbing unit. The line was pressure tested with water and failed to test. A leak was found at the connection of the 4 inch line to the scrubbing unit that was buried. According ot Brad the pressure testing was overseen by Royce Bagwell with Gulfport and was performed by ROC Oilfield Services. Brad was informed that approximately 2bbl of water was lost during the testing but it is unclear how much contaminant was released. Brad was informed by Royce Bagwell that the scrubbing unit and 2 separators adjacent to it were not currently in use. At the time of my inspection the excavation was approximately 10 feet by 12 feet wide and 2 feet in depth. On top was approximately 18 inches of limestone aggregate with silty clay underlying it. Jeremy was on site field screening samples using a MineRAE 3000 Photo Ionization Detector (PID). The PID was calibrated using Span gas once each morning. I was informed that the 4 inch line that leaked was primarily a gas carrying line when it was in use. The highest PID readings came from the porous gravel and the contamination appeared to travel in the direction that the 4 inch line had been previously buried. Gulfport will continue to excavate until they can no longer find elevated PID readings. According to Brad, the highest reading they had found as of today was 300ppm. After speaking with Rick Trippel with ODNR, I requested that they send a few samples to the lab to confirm the PID readings and determine if they had excavated to clean soil/gravel. I requested that they include one sample with an elevated reading to obtain a fingerprint of what was released as well as sidewall samples and at least o
0469161073 2013-01-24 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection company was working on the tank battery. No violations noted.
0494393143 2019-01-10 Production Wells No Violations On site inspection found the well equipped with a lower A and upper B section with 2 diameter riser pipes attached to both sections, both riser pipes have valves but only one has a gauge. The riser pipes are not identified as to which well head section they are associated. The well is producing through 3 primary master gate valves and one hydraulic valve present on the production tree with artificial lift technologies present. There is an emergency shut down control button at the well head along with at the production fluid storage area and at the well pad entry along with the gas processing units. The production facility consists of (6) steel construction tanks situated inside a polymer lined steel containment dike area. The well pad perimeter does not have a complete earthen berm surrounding it. The well pad surface and lease road is stone construction and in good repair. There is well identification on each of the (4) wells present on the pad along with at the well pad entry point. The tank battery has hazard warning labels.
0599988550 2012-06-29 Drill / Deepen / Reopen No Violations Stopped by drill rig for update they were at T.D.@14,225 cleaning well bore in preparation to run 5.5 casing .
1010657344 2014-01-09 Production Wells No Violations Responded to a call from Chris Anderson of ALL consulting. A line from the production equipment had failed causing .34 of a barrel of production fluid to spill on pad. Site was remediated. No evident environmental impact.
1024873253 2013-01-02 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection there was no activity on the site. Well is capable of production. No violations noted.
1348872964 2012-09-25 Completion Testing No Violations Inspection revealed that crew was rigging up flow back iron from wellhead to tanks they plan on flowing well back in the next couple of weeks.
1440531795 2015-01-21 Production Wells No Violations On the date of inspection I was on site to check the status of the condensate spill cleanup on the well pad. When I arrived only a water truck operator and his truck were on site sucking fluid from the excavation. I took several pictures which are accessible on the shared drive. I spoke with Brad Burwell later that day on the phone and he stated that the cleanup was complete, samples had been collected (flags in pictures), and that Gulfport was waiting for the laboratory analysis of samples before moving forward. Since my last inspection, the excavation had been extended to the north and northwest (in the opposite direction of the tanks). The entire excavation is approximately 100 feet in length, 10 to 20 feet in width and 1.5 to 4 feet in depth. The excavation extended to expose 4 buried lines.
1543140993 2018-05-15 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I witnessed that the well was equipped with 5.5 inch diameter production casing with a plunger lift system, all valves were open at the time of my inspection. Annular pressure monitoring was in place for the 9.625 inch diameter casing gauge read 0 pounds per square inch, the 13.375 inch diameter casing gauge read 0 pounds per square inch. Production equipment included a Sand Trap, Separator, Gas Processing unit and line heater. There are 6- 400 barrel purge tanks shared with 3401320706, 3401320689, 3401320688. Identification tags were present, and production was up to date.
1730062219 2014-10-23 Preliminary Restoration No Violations This site has proper erosion and sediment controls preliminary restoration on this site is complete.
1743522845 2019-01-10 Plug / Plug Back No Violations Inspection report to document the well was drilled as a strata graphical test and was plugged back then drilled horizontally and is in production as 3401320657-0100.
1853036947 2012-11-21 Completion Testing No Violations Deep well well services are running 2.875upset tubing in well. There are about 250 joints. String weight will be about 45,000psi. Rig will move snubbing unit and pumping unit in to break pressure disc and get well in line.
1887447996 2017-08-10 Production Wells No Violations This well is equipped with 5.5-inch diameter production casing. The well appears to be free flowing without any artificial lift technology present at this time. The well is piped to a gas processing unit and then to six 400 barrel production fluid holding tanks. Production records in RBDMS are current to 2017.
1946402956 2013-03-06 Preliminary Restoration No Violations On the day of my inspection site was satisfactory. Preliminary restoration cannot be completed because the well site is still being developed. No violations noted.
201537417 2012-11-21 0:00 PW No Violations 2.00
369837083 2015-1-12 0:00: PW No Violations 4.50
599988550 2012-6-29 0:00: DD No Violations

For data sources see[6]

References

  1. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Well, tblLocational, tblPlugWell, tblInspection, tblCivilTownships and tblPad Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  2. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Well and WellHistry Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  3. ↑ "FracFocus Fracking Chemicals Database". 2019-04-02. Retrieved 2019-06-19. 
  4. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Brine Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  5. ↑ "Combined Production - Brine Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  6. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - tblInspection, tblInspFail and tblinspFlDesc Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
Retrieved from "https://wellwiki-prod.cloud.arc.gwu.edu/index.php?title=34-013-20657&oldid=14268092"