If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
Well ID: 37-115-21849 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":41.780131,"lon":-75.761892,"icon":""}]} |
Country: United States | |
State: Pennsylvania | |
County: Susquehanna | |
Municipality: Harford Township | |
Operator Name: CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | |
Well Pad ID: 151698 | |
Farm/Lease Name: REYNEN J 3 | |
License Status: | |
Spud Date: | |
Permit Date: 2014-08-18 | |
Well Type: GAS | |
Unconventional Well: Y | |
Configuration: Horizontal Well | |
Conservation: No | |
Latitude: 41.780131 | |
Longitude: -75.761892 |
Date | Event |
---|---|
2014-08-18 | New Permit Application |
2014-12-29 | Performed Spud Operation |
2015-01-26 | Drilling Completion |
2015-05-10 | Perforation |
2015-08-27 | Performed Stimulation |
2015-12-04 | DEVIATED |
For data sources see[4]
Job Number | Job Start Date | Job End Date | True Vertical Depth (ft) | Total Water Volume (gal) | Total Non-Water Volume (gal) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2015-08-26 | 2015-09-30 | 6,935 | 10,789,000 | 0 |
Job Number | Trade Name | Supplier | Purpose | Ingredient Name | CAS Number | Additive Percentage by Mass | Job Percentage by Mass | Mass Used (lb) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Plexslick 957 | Chemplex | Friction Reducer | Ammonium Chloride | 12125-02-9 | 5 | 0.0043014 | 4394.03 |
Poly (acrylamide-co-acrylic acid), partial sodium salt | 62649-23-4 | 35 | 0.0301098 | 30758.2 | ||||
Paraffinic, Naphtehenic Solvent | 64742-47-8 | 30 | 0.0258084 | 26364.2 | ||||
Nonionic Surfactants | Proprietary | 1.5 | 0.00129042 | 1318.21 | ||||
Sand | TSS | Proppant | Silica Substrate | 14808-60-7 | 100 | 11.1699 | 11,410,500.0 | |
Greenhib 679 | Chemplex | Friction Reducer | Proprietary | Proprietary | 35 | 0.00868137 | 8868.33 | |
Glycerine | 56-81-5 | 20 | 0.00496078 | 5067.62 | ||||
Water | Operator | Carrier/Base Fluid | Water | 7732-18-5 | 100 | 88.424 | 90,328,300.0 | |
Plexcide 15G | Chemplex | Biocide | Ethanol | 64-17-5 | 3 | 0.00067265 | 687.136 | |
Glutaraldehyde | 111-30-8 | 14 | 0.00313903 | 3206.63 | ||||
Didecyl Dimethyl Ammonium Chloride | 7173-51-5 | 3 | 0.00067265 | 687.136 | ||||
Alkyl Dimethyl Benzyl Ammonium Chloride | 68424-85-1 | 3 | 0.00067265 | 687.136 | ||||
15% HCL | Reagent | Acidizing | Hydrochloric Acid | 7647-01-0 | 15 | 0.0406452 | 41520.5 | |
Chemplex 4-N-1 | Chemplex | Combination/Iron Control | Methyl Alcohol | 67-56-1 | 10 | 0.000180814 | 184.708 | |
Alcohol Ethoxylate Surfactants | Proprietary | 2 | 0.00003616 | 36.942 | ||||
Diethanolamine | 111-42-2 | 2 | 0.00003616 | 36.942 | ||||
thiourea-formaldehyde copolymer | 68527-49-1 | 2 | 0.00003616 | 36.942 | ||||
Cocamide Diethanolamine Salt | 68603-42-9 | 2 | 0.00003616 | 36.942 | ||||
Acetic Acid | 64-19-7 | 85 | 0.00153692 | 1570.02 | ||||
Propargyl Alcohol | 107-19-7 | 1 | 0.00001808 | 18.471 | ||||
2-Ethylhexanol | 104-76-7 | 10 | 0.000180814 | 184.708 | ||||
n-olefins | Proprietary | 1 | 0.00001808 | 18.471 |
For data sources see[5]
Stimulation Date | Phase Number | Chemical Agent | Volume (gal) | Treating Pressure (psi) | Breakdown Pressure (psi) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015-08-27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
For data sources see[6]
Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Gas Production Days | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Oil Production Days | Water Quantity (bbl) | Water Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2015 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | 924,379.21 | 55 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2016 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | 5,586,448.75 | 366 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2017 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | 2,599,644.04 | 307 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2019 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | 348,350.00 | 309 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
For data sources see[7]
Period | Operator | Waste Type | Quantity | Disposal Method | Waste Facility ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Drilling Fluid Waste | 167.00 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NC018 |
2015 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Fracing Fluid Waste | 12,315.57 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NE002 |
2015 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 3,173.29 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NE002 |
2015 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Fracing Fluid Waste | 53.99 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NE001 |
2015 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Drilling Fluid Waste | 106.67 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR119 |
2015 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Drill Cuttings | 1,335.71 Tons | LANDFILL | 101247 |
2016 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 31.81 Bbl | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | WMGR123NE004 |
2016 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Soil Contaminated by Oil | 22.91 Tons | LANDFILL | THR029 |
2016 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Synthetic Liner Materials | 5.72 Tons | LANDFILL | 101247 |
2016 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Waste Water Treatment Sludge | 2.32 Tons | LANDFILL | 301358 |
2016 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 2,820.11 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NE002 |
2016 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Soil Contaminated by Oil & Gas Related Spills | 22.91 Tons | LANDFILL | THR029 |
2016 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 814.05 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NE002 |
2017 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 542.40 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NE002 |
2017 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 385.19 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NC018 |
2017 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 265.69 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NE004 |
2017 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Waste Water Treatment Sludge | 2.01 Tons | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
2018 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 309.04 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NE002 |
2018 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 133.52 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NE004 |
2018 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 21.36 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NC018 |
2019 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Synthetic Liner Materials | 45.70 Tons | LANDFILL | 101247 |
2019 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 534.04 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NE002 |
2019 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 1,918.98 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NE004 |
2019 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Waste Water Treatment Sludge | 9.31 Tons | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) |
For data sources see[8]
Inspection ID | Inspection Category | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2331299 | Primary Facility | 2014-12-23 | Preoperation Inspection | No Violations Noted | On 12/23/14, the Department was on site at the COG Reynen J. Well Site and Tank Pad to conduct a Preoperational Inspection. The well permit that has been issued for this site is the Reynen J 3H (115-21849). All perimeter BMP’s in place to include red lined additions. E & S inspections up-to-date. No violations noted. |
2339751 | Primary Facility | 2015-01-28 | Drilling/Alteration | No Violations Noted | |
2368776 | Primary Facility | 2015-05-11 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | Cabot and the township agreed to conduct dust control operations on the township road, Beaver Meadow Road, in front of the complainant’s. Cabot stated that they would handle dust suppression on their access road. The Department arrived on-site and observed the township applying calcium chloride to the township road. Dust suppression activities had not occurred on the access road yet. Dust was observed leaving the access road during the inspection. Left site. The Department contacted the complainant later in the day who stated that he was pleased with actions taken by all parties. No further action will be taken by the Department at this time. |
2428324 | Primary Facility | 2015-11-24 | Incident- Response to Accident or Event | No Violations Noted | Steve Watson, Environmental Health and Safety Specialist of Cabot Oil and Gas contacted me at 12:37 PM on 11/23/15 to report a spill of (68) gallons of production fluid that occurred around 10:30 PM on 11/22/15. Mr. Watson stated that sand washed out of a ball valve on a dump line due to mechanical failure releasing production fluid out of the J Reynen 6H Gas Production Unit onto the concrete containment for the GPU and eventually to the pad surface below the GPU. Apparently the failure of the valve immediately created a flash fire on this GPU. Mr. Watson claimed he was not made aware of the spill on 11/22/15. He investigated the incident during the morning hours on 11/23/15. A truck driver discovered the fire while on-site in the process of unloading production fluid from the production fluid tanks. The driver reported the fire to Cabot upon discovery. The GPU was significantly damaged from the fire. There is staining observed on the concrete containment and a small amount of fluid pooled on the backside of the GPU unit. |
2476525 | Primary Facility | 2016-04-20 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
2486930 | Primary Facility | 2016-05-23 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
2502667 | Primary Facility | 2016-07-18 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
2582547 | Primary Facility | 2017-04-12 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection, arrived on site at 12:55p.m.
The cellar was full of water with no bubbling noticed. The (20x13) annulus vent pipe was open and venting into a small plastic tank, the (13x9) annulus vent pipe was open and venting into a small plastic tank, the (9x5) annulus vent pipe was open and venting into a small plastic tank. There was 538psi on the production casing. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. I left the site at 13:30p.m. |
2612713 | Primary Facility | 2017-07-05 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection, arrived on site at 11:50a.m.
The cellar was full of water with no bubbling noticed. The (20x13) annulus vent pipe was open and venting into a small plastic tank, the (13x9) annulus vent pipe was open and venting into a small plastic tank, the (9x5) annulus vent pipe was open and venting into a small plastic tank. All the annulus vent pipes were connected to one pipe going into the same tank. There was 491psi on the production casing. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. I left the site at 12:25p.m. |
2693632 | Primary Facility | 2018-02-09 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | Today's inspection was conducted as a routine inspection. No E&S issues noted during the inspection. Baker Hughes on-site getting set up to log wells. No violations noted. |
2716041 | Primary Facility | 2018-04-02 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | Today's inspection was conducted as a complaint inspection. The complaint is that stormwater runoff coming off the site is impacting the complainant's pond. This inspection found that stormwater runoff from the site is not impacting the complainants pond. However, photos 1 thru 5 show that the entrance of the access road is overwhelmed by mud from the degradation of the access road due to the heavy truck traffic for the fracking operations. Sediment has buried silt sock, pushed silt sock, overtopped the silt sock, and gone underneath the silt sock. A plume of sediment was found off the ROW by approximately 50'. Photo 6 shows the cross culvert entrance prior to the tank pad access road buried under mud. Photo 7 shows the location of a small spill that occurred over the weekend on the tank pad. The spill was from a hydraulic hose leak and was called into the Department as being around 10 gallons. Brody Webster, Cabot EH&S Specialist called this morning and revised the volume to 2.5 gallons, the amount |
2719718 | Primary Facility | 2018-04-02 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | Today's inspection was conducted as a complaint inspection. The complaint is that stormwater runoff coming off the site is impacting the complainant's pond. This inspection found that stormwater runoff from the site is not impacting the complainants pond. However, photos 1 thru 5 show that the entrance of the access road is overwhelmed by mud from the degradation of the access road due to the heavy truck traffic for the fracking operations. Sediment has buried silt sock, pushed silt sock, overtopped the silt sock, and gone underneath the silt sock. A plume of sediment was found off the ROW by approximately 50'. Photo 6 shows the cross culvert entrance prior to the tank pad access road buried under mud. Photo 7 shows the location of a small spill that occurred over the weekend on the tank pad. The spill was from a hydraulic hose leak and was called into the Department as being around 10 gallons. Brody Webster, Cabot EH&S Specialist called this morning and revised the volume to 2.5 gallons, the amount |
2722545 | Primary Facility | 2018-04-20 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | On 4/19/18, Steve Catalfamo, Cabot EH&S Specialist contacted the Department after hours to report the release of hydraulic fluid to the tank pad of the Reynen J P1 Well Site. The spill occurred while a water truck was delivering fresh water and a hydraulic hose ruptured. At the time of the release, Cabot estimated that approximatey 20 gallons was released to the pad surface with approximately 5 gallons recovered immediately. Today's inspection was conducted with Steve Catalfamo. Resource Environmental was on-site during the inspection, and was conducting final soil sample tests to confirm that the remediation was successful. The Department finds that this spill has been immediately corrected. Next, photos 3 thru 5 show that the violations documented in inspection record # 2713352 have been corrected. The inspection also revealed that the violations related to the cross culvert located near the tank pad have also been corrected. Photo # 6 shows a ditch along the lower section of the access road that |
2744543 | Primary Facility | 2018-06-22 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection.
There were 7 wells on site, the 3H, 5H and 6H wells were existing wells and the 1H, 4H, 7H and 8H wells were recently completed and put in production. The wells tags for the existing wells weren't put back on the wells. The well tags on the 4H, 7H and 8H wells were correct. The well tag on the 1H had a permit number (115-21856) for a well that was reported never drilled, the correct permit number is (115-22357). I contacted Steve Watson of Cabot Oil & Gas to have the well tags for the three existing wells put back on and change the permit number on the 1H well tag. I also asked that Cabot send me a picture when the corrections are made. The 3H well was temporarily shut in. Ben Burridge (Cabot well tender) was flowing fluid off the 6H well because it was loaded up from the recent frac. The 5H well was back in production. The (20x13), (13x9) and (9x5) annuli vent pipes were connected together on the 3H, 5H and 7H wells and going to the same poly vent tank. The (20x13), (13x9) and (9x5) a |
2754596 | Primary Facility | 2018-07-16 | Incident- Response to Accident or Event | No Violations Noted | Frank Hoehle, DEP O&G WQS and I arrived at the site at 11:31 in response to a reported spill of (13) gallons of flowback fluid to the pad surface. The weather conditions are partly cloudy skies, hot and humid, with temperatures in the mid to upper 80's. Brody Webster and Steve Watson of Cabot Oil and Gas were at the site in the process of assessing the spill incident and overseeing the delineation of the extent of the impact. Resource Environmental is the subcontractor conducting field soil conductivity screening in order to delineate the extent of the contamination. GasSearch Drilling Services (GDS) is the subcontractor remediating the impacted area via an excavator. Mr. Watson and Mr. Webster provided the Department the following information in reference to the spill incident. "The spill was discovered on Saturday, 7/14/18, at 8:30 AM by a Cabot well tender. After completing the process of unloading flowback fluid from the gas buster frac tank, the driver of a residual waste vacuum truck disconnecte |
2754872 | Primary Facility | 2018-07-18 | Follow-up Inspection | No Violations Noted | The Department, Casey Baldwin, Frank Hoehle, DEP O&G WQS's and I arrived at the site at 13:23 to conduct a follow-up inspection. The weather conditions are partly cloudy skies with a light breeze and temperatures in the low to mid 70's. Brody Webster, Manager of Safety and Environment of Cabot Oil and Gas contacted me at 10:30 AM on 7/18/18 providing an updated status of the remediation and assessment of the spill incident. Mr. Webster stated the following during the phone conversation. "We discovered the area of the pad surface has been impacted where the gas buster tank and containment for the tank were formerly located, after removing the tank and containment. We are unable to quantify the volume of fluid spilled to the pad surface. Therefore, we will collect background and attainment samples consistent with Act 2 standards and seek Act 2 relief of liability."
Shortly after we arrived and had observed the area remediated on the pad surface associated with the spill had been covered with a liner ma |
2763205 | Primary Facility | 2018-08-09 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | I inspected the Reynen pad and access road. The wells associated with this pad were all properly labeled.
The cut and fill slopes were all well vegetated and stable at the time of inspection. The access road has ben having runoff issues due to torrential rains but Cabot has been working with the Department and the landowner to address the roadside ditch outside the LOD. There were no violations. |
2770166 | Primary Facility | 2018-08-31 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | I inspected the Reynen pad as a follow up to a complaint received that the access road roadside ditch washed out and deposited sediment near a swale entrance and was causing water problems for a home downgradient of the road. The ditch was not within the LOD for the well pad however Cabot worked with the Department and the Landowner to repair the situation. The ditch was regraded and reworked following torrential downpours, and large stone lining the ditch was added. Accumulated sediment which had previously washed out a field entrance and filled a culvert pipe was removed and a larger culvert pipe was added. The field entrance was regraded and the swale was restored to working condition. The access road ditch is now in excellent condition.
The well pad surface had a plastic covering in an area of a previous release. The cut and fill slopes were well vegetated and the access road was regraded and stable. There were no erosional issues apparent at the time of inspection. There were no violations note |
2848940 | Primary Facility | 2019-03-06 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection.
The well was in production. The cellar was empty and there was no gas detected. The (20x13), (13x9) and (9x5) annuli vent pipes were connected together and going to the same poly vent tank. There was no gas detected at the poly vent tank with a MSA Altair 5X multi gas detector that was calibrated on 3/4/19. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted. |
For data sources see[9]