X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

34-031-25521

Well Details

Well ID: 34-031-25521
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: Coshocton
Municipality: White Eyes Township
Operator Name: NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP.
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: HOTHEM/DUNLEVY
License Status: Final Restoration
License Date: 1995-05-23
Spud Date: 1995-11-13
Spud Drilling Contractor: MID ATLANTC DRLG
Final Drill Date: 1995-11-15
Well Total Depth: 4250.00 ft
Configuration: Vertical
Latitude: 40.300000
Longitude: -81.770000

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
Oil and Gas 1984-11-28 Issued Date 11/28/84 Expired Date 5/27/85 Acres 0371780 Tool Type RTA Proposed Formation CLINTON Proposed Depth 04250 Proposed Drill Depth 04250
CO 1985-01-26 98 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. GeoDate 11/28/84
CO 1995-05-23 98 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. GeoDate 5/23/95
Oil and Gas 1995-05-23 Issued Date 5/23/95 Expired Date 5/22/96 Acres 0371780 Tool Type NT Proposed Formation NEWBURG Proposed Depth 03650 Proposed Drill Depth 03650
Plugged Back 1995-05-27 ? CLASS=POOL, TOOL=AIR RT.
Original Spud 1995-11-13 ? CLASS=POOL, TOOL=AIR RT.
Completed 1995-11-15 ? CLASS=POOL, TOOL=AIR RT.
Reached Total Depth 1995-11-15 ? CLASS=POOL, TOOL=AIR RT.
Plugged/Abandoned 1995-11-21 ? CLASS=POOL, TOOL=AIR RT.
Completion Report Received 1995-12-26 ? CLASS=POOL, TOOL=AIR RT.
Construction Permit Expires 1996-05-22 ? CLASS=POOL, TOOL=AIR RT.
Record Last Modified 2017-02-15 ? CLASS=POOL, TOOL=AIR RT.

For data sources see[2]

Perforation Treatments

Perforation Date Interval Top (ft) Interval Base (ft) Number of Shots
1997-06-29 3650 3674 0
3650 3674 0
2006-09-11 4113 4157 13
4113 4157 13
3650 3674 0

For data sources see[3]

Stimulations Data

Stimulation Date Chemical Agent Chemical Agent Concentration (%) Fracking Fluid Volume Mass of Proppant Used (lb) Fracking Company Comments
H2O 0 1810 Bbl 50000
ACID 0 500 Gal 0 TREATED W/1500 GAL 15% HCL ACID

For data sources see[4]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Oil Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1985 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. 6710.00 1418.00 332
1986 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. 4080.00 389.00 365
1987 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2680.00 219.00 365
1988 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2980.00 206.00 365
1989 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2460.00 135.00 365
1990 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. 1720.00 199.00 365
1991 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. 1510.00 89.00 365
1992 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. 1450.00 127.00 365
1993 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. 1130.00 52.00 365
1994 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. 440.00 0.00 365
1995 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. 0.00 0.00 365
1996 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. 0.00 0.00 365
1997 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. 0.00 0.00 365
1998 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. 0.00 0.00 365

For data sources see[5] [6]

Waste Data

Period Operator Name Waste Type Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1985 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. Brine 209 332
1986 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. Brine 140 365
1987 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. Brine 73 365
1988 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. Brine 109 365
1989 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. Brine 66 365
1990 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. Brine 33 365
1991 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. Brine 0 365
1992 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. Brine 25 365
1993 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. Brine 0 365
1994 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. Brine 0 365
1995 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. Brine 0 365
1996 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. Brine 70 365
1997 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. Brine 0 365
1998 NGO DEVELOPMENT CORP. Brine 365

For data sources see[7] [8]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
-1737360300 2017-2-6 0:00:0 AM No Violations 0.50
-42537533 2003-7-9 0:00:0 FR No Violations
0042537533 2003-07-09 Final Restoration No Violations passed
0419889096 2017-02-03 Final Restoration No Violations On the day of my inspection I met with DOGRM surveyor Tom Smith to record the coordinates of the remaining production equipment. Tom also walked the area with a metal detector and found two different signals within 60 feet of the equipment. Tom recorded those coordinates as well. Mr. and Mrs. Cramer came out to the site with a packet of documents and photos that pertained to the well. They had photos of the well being drilled and they had copies of royalty payments. I told them what I had found with regards to permit 3342 not being drilled, and the fact that there were two Hothem/Dunlevy #2 wells. I called Gregg Mason with NGO and left a message to contact me about the equipment.
1061217493 2003-07-09 Preliminary Restoration No Violations Well plugged , final rest passed.
1487695463 2017-02-21 Final Restoration No Violations On the day of my inspection I met with Gregg Mason and Scott McEwen of NGO to look at the equipment found at the site. Gregg and Scott both confirmed that the visible equipment consisted of a 2 inch line that would have come from the separator to the 8 inch drip bottle. The 1 inch steel line was used to blow the drip back into a storage tank, and the plastic line was used for house gas. Gregg said that the reason the equipment was not removed when the well was plugged is that the house was still getting gas from the unit. They re-routed their sales line in 2004 and cut gas to the home. Gregg claimed that the equipment was technically the responsibility of the landowner. However, he did agree to remove it. He also said that they would cut, cap and bury the old load line by the lease road, and the 1 inch line on the other side of the stream. Gregg said that they would try to get in this week to start the work.
1487952344 2017-02-24 Final Restoration No Violations I received a phone call on 2/23/17 from NGO pumper Scott McEwen to notify me that they were at the site to remove the remaining equipment, and to cut and cap the remaining lines. On the day of my inspection I found that the house gas drip bottle and associated steel lines had been removed. The yellow plastic house gas line was still on place with the end capped. The disturbed area had been graded out, seeded and covered in straw. The 2 inch load line at the bottom of the hill had been cut off below grade and capped with a steel plug. The disturbed area had been graded out, seeded and covered in straw. The 1 inch steel gas line beside the dry creek bed had also been removed. There were disturbed areas on either side of the creek bed that had been graded out, seeded and covered in straw. Mr. and Mrs. Cramer met me at the site. They said that they were present throughout the remediation work. Mr. Cramer said that he had requested that they leave the plastic gas line in place. He also said that NGO had flushed the 2 inch load line with a water truck prior to cutting it. Finally, Mr. Cramer said that NGO had cut the 1 inch gas line in two places, flushed the oil residue out and pulled the line from under the creek bed. There were no remaining oil and gas production materials, and all of the disturbed areas had been graded, seeded, and covered in straw. This complaint is resolved.
1737360300 2017-02-06 Administrative Inspection No Violations I conducted an inspection of this site on 2/2/17 and found that there was a steel load line and valve at the bottom of the hill at the where a vehicle path started. I found an 8.625 inch drip bottle that extended 2 feet above ground. There were three nipples off of the drip. One connected to an open ball valve, through a regulator, then a closed ball valve and into yellow plastic 1 inch gas line that entered the ground. The second connected to a closed ball valve and into 1.5 inch steel line that entered that ground. The third connected to a check valve, an open ball valve and 2 inch steel flow line that entered the ground. There were no gauges on the drip. There were no other material or debris near the well site. I called Scott McEwan, pumper for NGO, to ask about the production equipment. He said that he knew the site that I was concerned with, and he would go out to look at the equipment. I received a call from Gregg Mason and I explained why I had been called out and what I had found. I told Gregg that we need to determine the status of the equipment and have it removed from the site.
419889096 2017-2-3 0:00:0 FR No Violations 3.00

For data sources see[9]

References