If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
| Well ID: 34-031-27079 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":40.22,"lon":-82.15,"icon":""}]} |
| Country: United States | |
| State: Ohio | |
| County: Coshocton | |
| Municipality: Pike Township | |
| Operator Name: RDB DRILLING LLC | |
| Well Pad ID: | |
| Farm/Lease Name: MOORE | |
| License Status: Producing | |
| License Date: 2007-12-21 | |
| Spud Date: 2008-02-10 | |
| Spud Drilling Contractor: H & D DRILLING | |
| Final Drill Date: 2008-02-12 | |
| Well Total Depth: 3325.00 ft | |
| Configuration: Vertical | |
| Latitude: 40.220000 | |
| Longitude: -82.150000 |
For data sources see[1]
| Well Status | Well Status Date | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| APP | 2007-12-21 | Proposed Formations:CLINTON, Issued Date:12/21/2007, Expired Date:12/20/2008 6:00:00 AM, Drilling unit acres:20, Proposed Well Type:OG, Proposed Well Class:POOL |
| Reached Total Depth | 2008-02-12 | |
| Completion Report Received | 2008-05-22 | |
| Construction Permit Expires | 2008-12-20 | |
| Record Last Modified | 2017-02-15 |
For data sources see[2]
| Perforation Date | Interval Top (ft) | Interval Base (ft) | Number of Shots |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09-03 | 3219 | 3248 | 54 |
| 3219 | 3248 | 54 | |
| 3219 | 3248 | 54 |
For data sources see[3]
| Stimulation Date | Chemical Agent | Chemical Agent Concentration (%) | Fracking Fluid Volume | Mass of Proppant Used (lb) | Fracking Company | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2O | 0 | 61200 Gal | 50000 |
For data sources see[4]
| Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Production Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | 349.00 | 315.00 | 0 |
| 2009 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | 151.00 | 332.00 | 365 |
| 2010 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | 19.00 | 82.00 | 365 |
| 2011 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | 41.00 | 109.00 | 365 |
| 2012 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | 244.00 | 108.00 | 366 |
| 2013 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | 67.00 | 127.00 | 365 |
| 2014 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | 43.00 | 91.00 | 365 |
| 2015 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | 42.00 | 88.00 | 365 |
| 2016 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | 20.00 | 132.00 | 365 |
| 2017 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | 21.00 | 98.00 | 365 |
| 2018 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | 0.00 | 63.00 | 365 |
| Period | Operator Name | Waste Type | Quantity (bbl) | Production Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | Brine | 149 | |
| 2009 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | Brine | 446 | 365 |
| 2010 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | Brine | 39 | 365 |
| 2011 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | Brine | 84 | 365 |
| 2012 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | Brine | 82 | 366 |
| 2013 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | Brine | 6 | 365 |
| 2014 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | Brine | 25 | 365 |
| 2015 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | Brine | 30 | 365 |
| 2016 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | Brine | 1 | 365 |
| 2017 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | Brine | 5 | 365 |
| 2018 | HOPCO RESOURCES INC | Brine | 1 | 365 |
| Inspection ID | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0444582793 | 2018-12-10 | Production Wells | No Violations | On the day of my inspection I found that the well was equipped with a pumping unit that was powered with a Honda engine, which was set up to run on natural gas. The engine was running, but the drivetrain was not engaged. There were no leaks around the wellhead components. The production equipment, which is shared with permits 7077, 7078 and 7105, consisted of six 100 barrel steel tanks and four vertical separators in a shallow earthen dike. There was also one rusted 100 barrel tank in the dike that was empty and not in use. I found no leaks or spills around the tanks, and correct, legible identification was posted at the wellhead and tanks. I called Gregg Boyd to let him know that there was an issue with the pumping unit. |
| 0523793295 | 2016-09-07 | Production Wells | No Violations | On the day of my inspection I found that correct, legible identification was posted at the wellhead and tank battery. The water tank that was rusted at the bottom had been drained and disconnected. The compliance issues have been resolved. |
| 0643836134 | 2008-08-08 | Preliminary Restoration | No Violations | Restoration passed . |
| 0733649296 | 2009-05-12 | Production Wells | No Violations | Well capable of production . |
| 1202322569 | 2008-02-06 | Drill / Deepen / Reopen | No Violations | Ran 7 casing and cemented , H & D drilling , Cemenco |
| 1317556273 | 2016-07-19 | Production Wells | Violations Noted | On the day of my inspection I found that the well was being produced with a natural gas powered pumping unit. The engine was intact, the lines were connected and the valves were open. The unit was in operation at the time of inspection. There were no leaks or spills at the wellhead. There was no identification at the wellhead. The tank battery is shared with permits 7077, 7078 and 7105, and consisted of eight 100 barrel steel tanks, four vertical separators and four meter boxes. An earthen dike was in place around the production equipment. One of the tanks had a bulging rusted spot near the bottom shoulder that was seeping fluid onto the ground. There was no identification posted for any of the wells that share the tank battery. The issues that need addressed to bring this well into compliance are: post correct, legible identification for all four wells at the tank battery; identify each wellhead; replace the 100 barrel tank that is seeping fluid from the bulging rust spot, and remove the impacted soil. I called Gary Hopkins to go over the compliance issues. He agreed to have everything taken care of within 30 days. |
| 1967416562 | 2008-05-05 | Production Wells | No Violations | Well in production . Pit closed , location graded . |
| 444582793 | 2018-12-10 0:00 | PW | No Violations | 0.40 |
| 523793295 | 2016-9-7 0:00:0 | PW | No Violations | 0.50 |
| 643836134 | 2008-8-8 0:00:0 | PL | No Violations | |
| 733649296 | 2009-5-12 0:00: | PW | No Violations |
| Inspection ID | Violation ID | Violation Date | Violation Code | Violation Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1317556273 | US-OH-109070 | 2016-09-29 | Failure to legibly identify well |
For data sources see[9]