If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
Well ID: 34-155-24029 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":41.37,"lon":-80.86,"icon":""}]} |
Country: United States | |
State: Ohio | |
County: Trumbull | |
Municipality: Bristol Township | |
Operator Name: CEDAR VALLEY ENERGY INC | |
Well Pad ID: | |
Farm/Lease Name: KING REX | |
License Status: Producing | |
License Date: 2010-08-25 | |
Spud Date: 2010-10-18 | |
Spud Drilling Contractor: POULSON DRILLING | |
Final Drill Date: 2010-10-22 | |
Well Total Depth: 4266.00 ft | |
Configuration: Vertical | |
Latitude: 41.370000 | |
Longitude: -80.860000 |
For data sources see[1]
Well Status | Well Status Date | Comment |
---|---|---|
APP | 2010-08-25 | Proposed Formations:CLINTON, Issued Date:8/25/2010, Expired Date:8/24/2012 12:00:00 PM, Drilling unit acres:40.3, Proposed Well Type:OG, Proposed Well Class:POOL |
Reached Total Depth | 2010-10-22 | |
Completion Report Received | 2011-01-04 | |
Construction Permit Expires | 2012-08-24 | |
Record Last Modified | 2017-10-24 |
For data sources see[2]
Perforation Date | Interval Top (ft) | Interval Base (ft) | Number of Shots |
---|---|---|---|
2011-05-05 | 4042 | 4083 | 27 |
4042 | 4083 | 27 | |
4042 | 4083 | 27 |
For data sources see[3]
Stimulation Date | Chemical Agent | Chemical Agent Concentration (%) | Fracking Fluid Volume | Mass of Proppant Used (lb) | Fracking Company | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010-11-03 | H2O | 15 | 95000 Gal | 58000 | Universal Well Services Inc. |
For data sources see[4]
Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | CEDAR VALLEY ENERGY INC | 6392.00 | 866.00 | 365 |
2012 | CEDAR VALLEY ENERGY INC | 3503.00 | 468.00 | 366 |
2013 | CEDAR VALLEY ENERGY INC | 2088.00 | 328.00 | 365 |
2014 | CEDAR VALLEY ENERGY INC | 1600.00 | 319.00 | 365 |
2015 | CEDAR VALLEY ENERGY INC | 1350.00 | 222.00 | 365 |
2016 | CEDAR VALLEY ENERGY INC | 1578.00 | 304.00 | 365 |
2017 | CEDAR VALLEY ENERGY INC | 1682.00 | 203.00 | 365 |
2018 | CEDAR VALLEY ENERGY INC | 1408.00 | 215.00 | 365 |
Period | Operator Name | Waste Type | Quantity (bbl) | Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | CEDAR VALLEY ENERGY INC | Brine | 1025 | 365 |
2012 | CEDAR VALLEY ENERGY INC | Brine | 668 | 366 |
2013 | CEDAR VALLEY ENERGY INC | Brine | 451 | 365 |
2014 | CEDAR VALLEY ENERGY INC | Brine | 392 | 365 |
2015 | CEDAR VALLEY ENERGY INC | Brine | 380 | 365 |
2016 | CEDAR VALLEY ENERGY INC | Brine | 469 | 365 |
2017 | CEDAR VALLEY ENERGY INC | Brine | 367 | 365 |
2018 | CEDAR VALLEY ENERGY INC | Brine | 179 | 365 |
Inspection ID | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
-1842751593 | 2013-8-28 0:00: | PW | No Violations | 0.50 |
-2114399842 | 2011-6-29 0:00: | PL | No Violations | |
0103998125 | 2019-03-13 | Production Wells | No Violations | At the time of this inspection, the well was equipped with a pumping unit. The valve on the tubing was open and 2 inch flow line was open. The diked tank battery consisted of one 100 BBL tank, one 50 BBL steel tank, and a mechanical separator. Valves on the separator were open and the chart showed production. Legible identification was present at the well and tank battery and the lease access was stable. No violations observed. |
0143728121 | 2015-11-16 | Production Wells | No Violations | I was on location for a status check. During my inspection, I found the well in production. The well is equipped with a pumpjack. The tank battery consists of a 100 barrel production tank, a 50 barrel brine tank, and a mechanical separator. A dike surrounds the tank battery. There is an identification sign posted. There is a plug on the load line. The lease road is in good repair. |
103998125 | 2019-3-13 0:00: | PW | No Violations | 0.40 |
143728121 | 2015-11-16 0:00 | PW | No Violations | 0.50 |
1497964842 | 2017-06-20 | Production Wells | No Violations
-up lines have plugs. The access road is in good repair. The equipment on site:
| |
1530214495 | 2018-06-28 | Production Wells | No Violations | At the time of this inspection, the well was equipped with a pumping unit and the valve on the tubing was open. The 2 inch flow line valve was open. Production records for this well were current. The tank battery consisted of one 100 BBL tank, one 50 BBL steel tank, and a mechanical separator. Valves on the separator were open and the chart showed production. The tank battery was diked and had legible signage. The lease access was stable. No violations observed. |
1656691118 | 2013-07-31 | Production Wells | No Violations | My inspection found the well in production. The well was equipped with a pumping unit. The tank battery contained a 100 barrel production tank, a 50 barrel brine tank, and a separator. The proper identification sign was posted on the production tank. There were plugs on the load lines. The dike meets containment requirements. There was water inside the dike with an approximate 2-3 depth at the north end that thinned out towards the south of the tank battery. I noticed a stretch of orange tinted water on the outside of the dike located at the north end of the tank battery. The grass in that area was partially dead. I sampled the water with one low level and one high level Quantab. The result was a 6.2 on the low level that comes out to 363 parts/million and a 2.8 on the high level that comes out to 396 parts/million. The pH read 8. Photos of the area were taken. I sampled the water inside the dike using a low level Quantab. My result was a 4 that comes out to 161 parts/million. I called Tim Cosma, Cedar Valley supervisor, and informed him of my findings. I instructed Tim to clean-up the affected area. |
1842751593 | 2013-08-28 | Production Wells | No Violations | My inspection found the affected area with the orange tinted water on the outside of the dike at the north end of the tank battery cleaned up per my request. The area was graded with clean soil. New photos were taken. |
2114399842 | 2011-06-29 | Preliminary Restoration | No Violations | Preliminary restoration was completed and meets requirements. |
For data sources see[9]