X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

34-031-26873

Well Details

Well ID: 34-031-26873
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: Coshocton
Municipality: Oxford Township
Operator Name: MFC DRILLING INC
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: CAPSTONE
License Status: Producing
License Date: 2002-11-22
Spud Date: 2002-11-24
Spud Drilling Contractor: MARIC DRILLING CO.
Final Drill Date: 2002-12-07
Well Total Depth: 6922.00 ft
Configuration: Vertical
Latitude: 40.240000
Longitude: -81.680000

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
APP 2002-11-22 Proposed Formations:CLINTON/ROSE RUN, Issued Date:11/22/2002, Expired Date:11/22/2003 6:00:00 AM, Drilling unit acres:80, Proposed Well Type:OG, Proposed Well Class:POOL
Original Spud 2002-11-24 RBDMS Rec
Completed 2002-12-07 RBDMS Rec
Reached Total Depth 2002-12-07 RBDMS Rec
Completion Report Received 2003-01-10 RBDMS Rec
Construction Permit Expires 2003-11-22 RBDMS Rec
End of Confidential Data 2003-12-07 RBDMS Rec
Record Last Modified 2017-02-15 RBDMS Rec

For data sources see[2]

Perforation Treatments

Perforation Date Interval Top (ft) Interval Base (ft) Number of Shots
2003-03-04 6692 6707 31
2003-03-04 6664 6470 3
6664 6470 3
6692 6707 31
6758 6762 13
6771 6777 19
6840 6846 0
6664 6470 3
2003-03-04 6758 6762 13
2003-03-04 6840 6846 0
2003-03-04 6771 6777 19

For data sources see[3]

Stimulations Data

Stimulation Date Chemical Agent Chemical Agent Concentration (%) Fracking Fluid Volume Mass of Proppant Used (lb) Fracking Company Comments
ACID 0 4180 Gal 0
ACID 0 2000 Gal 0 1ST STAGE TREATED & TESTED…NON-PRODUCTIVE

For data sources see[4]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Oil Quantity (bbl) Production Days
2002 MFC DRILLING INC 0.00 0.00 0
2003 MFC DRILLING INC 55327.00 867.00 365
2004 MFC DRILLING INC 21067.00 0.00 365
2005 MFC DRILLING INC 18123.00 1152.00 365
2006 MFC DRILLING INC 12604.00 862.00 365
2007 MFC DRILLING INC 13138.00 749.00 365
2008 MFC DRILLING INC 9274.00 937.00 365
2009 MFC DRILLING INC 8371.00 682.00 365
2010 MFC DRILLING INC 8365.00 820.00 365
2011 MFC DRILLING INC 6015.00 600.00 365
2012 MFC DRILLING INC 2488.00 279.00 366
2013 MFC DRILLING INC 249.00 104.00 365
2014 MFC DRILLING INC 1141.00 270.00 365
2015 MFC DRILLING INC 1137.00 259.00 365
2016 MFC DRILLING INC 913.00 294.00 365
2017 MFC DRILLING INC 1120.00 388.00 365
2018 MFC DRILLING INC 2226.00 455.00 365

For data sources see[5] [6]

Waste Data

Period Operator Name Waste Type Quantity (bbl) Production Days
2002 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 0
2003 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 180 365
2004 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 509 365
2005 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 1774 365
2006 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 1090 365
2007 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 1282 365
2008 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 1332 365
2009 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 664 365
2010 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 1593 365
2011 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 637 365
2012 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 108 366
2013 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 75 365
2014 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 361 365
2015 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 396 365
2016 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 468 365
2017 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 815 365
2018 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 1150 365

For data sources see[7] [8]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
-1101721999 2009-4-28 0:00: PW No Violations
-1180357887 2009-11-10 0:00 PW No Violations
-1183630103 2020-5-22 0:00: PW No Violations 4.00
-1198405963 2020-9-15 0:00: PW No Violations 1.00
-125388353 2020-6-18 0:00: PW No Violations 0.50
-1586874609 2020-5-27 0:00: PW No Violations 1.00
-1896743935 2007-10-26 0:00 PW No Violations
-1922500417 2004-1-14 0:00: PW No Violations
-710215385 2020-4-1 0:00:0 PW No Violations 2.00
-853271668 2016-5-23 0:00: PW No Violations 2.50
-873428994 2016-5-16 0:00: PW No Violations 1.00
-919430630 2020-3-27 0:00: PW No Violations 0.70
-988915 2016-5-11 0:00: PW No Violations 2.30
0000988915 2016-05-11 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the siphon dam was still in place at the stream head and the booms were still in place at the final collection pool. There was a film of residue on the surface at both points. The rest of the stream was running clear with no visible sheen or pockets of crude oil. The marshy area had been treated with Bio Sorb. I did not observe any sheen or crude oil in the water at the marshy area. The impacted soil was still staged inside of the dike. Coshocton Pipeline had brought in a load of new soil to reinforce the front wall of the dike. I did not observe any type of fluid leaching from the dike. I called Dwayne McElhany of Coshocton Pipeline to ask about the dike. He said the they were waiting for instruction from Jim Aslinides, owner of MFC Drilling, to move forward with the dike excavation. I suggested that Dwayne bring a water truck in to skim the last of the residue from the surface of the two pools in the stream, and then remove the siphon dam and all booms to allow the stream to flow naturally.
0296089098 2016-08-09 Production Wells No Violations Emergency Operations Regional Manager Trisha Cartmell requested that I follow up on the removal of the siphon dam and absorbent booms in the stream that was affected when the spill occurred at the tank battery. On the day of my inspection I found that the dam and booms were still in place. I called and left a message with Dwayne McElhaney of Coshocton Pipeline to request that they be removed.
0853271668 2016-05-23 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the production tanks were still in place, and nothing had been done to remediate any of the contaminated soil in the dike. I spoke with Josh Schiering who claimed that the attempt to remediate in place was unsuccessful and MFC was now going to excavate and haul the contaminated soil away. There was a small amount of fluid leaching from the front of the dike, but nothing had run down the hill or made it anywhere near the culverts. The siphon dam and absorbent booms were still in place in the stream. I found no residual oil contamination in the stream. Pumper Ray Dillon showed up while I was at the site. He confirmed the plans to haul the soil to a landfill, but he did not have a solid time frame.
0868439587 2016-05-02 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the impacted soil that had been excavated outside of the dike was still staged for removal inside of the dike. I found no signs that any oil was leaching through the dike walls. The grass and weeds in the marshy area at the stream head still needed some clean-up. The water was clear of any oil pockets or sheen. The siphon dam was still in place. There was a small amount of residue that had collected against the boom at the dam. All other booms and pads had been removed from the stream from the dam to the collection point approximately 1200 down stream. I found no oil pockets or visible sheen throughout the course of the stream. There was some sheen present and residue that had collected at the pool where the remaining boom was set up. I spoke with Nick Hahn of Coshocton Pipeline to suggest that they treat the remaining oil in the vegetation around the marshy area with an oil absorbent material such as BioSorb.
0873428994 2016-05-16 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that nothing had ben done to remediate the tank battery. I called Nate Hahn of Coshocton Pipeline, who said that he didnt know when they would be out to work on it. He also claimed that they have been authorized to flush the gravel and soil in the dike rather than excavate and haul away. The siphon dam was still in place at the head of the stream. I found no signs of residual oil throughout the course of the stream.
0959494640 2016-08-12 Production Wells No Violations I received a phone call from Dwayne McElhaney to inform me that the siphon dam and absorbent booms had been removed from the stream. On the day of my inspection I found that the siphon dam had been removed, as well as any remaining absorbent booms and pads.
1057763870 2003-07-09 Preliminary Restoration No Violations Pits closed , location graded .
1101721999 2009-04-28 Production Wells No Violations Well capable of production .
1180357887 2009-11-10 Production Wells No Violations Well capable of production .
1452702972 2016-01-13 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the wellhead was equipped with a pumping unit. The electric motor was intact, the valves were open and the unit was in operation. The tank battery consisted of one 210 barrel tank, one 140 barrel tank, one 100 barrel tank and an earthen dike. There were two separators outside of the dike. Identification was posted and I found no leaks or spills. The tank battery is shared with permit 7172.
1461853264 2016-04-26 Production Wells No Violations I was contacted at 11:00 by Jim Aslanides of MFC Drilling to report a spill outside of containment. The initial report was that a brass load valve had failed on a 210 barrel tank, releasing approximately 60 barrels of brine and 8 barrels of oil into the earthen dike. It was also reported that approximately 2 barrels of oil had ran over the dike wall and made it into a stream. I called the Emergency Operations duty number to notify Scott King. He then notified Joshua Schiering who met me at the site. When I arrived on location I spoke with pumper Ray Dillon and contractor Dwayne McElhany. Ray said that the spill was discovered on 4-25-16 around 16:00. I found that the fluid in the dike had been vacuumed out with a water truck. The soil and gravel inside of the dike was contaminated with brine and crude oil. There was a visible path from the dike, downhill to a drainage ditch running parallel with the lease road that was stained with oil, and there were small pools of oil standing in the ditch. The fluid then left the ditch and entered a culvert collection point that was thick with cattails and woody vegetation. The flow entered the culvert, under TR 256 and into a small intermittent stream running east to west toward Center Creek. The crew from Coshocton Pipeline, a contractor for MFC, had set up absorbent booms and pads at various points along the stream. Upon walking the stream I found that the pockets of crude oil were mostly contained by the booms, and the visible sheen dissipated approximately 1500 feet downstream from the point of origin. I did not observe any impacted fish or wildlife. Josh and I collected water samples from the entry point and at the furthest point where there was a visible sheen to field test for chlorides. The chloride content in the sample at the entry point was under 200 ppm, and the chloride content in the sample 1500 feet downstream was negligible. MFC was informed that they must notify Ohio EPA of the incident. I spoke with Trevor Irwi
1464788319 2016-05-31 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that Dwayne McElhaney and Nick Hahn of Coshocton Pipeline were on location removing the tanks from the dike in order to haul the contaminated soil to a landfill. There was a 10 to 12 layer of gravel in the bottom of the dike under the tanks.
1523196669 2020-3-24 0:00: PW No Violations 1.50
1584465122 2020-3-17 0:00: PW No Violations 1.40
1585145618 2020-3-25 0:00: PW No Violations 5.00
1585245749 2020-3-26 0:00: PW No Violations 2.50
1586186105 2020-4-6 0:00:0 PW No Violations 1.30
1587141252 2020-4-17 0:00: PW No Violations 0.70
1587997871 2020-4-27 0:00: PW No Violations 0.70
1589473292 2020-5-13 0:00: PW No Violations 3.00
1591278415 2020-6-4 0:00:0 PW No Violations 0.50
1591974915 2020-6-12 0:00: PW No Violations 3.00
1595345773 2020-7-21 0:00: PW No Violations 1.00
1694051261 2016-06-06 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the 210 barrel and 100 barrel steel tanks had been reset and the earthen dike had been reconstructed. There was a new layer of gravel in the base and the walls had been built up 3 to 4 feet. I found no remaining crude oil contamination inside of the tank battery. Most of the vegetation was starting to regrow in the marshy area where the culverts come together. The siphon dam and absorbent booms were still in place at the head of the stream and at the final collection point from the clean-up. I spoke with Josh Shiering with Emergency Response and he said that he gave MFC the clearance to remove the dam and the booms. He also said that they were allowed to keep the impacted soil in a containment area on top of the hill where they were bio-remediating on site with lime and fertilizer.
1896743935 2007-10-26 Production Wells No Violations Gas well capable of production .
1909282609 2004-06-14 Production Wells No Violations Well in production .
1922500417 2004-01-14 Production Wells No Violations Gas well
2054085137 2016-04-27 Production Wells No Violations On the second day of the clean-up I found that the amount of visible crude oil in the stream had been significantly reduced. Coshocton Pipeline had installed a siphon dam at the point of entry, and there were fresh absorbent pads and boom at various intervals along the stream. The crew had concentrated a high volume of booms and pads at a collection point that was reinforced by a natural dam of woody debris. I found no visible crude oil or sheen downstream from that final collection point. The crew was instructed to remove the booms between the siphon dam and the final collection point in order to allow the stream to flow at a higher rate. They also walked the stream with shovels and a leaf blower to push the remaining oil to the collection point where it could be pulled up with a vacuum truck. Dwayne McElhany removed the layer of top soil that had been impacted outside of the dike and staged the soil in the dike for removal. He also removed the impacted soil in the drainage ditch. Once the stream has remediated, Coshocton Pipeline will focus their efforts on removing the storage tanks and excavating all contaminated soil from inside the dike to be hauled to an approved landfill.
2061669075 2020-3-16 0:00: PW No Violations 3.00
296089098 2016-8-9 0:00:0 PW No Violations 1.00
868439587 2016-5-2 0:00:0 PW No Violations 3.50
959494640 2016-8-12 0:00: PW No Violations 2.00

For data sources see[9]

References

  1. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Well, tblLocational, tblPlugWell, tblInspection, tblCivilTownships and tblPad Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  2. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Well and WellHistry Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  3. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Perfs Table". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  4. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - tblStimulation Table". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  5. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Oil and Gas Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  6. ↑ "Combined Production - Oil and Gas Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  7. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Brine Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  8. ↑ "Combined Production - Brine Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  9. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - tblInspection, tblInspFail and tblinspFlDesc Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
Retrieved from "https://wellwiki-prod.cloud.arc.gwu.edu/index.php?title=34-031-26873&oldid=14149974"