If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
Well ID: 37-059-25713 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":39.882964,"lon":-79.988694,"icon":""}]} |
Country: United States | |
State: Pennsylvania | |
County: Greene | |
Municipality: Cumberland Township | |
Operator Name: GREYLOCK PROD LLC | |
Well Pad ID: 148541 | |
Farm/Lease Name: HOGE/NOCE 5MH | |
License Status: | |
Spud Date: | |
Permit Date: 2011-04-21 | |
Well Type: GAS | |
Unconventional Well: Y | |
Configuration: Horizontal Well | |
Conservation: No | |
Latitude: 39.882964 | |
Longitude: -79.988694 |
Date | Event |
---|---|
2011-04-21 | New Permit Application |
2012-04-02 | New Permit Application |
2012-06-30 | Performed Spud Operation |
2012-08-10 | Drilling Completion |
2012-10-03 | Perforation |
2012-10-03 | Performed Stimulation |
2013-04-18 | DEVIATED |
For data sources see[4]
Job Number | Job Start Date | Job End Date | True Vertical Depth (ft) | Total Water Volume (gal) | Total Non-Water Volume (gal) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2012-10-01 | 2012-10-04 | 8,080 | 3,483,650 | 0 |
Job Number | Trade Name | Supplier | Purpose | Ingredient Name | CAS Number | Additive Percentage by Mass | Job Percentage by Mass | Mass Used (lb) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Scale Hib 100 | Universal Well Services | Scale Inhibitor | Ethylene Glycol | 107-21-1 | 60 | 0.01562 | 5013.84 |
EC6116A | Universal Well Services | Biocide | 2,2-Dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide | 10222-01-2 | 30 | 0.00878 | 2817.6 | |
Dibromoacetonitrile | 3252-43-5 | 5 | 0.00146 | 469.6 | ||||
Polyethylene Glycol | 25322-68-3 | 60 | 0.01756 | 5635.19 | ||||
Proppant-40/70 | Universal Well Services | Proppant | crystalline silica quartz | 14808-60-7 | 100 | 7.02547 | 2,254,730.0 | |
LEB 10X | Universal Well Services | Breaker | Ethylene Glycol | 107-21-1 | 60 | 0.00065 | 207.317 | |
Unislick ST-50 | Universal Well Services | Friction Reducer | Hydrotreated Light Distillate | 64742-47-8 | 30 | 0.02354 | 7555.57 | |
Unihib G | Universal Well Services | Corrosion Inhibitor for Acid | Short chained glycol ether | N/A | 25 | 0.00041 | 132.511 | |
2-Ethyl Hexanol | 104-76-7 | 75 | 0.00124 | 397.532 | ||||
15% Hydrochloric Acid (UWS) | Universal Well Services | Acid | Hydrochloric Acid | 7647-01-0 | 15 | 0.16366 | 52524.1 | |
Proppant-100 Mesh | Universal Well Services | Proppant | crystalline silica quartz | 14808-60-7 | 100 | 1.30079 | 417471 | |
I-7L | Universal Well Services | Iron Control for Acid | Ethylene Glycol | 107-21-1 | 30 | 0.00733 | 2352.53 | |
Water | ECA | Base Fluid | Water | N/A | 100 | 90.4189 | 29,018,800.0 | |
WGA-3, CMHPG | Universal Well Services | Dry Gellant | Guar Gum | 9000-30-0 | 100 | 0.0028 | 900 |
For data sources see[5]
Stimulation Date | Phase Number | Chemical Agent | Volume (gal) | Treating Pressure (psi) | Breakdown Pressure (psi) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012-10-03 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
For data sources see[6]
Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Gas Production Days | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Oil Production Days | Water Quantity (bbl) | Water Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2012 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 152,306.00 | 85 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2013 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 598,623.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2014 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 339,613.00 | 362 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2015 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 262,450.00 | 335 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2016 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 217,790.00 | 361 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2017 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | 181,716.00 | 337 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2018 | GREYLOCK PROD LLC | 149,027.00 | 339 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2019 | GREYLOCK PROD LLC | 145,348.00 | 356 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
For data sources see[7]
Period | Operator | Waste Type | Quantity | Disposal Method | Waste Facility ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Drill Cuttings | 25.48 Tons | LANDFILL | SWF 1032-WV0109 |
2012 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Fracturing Fluid Waste | 9.00 Tons | LANDFILL | SWF 1032-WV0109 |
2012 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Drilling Fluid Waste | 41.33 Bbl | LANDFILL | SWF 1032-WV0109 |
2012 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Drill Cuttings | 611.25 Tons | LANDFILL | 100277 |
2013 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Fracturing Fluid Waste | 207.83 Tons | LANDFILL | 100172 |
2013 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Produced Fluid | 8,973.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
2013 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Drilling Fluid Waste | 8,107.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
2013 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Fracing Fluid Waste | 27,142.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
2013 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Fracturing Fluid Waste | 241.01 Tons | LANDFILL | 100592 |
2013 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Fracturing Fluid Waste | 210.76 Tons | LANDFILL | 100663 |
2013 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Fracturing Fluid Waste | 173.65 Tons | LANDFILL | 100620 |
2013 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Fracturing Fluid Waste | 218.31 Tons | LANDFILL | 100280 |
2013 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Fracturing Fluid Waste | 142.53 Tons | LANDFILL | 100277 |
2014 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Produced Fluid | 5,336.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
2015 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Produced Fluid | 90.00 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123SW010 |
2015 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Produced Fluid | 661.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
2016 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Produced Fluid | 155.00 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123SW001 |
2016 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Produced Fluid | 480.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
2017 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Produced Fluid | 520.00 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
2017 | ENERGY CORP OF AMER | Produced Fluid | 225.00 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123SW010 |
2018 | GREYLOCK PROD LLC | Produced Fluid | 295.00 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
2018 | GREYLOCK PROD LLC | Produced Fluid | 220.00 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123SW010 |
2018 | GREYLOCK PROD LLC | Produced Fluid | 60.00 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123SW005 |
2019 | GREYLOCK PROD LLC | Produced Fluid | 172.00 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
2019 | GREYLOCK PROD LLC | Produced Fluid | 101.00 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123SW010 |
For data sources see[8]
Inspection ID | Inspection Category | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2112713 | Primary Facility | 2012-10-31 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | SITE LOOKED GOOD AT TIME OF INSPECTION. |
2282821 | Primary Facility | 2014-06-24 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | On 6/24/2014, the Department conducted an inspection of ECA's HOGE/NOCE 1MH thru 5MH well site in Cumberland Twp., Greene County. |
2285725 | Primary Facility | 2014-07-09 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | On 7/9/2014, the Department conducted a Notice of Termination inspection of ECA's HOGE/NOCE 1MH WELL SITE in Cumberland Twp., Greene County. |
2688188 | Primary Facility | 2018-01-04 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | The Act 9 sign was in place and all required documents were present at the site. The site was snow covered at the time of inspection and site vegetation could not be inspected. What appeared to be a possible leak from the #2 GPU hammer union was observed. It is recommended the unit be inspected to insure fluids are not being released. |
For data sources see[9]