If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
| Well ID: 37-115-20585 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":41.8918,"lon":-76.004753,"icon":""}]} |
| Country: United States | |
| State: Pennsylvania | |
| County: Susquehanna | |
| Municipality: Forest Lake Township | |
| Operator Name: BKV OPR LLC | |
| Well Pad ID: 145325 | |
| Farm/Lease Name: BAKER WEST 2H | |
| License Status: | |
| Spud Date: | |
| Permit Date: 2011-05-16 | |
| Well Type: GAS | |
| Unconventional Well: Y | |
| Configuration: Horizontal Well | |
| Conservation: No | |
| Latitude: 41.8918 | |
| Longitude: -76.004753 |
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2011-05-16 | New Permit Application |
| 2011-07-14 | Performed Spud Operation |
| 2011-12-03 | Drilling Completion |
| 2012-08-17 | DEVIATED |
For data sources see[4]
| Job Number | Job Start Date | Job End Date | True Vertical Depth (ft) | Total Water Volume (gal) | Total Non-Water Volume (gal) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012-05-27 | 2012-05-27 | 6,360 | 6,876,576 |
| Job Number | Trade Name | Supplier | Purpose | Ingredient Name | CAS Number | Additive Percentage by Mass | Job Percentage by Mass | Mass Used (lb) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||||
| Ingredients shown above are subject to 29 CFR 1910.1200(i) and appear on Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS). Ingredients shown below are Non-MSDS. |
||||||||
| mesh | Hughes | Proppant | ||||||
| Alpha 1427 | Baker Hughes | Biocide | Didecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride | 7173-51-5 | 10.00 | 0.00224000 | ||
| Quaternary ammonium compounds, benzyl-C12-16-alkyldimethyl, chlorides |
68424-85-1 | 5.00 | 0.00112000 | |||||
| Ethanol | 64-17-5 | 5.00 | 0.00112000 | |||||
| Glutaraldehyde | 111-30-8 | 30.00 | 0.00671000 | |||||
| Scaletrol 720 | Baker Hughes | Scale Inhibitor | Ethylene glycol | 107-21-1 | 30.00 | 0.00459000 | ||
| Calcium chloride | 10043-52-4 | 5.00 | 0.00077000 | |||||
| Sand, White, 100 | Baker Hughes | Proppant | Quartz | 14808-60-7 | 100.00 | 0.83 | ||
| Sand, White, 30/50 | Baker Hughes | Proppant | Quartz | 14808-60-7 | 100.00 | 6.17 | ||
| CI-14 | Baker Hughes | Corrosion Inhibitor | Methanol | 67-56-1 | 100.00 | 0.00053000 | ||
| Propargyl alcohol | 107-19-7 | 5.00 | 0.00003000 | |||||
| Alkenes, C>10 .alpha.- | 64743-02-8 | 5.00 | 0.00003000 | |||||
| Fatty acids, tall-oil | 61790-12-3 | 10.00 | 0.00005000 | |||||
| Ethoxylated C14-15 alcohols | 68951-67-7 | 30.00 | 0.00016000 | |||||
| Ferrotrol 300L | Baker Hughes | Iron Control | Citric acid | 77-92-9 | 60.00 | 0.00139000 | ||
| Hydrochloric Acid 5.1-7.5 | Baker Hughes | Acidizing | Hydrochloric acid | 7647-01-0 | 7.50 | 0.05 | ||
| Water | 7732-18-5 | 92.50 | 0.65 | |||||
| Sand, White, 40/70 | Baker Hughes | Proppant | Quartz | 14808-60-7 | 100.00 | 4.64 | ||
| Ingredients shown above are subject to 29 CFR 1910.1200(i) and appear on Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS). Ingredients shown below are Non-MSDS. |
Baker Hughes | Surfactant | Salt | 0.00339699 | ||||
| Sodium chloride | 7647-14-5 | 0.00000459 | ||||||
| Poly (acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) | 0.02 | |||||||
| Ethoxylated Alcohol | 0.00135880 | |||||||
| Polyacrylate | 0.00306192 | |||||||
| Formalin | 50-00-0 | |||||||
| Sorbitan Monooleate | 0.00339699 | |||||||
| Hydrochloric acid | 7647-01-0 | |||||||
| Water | 7732-18-5 | 0.05 | ||||||
| Thiourea polymer | 68527-49-1 | |||||||
| Potassium chloride | 7447-40-7 | 0.00000765 | ||||||
| InFlo 250W | Baker Hughes | Surfactant | Surfactants | 80.00 | 0.00049000 | |||
| 2-Butoxyethanol | 111-76-2 | 5.00 | 0.00003000 | |||||
| Methanol | 67-56-1 | 30.00 | 0.00018000 | |||||
| FRW-18 | Baker Hughes | Friction Reducer | Distillates, petroleum, hydrotreated light | 64742-47-8 | 30.00 | 0.02 | ||
| Water | Operator | Carrier | Water | 7732-18-5 | 100.00 | 87.50 |
For data sources see[5]
| Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Gas Production Days | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Oil Production Days | Water Quantity (bbl) | Water Production Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2012 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | 1,197,727.00 | 204 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2013 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | 846,788.00 | 308 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2014 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | 21,644.51 | 12 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2015 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | 16,557.26 | 15 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2016 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | 188,819.38 | 74 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2017 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | 735,449.15 | 363 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2018 | BKV OPR LLC | 488,078.85 | 364 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2019 | BKV OPR LLC | 344,861.36 | 363 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
For data sources see[6]
| Period | Operator | Waste Type | Quantity | Disposal Method | Waste Facility ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Drill Cuttings | 458.40 Tons | LANDFILL | THR029 |
| 2012 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Produced Fluid | 28,548.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2013 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Produced Fluid | 451.00 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NE003 |
| 2013 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Produced Fluid | 2,406.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2015 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Produced Fluid | 3.32 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NC018 |
| 2015 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Produced Fluid | 83.43 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NE003 |
| 2015 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Produced Fluid | 21.49 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123 |
| 2015 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Produced Fluid | 266.12 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2016 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 18.25 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NC018 |
| 2016 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Produced Fluid | 174.01 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NC010 |
| 2016 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Produced Fluid | 131.48 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NE003 |
| 2016 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Produced Fluid | 31.43 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NE003 |
| 2016 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Produced Fluid | 63.96 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NC010 |
| 2016 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Basic Sediment | 333.33 Bbl | LANDFILL | THR029 |
| 2016 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 18.25 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NE003 |
| 2017 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Produced Fluid | 548.70 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NC018 |
| 2017 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Produced Fluid | 172.60 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NC010 |
| 2017 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Produced Fluid | 73.70 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
| 2017 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Produced Fluid | 397.45 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NE003 |
| 2017 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Produced Fluid | 36.87 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123 |
| 2018 | BKV OPR LLC | Produced Fluid | 35.00 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NE003 |
| 2018 | BKV OPR LLC | Produced Fluid | 70.00 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
| 2018 | CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC | Produced Fluid | 509.56 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NC018 |
| 2019 | BKV OPR LLC | Produced Fluid | 35.32 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
| 2019 | BKV OPR LLC | Produced Fluid | 175.00 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NE003 |
| 2019 | BKV OPR LLC | Produced Fluid | 451.19 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NC018 |
For data sources see[7]
| Inspection ID | Inspection Category | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007313 | Primary Facility | 2011-09-29 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 2077571 | Primary Facility | 2012-06-13 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | During the investigation, I used an Extech, ExStik (2) pH, Conductivity, Salinty and TDS meter to field screen ponded water inside the containment area where the on-site mobile pretreatment system to filter frac flowback fluid is located. I also screened an area outside the containment area in the NW corner of the Well Pad and the edge of the Well Pad off containment behind the storage tanks. Conductivity, Salinity and TDS readings indicated over the limit, with the limit on the meter being 19.99 milliSiemens/cm. I performed sampling analysis of (2) areas of ponded water behind the storage tanks in the west section of the Well Pad, based on the readings on my meter. I departed from the site at 14:00. |
| 2081568 | Primary Facility | 2012-06-18 | Incident- Response to Accident or Event | No Violations Noted | Violations and specifics associated with this inspection report can be referred to in the Baker West 1H inspection report. Permit number is 115-20586. |
| 2356107 | Primary Facility | 2015-03-30 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 2419289 | Primary Facility | 2015-10-27 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection, arrived on site at 11:15, the cellar had water at the bottom, the (9x5½) vent pipe was open and venting to a tank, it appeared the well was not in production at time of inspection. I took a walk around the location and everything looked OK. |
| 2451815 | Primary Facility | 2016-01-21 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | The Department was on site to inspect the Baker West well pad (ESX10-115-0081 (01)). The wells associated with the pad are as follows:
115-20584 115-20585 115-20586 The site was stable and well vegetated with no apparent erosional issues. There were no violations. If there are any issues please feel free to contact me. |
| 2513785 | Primary Facility | 2016-08-25 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection, arrived on site at 12:30p.m., the cellar was empty; the (9x5) vent pipe was open and venting into a tank. The production casing has been connected to the production line. There was 1354psi on the production casing and about 1360psi on the production line. I took a walk around the location and everything looked OK.
I left the site at 13:05p.m. |
| 2544473 | Primary Facility | 2016-10-25 | Site Restoration | No Violations Noted | The Department was on site to inspect the Baker well pad (ESX10-115-0029). The wells associated with the pad are as follows:
115-20471 115-20470 115-20469 115-20468 115-20467 115-20466 115-20465 The well pad was vegetated in excess of the 70% perennial vegetative standard, the grading was up to par and the temporary BMPs had been removed from the site. The site was stable and well vegetated with no apparent erosional issues. I recommend APPROVAL of this Notice Of Termination. There were no violations. If there are any issues please feel free to contact me. |
| 2608697 | Primary Facility | 2017-06-27 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection, arrived on site at 13:20p.m.
The cellar was about a quarter full of water with no bubbling noticed. The (9x5) annulus vent pipe was open and venting into the production tank. There was 578psi on the production casing and 438psi on the production line. I noticed staining on the ground near the 3H well, I showed Matt Mercaldo of J P Reilly (contractor for Carrizo) where the stain was and he said he would get it cleaned up. I contacted Frank Hoehle (DEP water quality specialist) to let him know of the staining and he said he would do a follow-up inspection. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. I left the site at 14:00p.m. |
| 2622502 | Primary Facility | 2017-08-04 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | I inspected the Baker West well pad on July 20, 2017. The access road leading in was in good condition, with no debris leaving the site onto the macadam road (Turnpike Road). The well pad itself was solid and stable as well, with no excessive mud or ponding. There was some ponding but it just rained heavily the previous day. The cut slope had vegetation where it was not rock. The fill slopes were stable and solid despite recent heavy rains. All vegetation on site was thick, lush and perennial. There were no erosional issues observed during the inspection.
There were no violations noted. |
| 2715655 | Primary Facility | 2018-04-04 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection.
The well was in production. There was cement between the (20x13) and (13x9) annuli and there was no gas detected. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted. |
| 2816511 | Primary Facility | 2018-12-17 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection.
The well was in production. There was water 3' below grade in the cellar with no bubbling noticed and there was no gas detected in the remainder of the cellar with a MSA Altair 5X multi gas detector that was calibrated on 12/3/18. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted. |
| 2851761 | Primary Facility | 2019-03-11 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | I inspected the Baker West well site on March 11, 2019. The weather was sunny and about 33 degrees F. The site had no activity at the time of inspection. There was a considerable amount of snow and ice still on site.
The access road and well pad surface were fairly icy but stable and did not have any mud or erosional issues. The wells on the pad surface were all enclosed in carports, with clean gravel surrounding them and legible signs on each. The infiltration basins and fill slopes were stable, as were the cut slope areas. The cut slope had a rocky appearance without much vegetation due to the nature of the ground, and no erosion was noted. There was a logging operation noted but it was off the well site LOD. It was not affecting the wellsite. The containment structure surrounding the production tanks and equipment had sufficient freeboard. There were no areas of instability noted onsite and no sheen was noted on any water surfaces during the inspection. There were no violations noted. |
For data sources see[8]