X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

37-115-21916

Well Details

Well ID: 37-115-21916
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Pennsylvania
County: Susquehanna
Municipality: Bridgewater Township
Operator Name: CABOT OIL & GAS CORP
Well Pad ID: 152065
Farm/Lease Name: WRIGHT W 2
License Status: Active
Spud Date: 2015-02-16
Permit Date: 2014-11-19
Well Type: GAS
Unconventional Well: Y
Configuration: Horizontal Well
Conservation: No
Latitude: 41.788283
Longitude: -75.912636

For data sources see[1][2][3]

Well History

Date Event
2014-11-19 New Permit Application
2015-02-16 Performed Spud Operation
2015-03-20 Drilling Completion
2016-08-13 Perforation
2016-10-29 Perforation
2016-10-29 Performed Stage 1 of Stimulation
2016-10-30 Perforation
2016-10-30 Performed Stage 2 of Stimulation
2016-10-31 Perforation
2016-10-31 Performed Stage 3 of Stimulation
2016-11-01 Perforation
2016-11-01 Performed Stage 4 of Stimulation
2016-11-01 Performed Stage 5 of Stimulation
2016-11-02 Perforation
2016-11-02 Performed Stage 6 of Stimulation
2016-11-03 Perforation
2016-11-03 Performed Stage 7 of Stimulation
2016-11-04 Perforation
2016-11-04 Performed Stage 8 of Stimulation
2016-11-05 Perforation
2016-11-05 Performed Stage 10 of Stimulation
2016-11-05 Performed Stage 9 of Stimulation
2016-11-06 Perforation
2016-11-06 Performed Stage 11 of Stimulation
2016-11-07 Perforation
2016-11-07 Performed Stage 12 of Stimulation
2016-11-08 Perforation
2016-11-08 Performed Stage 13 of Stimulation
2016-11-08 Performed Stage 14 of Stimulation
2016-11-09 Perforation
2016-11-09 Performed Stage 15 of Stimulation
2016-11-09 Performed Stage 16 of Stimulation
2016-11-10 Perforation
2016-11-10 Performed Stage 17 of Stimulation
2016-11-10 Performed Stage 18 of Stimulation
2016-11-11 Perforation
2016-11-11 Performed Stage 19 of Stimulation
2016-11-11 Performed Stage 20 of Stimulation
2016-11-12 Perforation
2016-11-12 Performed Stage 21 of Stimulation
2016-11-12 Performed Stage 22 of Stimulation
2016-11-13 Perforation
2016-11-13 Performed Stage 23 of Stimulation
2016-11-13 Performed Stage 24 of Stimulation
2016-11-13 Performed Stage 25 of Stimulation
2016-11-14 Perforation
2016-11-14 Performed Stage 26 of Stimulation
2016-11-14 Performed Stage 27 of Stimulation
2016-11-14 Performed Stage 28 of Stimulation
2017-01-31 Deviated

For data sources see[4]

Fracking Activities

Fracking Jobs

Job Number Job Start Date Job End Date True Vertical Depth (ft) Total Water Volume (gal) Total Non-Water Volume (gal)
1 2016-10-28 2016-11-13 6,612 9,978,020 0

Fluid Composition Data

Job Number Trade Name Supplier Purpose Ingredient Name CAS Number Additive Percentage by Mass Job Percentage by Mass Mass Used (lb)
1 Water Operator Carrier Water 7732-18-5 100 88.3767 83,194,800.0
Scaletrol 720 Baker Hughes Scale Inhibitor MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.00300356 28,274,500.0
Scaletrol 5279 Baker Hughes Scale Inhibitor MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.00604462 3266.67
Alpha 1427 Baker Hughes Biocide MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.0160679 10804.1
Ferrotrol 300L Baker Hughes Iron Control MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.0011651 1096.79
HCl, 10.1 - 15% Baker Hughes Acidizing MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.276096 259907
Sand, White Baker Hughes Proppant MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 11.3065 10,643,500.0
Other Chemical(s) Baker Hughes See Trade Name(s) List Water 7732-18-5 85 0.25372 238843
CI-14 Baker Hughes Corrosion Inhibitor MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.00004465 42.0332
Polyoxyalkylenes 68951-67-7 30 0.000133954 126.1
Citric Acid 77-92-9 60 0.0011651 1096.79
Ethylene Glycol 107-21-1 40 0.00565905 5327.24
Olefin 64743-02-8 5 0.00002233 21.0166
Phosphonate Salt Trade Secret 5 0.000385571 362.963
Ethanol 64-17-5 5 0.00114771 1080.41
Modified Thiourea Polymer 68527-49-1 7 0.00003126 29.4232
Didecyl Dimethyl Ammonium Chloride 7173-51-5 10 0.00229541 2160.82
Fatty Acids 61790-12-3 10 0.00004465 42.0332
Propargyl Alcohol 107-19-7 5 0.00002233 21.0166
Sodium Chloride 7647-14-5 1 0.00008582 80.7843
Quaternary Ammonium Compound 68424-85-1 5 0.00114771 1080.41
Potassium Chloride 7447-40-7 1 0.00008582 80.7843
Modified carboxylic acid salt Trade Secret 17 0 0
Hydrochloric Acid 7647-01-0 15 0.0414188 38990.2
Formaldehyde 50-00-0 1 0.00000447 4.20332
Calcium Chloride 10043-52-4 5 0.000429081 403.922
Crystalline Silica (Quartz) 14808-60-7 100 11.3065 10,643,500.0
Methanol 67-56-1 100 0.000446513 420.332
Glutaraldehyde 111-30-8 30 0.00688624 6482.47

For data sources see[5]

Stimulation Data

Stimulation Date Phase Number Chemical Agent Volume (gal) Treating Pressure (psi) Breakdown Pressure (psi)
2016-10-29 1 SAND, WHITE 235,524 8,133 7,024
2016-10-30 2 SAND, WHITE 235,524 7,974 7,922
2016-10-31 3 SAND, WHITE 235,524 8,164 7,480
2016-11-01 4 SAND, WHITE 235,524 8,192 7,790
2016-11-01 5 SAND, WHITE 235,524 7,944 7,179
2016-11-02 6 SAND, WHITE 235,524 7,640 5,770
2016-11-03 7 SAND, WHITE 235,524 7,614 5,942
2016-11-04 8 SAND, WHITE 235,524 7,559 6,926
2016-11-05 9 SAND, WHITE 235,524 7,511 7,725
2016-11-05 10 SAND, WHITE 235,524 7,520 7,598
2016-11-06 11 SAND, WHITE 235,524 7,404 6,731
2016-11-07 12 SAND, WHITE 235,524 7,328 6,505
2016-11-08 13 SAND, WHITE 235,524 7,282 6,650
2016-11-08 14 SAND, WHITE 235,524 7,227 6,897
2016-11-09 15 SAND, WHITE 235,524 7,088 6,477
2016-11-09 16 SAND, WHITE 235,524 7,098 7,071
2016-11-10 17 SAND, WHITE 235,524 6,974 5,902
2016-11-10 18 SAND, WHITE 235,524 6,459 7,443
2016-11-11 19 SAND, WHITE 235,524 5,998 5,628
2016-11-11 20 SAND, WHITE 235,524 6,027 5,743
2016-11-12 21 SAND, WHITE 235,524 6,065 6,197
2016-11-12 22 SAND, WHITE 235,524 6,061 6,236
2016-11-13 23 SAND, WHITE 235,524 6,340 5,706
2016-11-13 24 SAND, WHITE 235,524 6,548 6,766
2016-11-13 25 SAND, WHITE 235,524 6,578 7,395
2016-11-14 26 SAND, WHITE 235,524 6,347 6,111
2016-11-14 27 SAND, WHITE 235,524 6,333 7,236
2016-11-14 28 SAND, WHITE 235,524 6,296 6,530

For data sources see[6]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Gas Production Days Oil Quantity (bbl) Oil Production Days Water Quantity (bbl) Water Production Days
2015 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
2016 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP 831,330.38 41 0.00 0 0.00 0
2017 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP 5,713,140.18 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
2018 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP 2,559,595.00 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
2019 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP 1,685,260.00 365 0.00 0 0.00 0

For data sources see[7]

Waste Data

Period Operator Waste Type Quantity Disposal Method Waste Facility ID
2015 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Drilling Fluid Waste 36.67 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) WMGR123NC018
2015 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Drill Cuttings 1,535.40 Tons LANDFILL 101247
2016 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Synthetic Liner Materials 48.83 Tons LANDFILL 101247
2016 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Fracturing Fluid Waste 15,075.21 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NE002
2016 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 474.12 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NE002
2016 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Fracturing Fluid Waste 125.96 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NC018
2016 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Other Oil & Gas Wastes 0.03 Tons RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY 301333
2017 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Waste Water Treatment Sludge 16.95 Tons LANDFILL THR029
2017 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Synthetic Liner Materials 7.29 Tons LANDFILL 101247
2017 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 383.81 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NC018
2017 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 48.70 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NE004
2017 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 1,605.85 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NE002
2018 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Synthetic Liner Materials 2.49 Tons LANDFILL 101247
2018 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 533.34 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NE002
2018 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 118.23 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NC018
2019 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 386.60 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NE002

For data sources see[8]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Category Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
2344120 Primary Facility 2015-02-13 Preoperation Inspection No Violations Noted
2347527 Primary Facility 2015-02-24 Drilling/Alteration No Violations Noted
2535860 Primary Facility 2016-11-10 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted At time of inspection, arrived on site at 9:10a.m., Baker Hughes was on site and fracking the 1H, 2H, and 6H. I met with company man Wayne Wilridge (Operations Manager). They were fracking stage 19 out of 28 on the 2H and running a plug and perforation in the 6H. The 1H was completed with 21 stages and 27 stages were completed out of 32 on the 6H. The water was being hauled to tanks on the lower pad and pumped to the well pad through a plastic line. The tanks were on containment and it was in good condition. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed.

I left the site at 10:40a.m.

2552780 Primary Facility 2017-01-17 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted At time of inspection, arrived on site at 11:20a.m., the well was recently completed and is in production. The well tag was on the well and correct. The cellar had water and ice at the bottom with no bubbling noticed, the (20x13) vent pipe was open and venting into a small plastic tank, the (13x9) vent pipe was open and venting into a small plastic tank, the (9x5) vent pipe was open and venting into a small plastic tank. There was 760psi on the production casing. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed.

I left the site at 11:55a.m.

2557870 Primary Facility 2017-01-26 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted The Department was on site to conduct a Routine Complete Inspection of the Wright well site (ESX13-115-0131). The wells associated with this site are as follows:

115-21915 115-21916 115-21919 115-21920

The Department had previously been on site on January 18, 2017 and there was debris on site at that time. There were sandbags littering the site and there was very little growth on the fill slope of the tank pad (Photo 1). There apparently had been recent excavation work done at that time near the road entrance, and there was an expanse of unmulched/unstabilized ground (Photo 2). At the time, the Department decided to wait and see if the situation was just in limbo due to work having been completed for the day or weather conditions. On January 26, 2016, the Department returned to the site and found the previously noted conditions were the same. The exposed ground was not stabilized nor was any debris removed from the pad site. The fill slope was also not stabilized. It would be recommended that the fi

2600061 Primary Facility 2017-05-16 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted The Department was on site to conduct a Routine Complete Inspection. Upon my arrival I reviewed the E&S Inspection Log to find that the most recent inspection has been conducted on 5/15/17 by Sam Wiernuscz and it was a post precipitation inspection.

During the course of the Department's inspection, I conducted a visual inspection of the wells. I found bubbles forming at the unions on the bull plug, with a gauge, on the production tree of the 2H and 6H wells.

2627475 Primary Facility 2017-08-21 Follow-up Inspection No Violations Noted I received an email from Mike Pirner of Cabot letting me know most repairs to the Wright well site were now completed. Upon inspection of the site I found that they were indeed completed and stability had been restored to the site previously affected by torrential rains. The entire area was now reseeded, limed, fertilized and mulched. The slopes were starting to green up where erosion blanket had been placed and the sediment basins were reshaped, reseeded and mulched.

There were no violations noted.

2641094 Primary Facility 2017-09-28 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted At time of inspection.

The well was in production. All the annulus vent pipes were connected together and going to the same tank. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted.

2651588 Primary Facility 2017-10-06 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted Scott Rockwell (TEC) conducted the most recent inspection on 10/6/2017.
2705524 Primary Facility 2018-03-13 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted I inspected the Wright well pad on March 13, 2017. The weather was snowy and damp. The access road was muddy but there was a sweeper unit on hand. The cut and fill slopes were stable and the pad surface was muddy but stable. There were some Keane trucks staged on site.

The wells associated with this site are as follows: 115-21915 115-21916 115-21920 are all active 115-21919 plugged.

The wells were all properly labeled. There were no erosional issues apparent.

There were no violations

2747108 Primary Facility 2018-06-29 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted At time of inspection.

The well was in production. The cellar was full of water and there was no bubbling noticed. The (20x13), (13x9) and (9x5) annuli vent pipes were connected together and going to the same poly vent tank. There was no gas detected at the poly vent tank. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted.

2804121 Primary Facility 2018-11-15 Site Restoration No Violations Noted I performed a RTNC inspection of the Wright well pad in the course of performing a Notice of Termination inspection for the Wright well connect project.
    The weather was cloudy and the temperature was about 27 degrees F.  Snow was imminent. 
    The access road was stable and solid as was the pad surface (Photo 1).  There were no erosional issues of note on these areas.  Active agriculture was observed in the vicinity of the wellpad, with no adverse impacts noted.
    The slopes and area surrounding the wellpad was well vegetated and the vegetation was healthy and abundant. There were no areas of instability noted (Photos 2 and 3).  Previously during very wet conditions there had been some erosional issues at the site but the areas affected have long since been corrected and were all growing well and stable.
    There were no adverse erosional issues noted at the time of inspection.
    The wells were all correctly labeled (Photo 4).
    There were no violations observed.
2846502 Primary Facility 2019-02-28 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted At time of inspection.

The well was in production. The cellar was empty and there was no gas detected. The (20x13), (13x9) and (9x5) annuli vent pipes were connected together and going to the same poly vent tank. There was no gas detected at the poly vent tank with a MSA Altair 5X multi gas detector that was calibrated on 2/5/19. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted.

For data sources see[9]

References