If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
| Well ID: 37-115-22008 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":41.969297,"lon":-75.622211,"icon":""}]} |
| Country: United States | |
| State: Pennsylvania | |
| County: Susquehanna | |
| Municipality: Oakland Township | |
| Operator Name: SWN PROD CO LLC | |
| Well Pad ID: 151947 | |
| Farm/Lease Name: WALKER DIEHL NORTH 1H | |
| License Status: | |
| Spud Date: | |
| Permit Date: 2015-06-17 | |
| Well Type: GAS | |
| Unconventional Well: Y | |
| Configuration: Horizontal Well | |
| Conservation: No | |
| Latitude: 41.969297 | |
| Longitude: -75.622211 |
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2015-06-17 | New Permit Application |
| 2015-08-15 | Performed Spud Operation |
| 2015-09-23 | Drilling Completion |
| 2015-10-27 | Perforation |
| 2015-10-27 | Performed Stimulation |
| 2016-01-20 | DEVIATED |
For data sources see[4]
| Job Number | Job Start Date | Job End Date | True Vertical Depth (ft) | Total Water Volume (gal) | Total Non-Water Volume (gal) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015-10-27 | 2015-11-01 | 6,029 | 7,242,060 | 0 |
| Job Number | Trade Name | Supplier | Purpose | Ingredient Name | CAS Number | Additive Percentage by Mass | Job Percentage by Mass | Mass Used (lb) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CI-39 | Baker Hughes | Corrosion Inhibitor | MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients Listed Below | N/A | 0 | 0.0015414 | 1150 |
| Sand, White, 30/50 | Baker Hughes | Proppant | MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients Listed Below | N/A | 0 | 9.16302 | 6,836,460.0 | |
| Alpha 1427 | Baker Hughes | Biocide | MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients Listed Below | N/A | 0 | 0.0123142 | 9187.5 | |
| Sand, White, 100 mesh | Baker Hughes | Proppant | MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients Listed Below | N/A | 0 | 9.06091 | 6,760,280.0 | |
| Ingredients in Additive(s) (MSDS and non-MSDS) | Baker Hughes | See Trade Name(s) List | Isopropanol | 67-63-0 | 5 | 0.00007700 | 57.5 | |
| Potassium Acetate | 127-08-2 | 0.5 | 0.00000770 | 5.75 | ||||
| Tar Bases, Quinoline Derivs., Benzyl Chloride-Quaternized | 72480-70-7 | 30 | 0.0004622 | 345 | ||||
| 1-Propanesulfonic acid, 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1-yl)amino]-, polymer with 2-propenamide, sodium salt |
83446-68-8 | 60 | 0.036177 | 27004.3 | ||||
| Ethanol | 64-17-5 | 5 | 0.0006154 | 459.375 | ||||
| Oxyalkylated Fatty Acid | 61791-002 | 40 | 0.0006163 | 460 | ||||
| Didecyl Dimethyl Ammonium Chloride | 7173-51-5 | 10 | 0.0012308 | 918.75 | ||||
| Calcium Chloride | 10043-52-4 | 5 | 0.0007138 | 532.81 | ||||
| Polyaklylene | 7756-94-7 | 1 | 0.00001540 | 11.5 | ||||
| Hydrotreated Light Distillate | 64742-47-8 | 30 | 0.0180885 | 13502.2 | ||||
| Citric Acid | 77-92-9 | 60 | 0.003116 | 2325.95 | ||||
| Glutaraldehyde | 111-30-8 | 30 | 0.0036925 | 2756.25 | ||||
| Potassium Chloride | 7447-40-7 | 1 | 0.0001428 | 106.562 | ||||
| Sorbitan, mono-(9Z)-9-octadecenoate | 1338-43-8 | 5 | 0.0030147 | 2250.36 | ||||
| Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate | 9005-65-6 | 5 | 0.0030147 | 2250.36 | ||||
| Hydrochloric Acid | 7647-01-0 | 15 | 0.11248 | 83960.5 | ||||
| Water | 7732-18-5 | 85 | 0.690805 | 515651 | ||||
| Sodium Chloride | 7647-14-5 | 5 | 0.0031575 | 2356.92 | ||||
| Potassium Iodide | 7681-11-0 | 2 | 0.00003080 | 23 | ||||
| Formic Acid | 64-18-6 | 30 | 0.0004622 | 345 | ||||
| Ethylene Glycol | 107-21-1 | 45 | 0.0064241 | 4795.29 | ||||
| Crystalline Silica (Quartz) | 14808-60-7 | 100 | 18.2152 | 13,596,700.0 | ||||
| Aldehyde | 104-55-2 | 30 | 0.0004622 | 345 | ||||
| Sulfurized polyolefin | 68037-13-8 | 5 | 0.00007700 | 57.5 | ||||
| Oxyalkylated alcohol | 78330-21-9 | 5 | 0.0030147 | 2250.36 | ||||
| 2-Propenoic, Polymer with Sodium Phosphinate, Sodium Salt | 71050-62-9 | 20 | 0.0028552 | 2131.24 | ||||
| Quaternary Ammonium Compound | 68424-85-1 | 5 | 0.0006924 | 516.875 | ||||
| Ferrotrol 300L | Baker Hughes | Iron Control | MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients Listed Below | N/A | 0 | 0.0051958 | 3876.58 | |
| Scaletrol 720 | Baker Hughes | Scale Inhibitor | MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients Listed Below | N/A | 0 | 0.0142826 | 10656.2 | |
| Water | Operator | Carrier | Water | 7732-18-5 | 100 | 80.8934 | 60,382,800.0 | |
| HCl, 10.1 - 15% | Baker Hughes | Acidizing | MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients Listed Below | N/A | 0 | 0.750224 | 559737 | |
| MaxPerm-20A, 265 gallon tote | Baker Hughes | Friction Reducer | MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients Listed Below | N/A | 0 | 0.0603239 | 45007.2 |
For data sources see[5]
| Stimulation Date | Phase Number | Chemical Agent | Volume (gal) | Treating Pressure (psi) | Breakdown Pressure (psi) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-10-27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
For data sources see[6]
| Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Gas Production Days | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Oil Production Days | Water Quantity (bbl) | Water Production Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | SWN PROD CO LLC | 225,029.00 | 38 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2016 | SWN PROD CO LLC | 1,341,440.00 | 364 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2017 | SWN PROD CO LLC | 833,423.00 | 362 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2018 | SWN PROD CO LLC | 646,153.00 | 363 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2019 | SWN PROD CO LLC | 547,594.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
For data sources see[7]
| Period | Operator | Waste Type | Quantity | Disposal Method | Waste Facility ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Fracing Fluid Waste | 102.50 Bbl | LANDFILL | THR029 |
| 2015 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Drill Cuttings | 1,195.00 Tons | LANDFILL | 101247 |
| 2015 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 18,275.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2016 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 60.50 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2016 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 7,901.50 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2016 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Fracturing Fluid Waste | 20.00 Tons | LANDFILL | THR029 |
| 2017 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 5,040.50 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 95-16-65420-013 |
| 2017 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 74.00 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 95-16-65420-013 |
| 2017 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 695.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2018 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 1,551.50 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 95-16-65420-013 |
| 2018 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 330.00 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
| 2018 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 165.00 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 95-16-65420-013 |
| 2018 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 445.50 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 826342 |
| 2019 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 232.00 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 826342 |
| 2019 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 14.25 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 95-16-65420-013 |
| 2019 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 1,018.00 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 95-16-65420-013 |
For data sources see[8]
| Inspection ID | Inspection Category | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2397648 | Primary Facility | 2015-08-11 | Preoperation Inspection | No Violations Noted | On 8/11/15, the Department was on site at the SWN NR 19 Walker Diehl Well Pad to conduct a Preoperational Inspection. Inspection conducted with Rich Gulyas, SWN Construction Foreman, Andy Breese, SWN Construction Foreman, and Ryan Klemish, Regulatory Analyst. The well permits that have been issued for this pad are the Walker Diehl N 1H (115-22008), the N 4H (115-21882), and the S 5H (115-22009). All perimeter BMP’s in place to include red lined additions. Pad is 100% complete. No violations noted. |
| 2400973 | Primary Facility | 2015-08-21 | Drilling/Alteration | No Violations Noted | |
| 2401614 | Primary Facility | 2015-08-25 | Drilling/Alteration | No Violations Noted | |
| 2409339 | Primary Facility | 2015-09-22 | Drilling/Alteration | No Violations Noted | |
| 2412663 | Primary Facility | 2015-09-14 | Drilling/Alteration | No Violations Noted | Heavy equipment on location mobilizing rig. SDC 44 to resume drilling on the Walker Diehl North 1H at approx 2000 hours on 9/15 |
| 2446902 | Primary Facility | 2016-02-03 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 2470053 | Primary Facility | 2016-03-31 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 2474825 | Primary Facility | 2016-04-14 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 2479224 | Primary Facility | 2016-04-19 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | Department representatives Frank Hoehle, WQS and Andrea Mullen, LPG were on site on 4/19/2016 to conduct a routine complete inspection of the Walker Diehl Well Pad (ESX29-115-14-0067). The site was last inspected by the company on 4/18/2016.
The wells associated with this site are as follows: 115-22008 115-21882 115-21888 115-22009 The site had some slippage along the access road leading in near the following GPS coordinate: 41deg. 58' 15" 75deg 37' 23". (Photos 1 and 2) The site also had poor vegetative growth in the vicinity of coordinates: 41deg. 58' 13.8" 75deg. 37' 20.1". The poor vegetative growth could possibly be due to too much organic matter being incorporated into the soil from tree clearing operations, resulting in a tie up of the nitrogen necessary for proper germination. (Photos 3 and 4) The sediment trap near coordinates 41deg. 58' 12.9" 75deg. 37' 21.8" is laden with sediment, most likely due to the poor vegetative growth directly uphill from the trap. (Photo 5) If |
| 2484783 | Primary Facility | 2016-05-17 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 2491698 | Primary Facility | 2016-06-06 | Routine/Partial Inspection | No Violations Noted | The Department was on site at the Walker Diehl Well Site to conduct a Routine Partial Inspection. At the time of the inspection, the Department noted that the E&S Plan was on site and the E&S Inspection Log indicated that SRT conducted their most recent inspection on 6/6/16. The Department walked the site to verify if the recent efforts to bring the site back into compliance have worked. The Department noted a large mulch pile on the well site. Also, the site does not meet temporary stabilization requirements. During the Department’s inspection, there were large areas that had very little to no vegetation at all. The Department requests that the operator survey these areas and deploy a method of temporary stabilization consistent with your E&S Plan within 3 business days of receipt. |
| 2495480 | Primary Facility | 2016-06-23 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 2505976 | Primary Facility | 2016-07-26 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 2526635 | Primary Facility | 2016-09-26 | Follow-up Inspection | No Violations Noted |
The Department was on site to conduct a Follow-Up Inspection of the Walker Diehl Well Site. On 6/21/16 the Department received an email from Afton Sterling (Regulatory Supervisor-SWN) concerning stabilization efforts at the NR 19- Walker Diehl Well Site. The email explained that they worked on the site that day seeding, fertilizing, and applying hay/mulch and that they will be bringing an additional 10 bales of hay and two bags of fertilizer for application the following day. During this Follow-Up Inspection, it was noted that the well site appeared to meet temporary stabilization requirements. Areas that did not have vegetative growth consisted of mainly rock. There was a small area on the cut slope adjacent to the rock filter that could use some additional measures to acquire stabilization. There is still a large mulch pile on site. Lastly, the catch basin at the cross culvert outlet was full of water that was clear (not sediment laden as it was during the previous inspection). |
| 2564076 | Primary Facility | 2017-02-23 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | Site mostly snow covered. The repairs cited in a previous inspection had been addressed and are holding up well, with visible vegetation through snow cover. The cut slope of the well pad has areas of low vegetation however this seems to be due to a local lack of good topsoil and rocky conditions. The access road is well graded and had no erosion or washouts along its length. There are no apparent erosional issues currently.
There are no violations If there are any issues feel free to contact me at 570 346-5539 |
| 2570654 | Primary Facility | 2017-03-09 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection, arrived on site at 12:35p.m.
The cellar was set up with a plastic corrugated pipe around the well for inspection access; there was water above the surface casing with no bubbling noticed. The (9x5) annulus vent pipe was open and set up with a Taylor plug to check for pressure with a Crystal pressure gauge and a 1000psi pressure gauge with about 265psi on it, the valve going to the production tank was closed. There was 608psi on the production casing and 313psi on the production line. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. I left the site at 12:50p.m. |
| 2665816 | Primary Facility | 2017-11-30 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection.
The well was in production. The cellar was set up with a corrugated pipe around the well for inspection access. The (20x13) and (13x9) annuli were below the water level and there was no bubbling noticed. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted. |
| 2765665 | Primary Facility | 2018-08-21 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection.
The well was in production. The cellar was set up with a plastic corrugated pipe around the well for inspection access. There was water .5' below grade in the cellar and there was no bubbling noticed. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted. |
| 2828191 | Primary Facility | 2019-01-14 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | Today's inspection was conducted as a routine inspection. Overall the site has good stabilization. No E&S issues identified. No violations noted. |
For data sources see[9]