If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
Well ID: 37-115-20670 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":41.827681,"lon":-75.742378,"icon":""}]} |
Country: United States | |
State: Pennsylvania | |
County: Susquehanna | |
Municipality: New Milford Township | |
Operator Name: SWN PROD CO LLC | |
Well Pad ID: 144552 | |
Farm/Lease Name: FOLGER 1H | |
License Status: | |
Spud Date: | |
Permit Date: 2011-10-05 | |
Well Type: GAS | |
Unconventional Well: Y | |
Configuration: Horizontal Well | |
Conservation: No | |
Latitude: 41.827681 | |
Longitude: -75.742378 |
Date | Event |
---|---|
2011-10-05 | New Permit Application |
2011-10-21 | Performed Spud Operation |
2012-02-02 | Drilling Completion |
2013-02-07 | Perforation |
2013-02-07 | Performed Stimulation |
2013-05-24 | DEVIATED |
For data sources see[4]
Job Number | Job Start Date | Job End Date | True Vertical Depth (ft) | Total Water Volume (gal) | Total Non-Water Volume (gal) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2013-02-04 | 2013-02-04 | 6,793 | 5,978,952 |
Job Number | Trade Name | Supplier | Purpose | Ingredient Name | CAS Number | Additive Percentage by Mass | Job Percentage by Mass | Mass Used (lb) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | SI-115 | Clearwater International | Scale Inhibitor | Phosphonic acid, [[(phosphonomethyl)imino]bis[2,1-ethanediylnitrilobis(methylene)]]tetrakis-, sodium salt |
22042-96-2 | 20.00 | 0.00226000 | |
15 HCl | Clearwater International | Acid | Hydrochloric acid | 7647-01-0 | 15.00 | 0.11 | ||
AI-250 | Clearwater International | Acid Inhibitor | Isopropanol | 67-63-0 | 40.00 | 0.00077000 | ||
Propargyl alcohol | 107-19-7 | 40.00 | 0.00077000 | |||||
APS 920 | Clearwater International | Friction Reducer | Non Hazardous | 200.00 | 0.20 | |||
Biocide EC 6116A | Nalco | Biocide | 2,2-Dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide | 30.00 | 0.00411000 | |||
Dibromoacetonitrile | 3252-43-5 | 5.00 | 0.00068000 | |||||
Polyethylene glycol | 25322-68-3 | 60.00 | 0.00822000 | |||||
Chemical Name | Southwestern Energy | Sand | ||||||
Chemical Name | Southwestern Energy | Water/Produced Water | ||||||
Chemical Name | Purpose | H2O + Disolved Salts | 100.00 | 90.78 | ||||
Ingredients | ||||||||
Quartz | 14808-60-7 | 100.00 | 8.31 |
For data sources see[5]
Stimulation Date | Phase Number | Chemical Agent | Volume (gal) | Treating Pressure (psi) | Breakdown Pressure (psi) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013-02-07 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
For data sources see[6]
Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Gas Production Days | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Oil Production Days | Water Quantity (bbl) | Water Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2012 | SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2013 | SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO | 606,793.00 | 248 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2014 | SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO | 907,414.00 | 362 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2015 | SWN PROD CO LLC | 658,212.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2016 | SWN PROD CO LLC | 542,755.00 | 366 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2017 | SWN PROD CO LLC | 307,108.00 | 364 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2018 | SWN PROD CO LLC | 356,245.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2019 | SWN PROD CO LLC | 351,674.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
For data sources see[7]
Period | Operator | Waste Type | Quantity | Disposal Method | Waste Facility ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012 | SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO | Drilling Fluid Waste | 265.00 Bbl | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | WMGR119 |
2012 | SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO | Drill Cuttings | 717.93 Tons | LANDFILL | THR029 |
2013 | SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 6,760.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
2013 | SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO | Drill Cuttings | 18.67 Tons | LANDFILL | 101247 |
2013 | SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO | Fracturing Fluid Waste | 20.84 Tons | LANDFILL | 101247 |
2013 | SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO | Fracing Fluid Waste | 4,130.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
2014 | SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 1,956.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
2015 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 742.75 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
2016 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 35.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
2016 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 431.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
2017 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 50.00 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 95-16-65420-013 |
2017 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 170.00 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 95-16-65420-013 |
2018 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 58.50 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
2018 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 460.25 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 95-16-65420-013 |
2018 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 93.25 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 826342 |
2018 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 177.83 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 95-16-65420-013 |
2019 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 243.25 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 95-16-65420-013 |
2019 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 57.50 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 826342 |
2019 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 37.04 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 95-16-65420-013 |
For data sources see[8]
Inspection ID | Inspection Category | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014450 | Primary Facility | 2011-10-25 | Drilling/Alteration | No Violations Noted | DEP arrived on site 14:30 pm. Minichi spud rig on site spudding in well. Site ID sign in place with proper permit information posted. No violations observed. |
2041353 | Primary Facility | 2012-02-06 | Drilling/Alteration | No Violations Noted | Company Man = Joe Davis. Rig is DDI-10. Have set 5 1/2" at 9545'. Cemented up to approx. 1875'. 20 " is set at 76', 13 3/8" set at 650', 9 5/8" set at 1635'. 5 /12" set at 9545. Currently breaking down rig and morving to Barkems Squirrel location. Drilers log on site and up to date. noted: encountered a 100' fault at @ 2750 into lateral.. |
2152523 | Primary Facility | 2013-03-29 | Routine/Partial Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
2208546 | Primary Facility | 2013-09-24 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | Refer to inspection ID # 2208531 |
2208792 | Primary Facility | 2013-09-24 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | Refer to inspection ID # 2208782 |
2260923 | Primary Facility | 2014-04-08 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | On 4/8/14, the Department conducted a follow-up inspection of SWN RU 32 Folger Pad where violations had been noted by the Department during a 9/24/13 inspection. The cut slope has been effectively stabilized. As of this inspection, violations noted in the 9/24/13 inspection have been corrected/abated. |
2359311 | Primary Facility | 2015-04-07 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
2477437 | Primary Facility | 2016-04-22 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
2488555 | Primary Facility | 2016-05-31 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
2558039 | Primary Facility | 2017-02-01 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection, arrived on site at 15:25p.m., the cellar was full of gravel and there was no gas detected at the perimeter of the cellar. The vent pipe was open and set up with a Taylor plug to check for pressure and the valve going to the production tank was closed. There was 557psi on the production casing and 507psi on the production line. I took a walk around the location and noticed that the entire site was covered with snow except a section between the production tanks and the production units. I contacted Gene Rickard (DEP WQS) to let him know about the well site.
I left the site at 16:05p.m. |
2564074 | Primary Facility | 2017-02-02 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | Today’s inspection was conducted after a Department Oil and Gas Inspector noticed a large area of unfrozen standing water on the well pad surface near the production tanks and production units. The unfrozen water is unusual in respect to the fact that recent and current temperatures have been and are well below freezing. The Department employed an Extech Instruments ExStik 2 Conductivity Meter, tested the water and found the conductivity to be around 90 microsiemens, a relatively low number. Of note is the fact that algae was present and thriving in the standing water. The presence of the algae suggests that the water is probably an expression of ground water which would also explain the temperatures recorded of the standing water of 9 degrees Celsius. Overall, the pad site looked good with no E&S violations observed. |
2564093 | Primary Facility | 2017-02-06 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | Today’s inspection is being conducted after having consulted with a Department Geologist and a Department Oil and Gas Inspector in reference to the standing water observed on the SWN RU 32 Folger Pad. The consensus was that it would be prudent for the Department to collect samples, soil and water, of the standing unfrozen water and associated contact soil on the pad to ensure that the presence of the standing unfrozen water is a natural phenomenon. Present during the inspection was myself, Jon Sassi, Department EPS, Eric Rooney, Department LPG, David Schoonover, Department OGI, and Mike Deming, SWN Senior Regulatory Analyst. Mr. Deming did state that SWN has always been aware of the standing water and that its presence has been attributed to the theory that the water is a natural expression of ground water. The Department collected 3 separate samples, one soil sample and two water samples. The soil sample, 0257238, will be tested for glycol and methanol. One of the water samples, 0257239 will be tested |
2651855 | Primary Facility | 2017-10-25 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection.
The well was in production. The cellar was full of gravel and there was no gas detected at the perimeter of the cellar. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violation noted. |
2753332 | Primary Facility | 2018-07-18 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection.
The well was in production. The cellar was full of gravel and there was no gas detected at the perimeter of the cellar. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted. |
2855694 | Primary Facility | 2019-03-19 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection.
The well was in production. The cellar was full of gravel and there was no gas detected at the perimeter of the cellar with a MSA Altair 5X multi gas detector that was calibrated on 3/4/19. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted. |
For data sources see[9]