If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
Well ID: 37-005-23272 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":40.822368,"lon":-79.307215,"icon":""}]} |
Country: United States | |
State: Pennsylvania | |
County: Armstrong | |
Municipality: Cowanshannock Township | |
Operator Name: GREYLOCK CONVENTIONAL LLC | |
Well Pad ID: | |
Farm/Lease Name: G S GRIFFITH 1 | |
License Status: ACTIVE | |
Spud Date: | |
Permit Date: 1985-08-01 | |
Well Type: GAS | |
Unconventional Well: N | |
Configuration: Vertical Well | |
Conservation: No | |
Latitude: 40.822368 | |
Longitude: -79.307215 |
Date | Event |
---|---|
1985-08-01 | New Permit Application |
1985-09-04 | Performed Spud Operation |
1985-09-17 | Drilling Completion |
1986-01-10 | NEWLY DRILLED |
For data sources see[4]
Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Gas Production Days | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Oil Production Days | Water Quantity (bbl) | Water Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1991 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 3731.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
1996 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1561 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
1997 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 2454 | 334 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
1998 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 2492 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
1999 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 2774 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2000 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 2223 | 366 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2001 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1975 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2002 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1932 | 360 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2003 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1724 | 359 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2004 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1665 | 366 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2005 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1619 | 335 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2006 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1692.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2007 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1275.00 | 364 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2008 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1250.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2009 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1213.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2010 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1,334.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2011 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1,388.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2012 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1,350.00 | 366 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2013 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1,393.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2014 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1,204.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2015 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1,007.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2016 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 993.00 | 366 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2017 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 1,069.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2018 | GREYLOCK CONVENTIONAL LLC | 1,020.00 | 358 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2019 | GREYLOCK CONVENTIONAL LLC | 966.00 | 358 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
For data sources see[5]
Period | Operator | Waste Type | Quantity | Disposal Method | Waste Facility ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1991 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Brine | 35.00 Bbl |
For data sources see[6]
Inspection ID | Inspection Category | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2603918 | Primary Facility | 2017-06-14 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | Well appeared to be equipped for production. Brine tank had recently been removed. There was no evidence observed to indicated there had been any issues with the tank while it was onsite and in use. There was no observed accelerated erosion in relation to the site or access road. |
For data sources see[7]