If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
Well ID: 34-031-24744 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":40.43,"lon":-81.98,"icon":""}]} |
Country: United States | |
State: Ohio | |
County: Coshocton | |
Municipality: Clark Township | |
Operator Name: BAKERWELL INC | |
Well Pad ID: | |
Farm/Lease Name: SAMPLES LOUISE | |
License Status: Final Restoration | |
License Date: 2018-07-20 | |
Spud Date: 1982-02-14 | |
Spud Drilling Contractor: | |
Final Drill Date: 1982-02-19 | |
Well Total Depth: 3525.00 ft | |
Configuration: Vertical | |
Latitude: 40.430000 | |
Longitude: -81.980000 |
For data sources see[1]
Well Status | Well Status Date | Comment |
---|---|---|
CO | 1981-12-31 | 432 BAKERWELL INC GeoDate 12/31/81 |
Original Spud | 1982-02-14 | PD.NAT. & WTR. FDT=2ND GMM UPDATED PLUG SATUS PER PLUG REPORT UPDATE LOCATION PER DOGRM SURVEYOR 1/9/19 ALE. |
Completed | 1982-02-19 | PD.NAT. & WTR. FDT=2ND GMM UPDATED PLUG SATUS PER PLUG REPORT UPDATE LOCATION PER DOGRM SURVEYOR 1/9/19 ALE. |
Reached Total Depth | 1982-02-19 | PD.NAT. & WTR. FDT=2ND GMM UPDATED PLUG SATUS PER PLUG REPORT UPDATE LOCATION PER DOGRM SURVEYOR 1/9/19 ALE. |
APP | 2016-06-28 | Proposed Formations:CLINTON SANDSTONE, Issued Date:6/28/2016, Expired Date:6/28/2018 12:00:00 PM, Drilling unit acres:20, Proposed Well Type:OG, Proposed Well Class: |
APP | 2018-07-20 | Proposed Formations:CLINTON SANDSTONE, Issued Date:7/20/2018, Expired Date:7/19/2020 12:00:00 PM, Drilling unit acres:20, Proposed Well Type:OG, Proposed Well Class: |
Plugged/Abandoned | 2018-08-17 | PD.NAT. & WTR. FDT=2ND GMM UPDATED PLUG SATUS PER PLUG REPORT UPDATE LOCATION PER DOGRM SURVEYOR 1/9/19 ALE. |
Record Last Modified | 2019-01-09 | PD.NAT. & WTR. FDT=2ND GMM UPDATED PLUG SATUS PER PLUG REPORT UPDATE LOCATION PER DOGRM SURVEYOR 1/9/19 ALE. |
Construction Permit Expires | 2020-07-19 | PD.NAT. & WTR. FDT=2ND GMM UPDATED PLUG SATUS PER PLUG REPORT UPDATE LOCATION PER DOGRM SURVEYOR 1/9/19 ALE. |
For data sources see[2]
Stimulation Date | Chemical Agent | Chemical Agent Concentration (%) | Fracking Fluid Volume | Mass of Proppant Used (lb) | Fracking Company | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H2O | 0 | 1800 Bbl | 60000 |
For data sources see[3]
Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|
1984 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 1440.00 | 365 |
1985 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 1298.00 | 365 |
1986 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 884.00 | 320 |
1987 | BAKERWELL INC | 723.00 | 38.00 | 365 |
1988 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 421.00 | 365 |
1990 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 598.00 | 365 |
1992 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 513.00 | 365 |
1993 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 452.00 | 365 |
1994 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 436.00 | 365 |
1995 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 369.00 | 365 |
1996 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 442.00 | 365 |
1997 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 513.00 | 365 |
1998 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 372.00 | 365 |
1999 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 470.00 | 365 |
2000 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 373.00 | 0 |
2001 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 372.00 | 365 |
2002 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 359.00 | 365 |
2003 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 216.00 | 365 |
2004 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 0.00 | 365 |
2005 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 65.00 | 365 |
2006 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 213.00 | 365 |
2007 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 214.00 | 365 |
2008 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 200.00 | 365 |
2009 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 141.00 | 365 |
2010 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 143.00 | 365 |
2011 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 158.00 | 365 |
2012 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 75.00 | 366 |
2013 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 214.00 | 365 |
2014 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 71.00 | 365 |
2015 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 108.00 | 365 |
2016 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 0.00 | 365 |
2017 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 0.00 | 365 |
2018 | BAKERWELL INC | 0.00 | 0.00 | 365 |
Period | Operator Name | Waste Type | Quantity (bbl) | Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|
1984 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 0 | 365 |
1985 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 85 | 365 |
1986 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 90 | 320 |
1987 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 0 | 365 |
1988 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 150 | 365 |
1990 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 165 | 365 |
1992 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 180 | 365 |
1993 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 265 | 365 |
1994 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 180 | 365 |
1995 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 285 | 365 |
1996 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 414 | 365 |
1997 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 305 | 365 |
1998 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 292 | 365 |
1999 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 200 | 365 |
2000 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 255 | |
2001 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 185 | 365 |
2002 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 290 | 365 |
2003 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 410 | 365 |
2004 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 75 | 365 |
2005 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 625 | 365 |
2006 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 560 | 365 |
2007 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 510 | 365 |
2008 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 550 | 365 |
2009 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 580 | 365 |
2010 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 585 | 365 |
2011 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 390 | 365 |
2012 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 555 | 366 |
2013 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 695 | 365 |
2014 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 665 | 365 |
2015 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 2110 | 365 |
2016 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2017 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2018 | BAKERWELL INC | Brine | 216 | 365 |
Inspection ID | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
-1061860808 | 2018-8-20 0:00: | PB | No Violations | 0.20 |
-315054660 | 2018-8-13 0:00: | PB | No Violations | 1.00 |
0315054660 | 2018-08-13 | Plug / Plug Back | No Violations | On the day of my inspection I met Joe Zollars at the well site to discuss the upcoming plug job. Joe said that he would be moving in tomorrow to start prepping the site to plug the well. Joe said that the casing is on a packer, so we will set the bottom plug through tubing, then rip and pull the production string, then go back in with tubing to finish setting the cement plugs. |
1061860808 | 2018-08-20 | Plug / Plug Back | No Violations | On the day of my inspection I found that Bakerwell was rigging down and moving out. The pit was closed, and the well was capped and covered. I spoke with Joe Zollars on the phone and he said that they used 9-1/2 bags of sack cement to top the well off this morning before they cut the casing and put the plate on. |
1091008945 | 2019-10-4 0:00: | FR | No Violations | 0.50 |
1095094214 | 2004-09-13 | Production Wells | No Violations | Well in production . |
1534340168 | 2018-08-15 | Plug / Plug Back | No Violations | On the day of my inspection I found that Bakerwell was rigged up on the well and pulling tubing. The 1.5 inch diameter tubing was set on a packer and it was pulling slow. Bakerwell had the wellhead equipped with a rubber line leading to the pit to capture any fluid being swabbed out of the well as they pulled the tubing. The rig operator Joe Zollars said that they had Petroset scheduled to set bottom plug later in the day. When I returned to the site I found that Bakerwell had 3422 feet of the 1.5 inch tubing back in the well. Petroset pumped a bottom plug with 30 sacks of class A cement. |
1534430010 | 2018-08-16 | Plug / Plug Back | No Violations | On the day of my inspection I found that Bakerwell had all of the tubing back out of the well and they were running in with their ripping tools to part the 4.5 inch diameter casing. Joe Zollars found a telegraph at a depth of 2500 feet and he tried to rip the casing there. Joe lost his telegraph and came up one joint. He parted the casing at a depth of 2468 feet. Joe said that he would pull the 4.5 inch casing from the well and run the 1.5 inch tubing back in to be ready for the Big Lime plug tomorrow. There was no information on the formation top in the well records. Bakerwell and I both agreed on an estimated formation top of 2240 feet for the Big Lime, based on offset well records. Joe agreed to run the tubing in to a depth of 2440 feet, or as close as possible. |
1534522536 | 2018-08-17 | Plug / Plug Back | No Violations | On the day of my inspection I found that Bakerwell had 1.5 inch diameter tubing ran to a depth of 2449 feet for the Big Lime plug. Petroset established circulation and circulated all of the oil out of the hole. Then they pumped 200 foot cement plug. Bakerwell pulled the tubing up to 973 feet for the Berea plug. Petroset established circulation and pumped a 180 foot cement plug. Bakerwell pulled the tubing up to 570 feet for the plug at the base of the surface casing. Petroset established circulation and pumped a 200 foot cement plug. Bakerwell pulled the tubing up to 200 feet for the surface plug. Petroset established circulation and pumped until cement was circulated to surface. Bakerwell pulled the remaining tubing and broke the wellhead down. We found that the cement had fallen out of site. Petroset filled the well to surface two more times and the cement stayed within 5 feet of the surface. Joe said that he would keep the well open overnight and top it off with sack cement. All of the plugs set today were set with class A cement with 2% gel. I spot checked the weight of the Berea plug and found it to be at 14.7 pounds per gallon. |
1588862199 | 2020-5-7 0:00:0 | FR | No Violations | 0.80 |
2145845997 | 2019-05-06 | Final Restoration | No Violations | On the day of my inspection I found that the access road was still in place. There were some erosion ruts forming at the bottom of the road, but it was mostly in good shape. The well site was still very rough. There has been no grading or seeding done at the site or along the access road. There were still some materials and debris left at the site, and the pumping unit was still sitting at the access road entrance. The production tanks have been removed. I called Rex Baker and left a message to call me concerning the final restoration on this site. |
For data sources see[8]