X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

34-035-60116

Well Details

Well ID: 34-035-60116
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: <County>
Municipality:
Operator Name: DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: HARSHAW CHEMICAL CO) HARKNESS M
License Status: Producing
License Date: 2001-11-05
Spud Date: 2002-06-27
Spud Drilling Contractor:
Final Drill Date: 2002-06-30
Well Total Depth: 2890.00 ft
Configuration: Vertical
Latitude: 41.440000
Longitude: -81.680000

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
CO 1801-01-02 240 EAST OHIO GAS CO
Oil and Gas 1802-01-01
Completed 1914-09-04 OLD WELL DRILLED TO 2393' IN NEWBERG IN 1914. DEEPENED TO CLINTON 6/2002
CO 1995-04-20 182 BELDEN & BLAKE CO GeoDate
Change of Owner 2001-08-23 Operator changed from 457, ALSID OIL & GAS to 1902, DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC
APP 2001-11-05 Proposed Formations:CLINTON, Issued Date:11/5/2001, Expired Date:11/5/2002 6:00:00 AM, Drilling unit acres:22.82, Proposed Well Type:OG, Proposed Well Class:POOL
Original Spud 2002-06-27 OLD WELL DRILLED TO 2393' IN NEWBERG IN 1914. DEEPENED TO CLINTON 6/2002
Reached Total Depth 2002-06-30 OLD WELL DRILLED TO 2393' IN NEWBERG IN 1914. DEEPENED TO CLINTON 6/2002
Construction Permit Expires 2002-11-05 OLD WELL DRILLED TO 2393' IN NEWBERG IN 1914. DEEPENED TO CLINTON 6/2002
Completion Report Received 2002-11-12 OLD WELL DRILLED TO 2393' IN NEWBERG IN 1914. DEEPENED TO CLINTON 6/2002
Correction to Well 2003-04-11 UNIT SIZE DECREASED TO 20 ACRES.
Record Last Modified 2017-02-15 OLD WELL DRILLED TO 2393' IN NEWBERG IN 1914. DEEPENED TO CLINTON 6/2002

For data sources see[2]

Perforation Treatments

Perforation Date Interval Top (ft) Interval Base (ft) Number of Shots
2003-01-15 2722 2776 40
2722 2776 40
2722 2776 40

For data sources see[3]

Stimulations Data

Stimulation Date Chemical Agent Chemical Agent Concentration (%) Fracking Fluid Volume Mass of Proppant Used (lb) Fracking Company Comments
H2O 15 1500 Bbl 0

For data sources see[4]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Oil Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1997 ALSID OIL & GAS 0.00 0.00 0
1998 ALSID OIL & GAS 0.00 0.00 365
2002 ALSID OIL & GAS 0.00 0.00 0
2003 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC 21189.00 70.00 365
2004 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC 14420.00 57.00 365
2005 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC 3492.00 93.00 365
2006 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC 2116.00 65.00 365
2007 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC 658.00 0.00 365
2008 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC 2015.00 0.00 365
2009 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC 1993.00 83.00 365
2010 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC 1554.00 0.00 365
2011 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC 1697.00 0.00 365
2012 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC 1361.00 0.00 366
2013 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC 1201.00 0.00 365
2014 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC 1026.00 54.00 365
2015 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC 876.00 0.00 365
2016 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC 828.00 0.00 365
2017 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC 652.00 42.00 365
2018 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC 596.00 10.00 365

For data sources see[5] [6]

Waste Data

Period Operator Name Waste Type Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1997 ALSID OIL & GAS Brine 0 0
1998 ALSID OIL & GAS Brine 0 365
2002 ALSID OIL & GAS Brine 0 0
2003 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC Brine 1216 365
2004 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC Brine 480 365
2005 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC Brine 457 365
2006 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC Brine 232 365
2007 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC Brine 381 365
2008 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC Brine 819 365
2009 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC Brine 719 365
2010 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC Brine 675 365
2011 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC Brine 743 365
2012 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC Brine 564 366
2013 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC Brine 538 365
2014 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC Brine 625 365
2015 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC Brine 606 365
2016 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC Brine 539 365
2017 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC Brine 522 365
2018 DUCK CREEK ENERGY INC Brine 494 365

For data sources see[7] [8]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
-391672690 2013-1-7 0:00:0 UP No Violations
0391672690 2013-01-07 UrbanProduction Wells No Violations The producing unit is comprised of a three-tank battery (2 140-barrel, 1 20-barrel) with mechanical separator and a wellhead with pump jack. The wellhead and tank battery are not enclosed. The well is currently in production. The tank and well spacing is in accordance with 1509:9-9-05 . Unit identification is present and legible at the tank battery. The motor on the pump jack has a minor oil leak, which is actively dripping.. Also, the pump jack motor is lacking a belt guard. The tank battery secondary containment is adequate. Otherwise, I did not observe any other leaks, spills, or other signs of contamination. I spoke with Adam Gibler about the oil leak and the need for a belt guard.
0851989967 2016-11-16 UrbanProduction Wells No Violations I inspected this well location as part of routine inspection activity. At the time of this inspection, I observed the following elements: a wellhead with pump jack system and associated tank battery, both located within the confines of a materials supply and storage operation. Fittings and connections at the wellhead were secure and free from signs of leakage or problems with the following exception: There is some leakage of fluid from the 4-inch plugged fitting at the bottom of one of the steel production tanks. Tank lids were closed and secure. Secondary containment was intact and free from signs of spills or leakage. Load lines were plugged and secure. I contacted Larry Gibler with Duck Creek Energy and advised about the need for maintenance at the leaking fitting.
2116071204 2017-10-24 Work Over Reconditioning No Violations I inspected this well location as part of routine inspection activity. The well and battery are located on a parcel otherwise utilized for industrial use. At the time of this inspection, I observed the following: a wellhead with pump jack system which was in operation. Fittings and connections at the well were secure and free from signs of leakage or problems. The well and associated tank battery are located along the eastern fringe of the parking area. The load-lines were plugged and secure. The leakage from the 4-inch load-valve that I had noted during a previous inspection had been fixed. The secondary containment was intact and dry. Signage was present. I walked the areas surrounding the well and battery and found no signs of degradation or impact to the natural greenscape.
851989967 2016-11-16 0:00 UP No Violations 1.00

For data sources see[9]

References

  1. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Well, tblLocational, tblPlugWell, tblInspection, tblCivilTownships and tblPad Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  2. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Well and WellHistry Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  3. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Perfs Table". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  4. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - tblStimulation Table". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  5. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Oil and Gas Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  6. ↑ "Combined Production - Oil and Gas Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  7. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Brine Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  8. ↑ "Combined Production - Brine Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  9. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - tblInspection, tblInspFail and tblinspFlDesc Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
Retrieved from "https://wellwiki-prod.cloud.arc.gwu.edu/index.php?title=34-035-60116&oldid=14179509"