If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
| Well ID: 37-117-21896 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":41.651264,"lon":-77.065347,"icon":""}]} |
| Country: United States | |
| State: Pennsylvania | |
| County: Tioga | |
| Municipality: Hamilton Township | |
| Operator Name: REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | |
| Well Pad ID: 154138 | |
| Farm/Lease Name: JOHNSON (02-135-04) K | |
| License Status: Active | |
| Spud Date: 2017-04-12 | |
| Permit Date: 2017-02-01 | |
| Well Type: GAS | |
| Unconventional Well: Y | |
| Configuration: Horizontal Well | |
| Conservation: No | |
| Latitude: 41.651264 | |
| Longitude: -77.065347 |
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2017-02-01 | New Permit Application |
| 2017-04-07 | Performed Spud Operation |
| 2017-05-19 | Drilling Completion |
| 2017-09-27 | Perforation |
| 2017-10-19 | Perforation |
| 2017-10-19 | Performed Stage 1 of Stimulation |
| 2017-10-20 | Perforation |
| 2017-10-20 | Performed Stage 2 of Stimulation |
| 2017-10-20 | Performed Stage 3 of Stimulation |
| 2017-10-21 | Perforation |
| 2017-10-21 | Performed Stage 4 of Stimulation |
| 2017-10-22 | Perforation |
| 2017-10-22 | Performed Stage 5 of Stimulation |
| 2017-10-23 | Perforation |
| 2017-10-23 | Performed Stage 6 of Stimulation |
| 2017-10-23 | Performed Stage 7 of Stimulation |
| 2017-10-24 | Perforation |
| 2017-10-24 | Performed Stage 8 of Stimulation |
| 2017-10-24 | Performed Stage 9 of Stimulation |
| 2017-10-25 | Perforation |
| 2017-10-25 | Performed Stage 10 of Stimulation |
| 2017-10-26 | Perforation |
| 2017-10-26 | Performed Stage 11 of Stimulation |
| 2017-10-26 | Performed Stage 12 of Stimulation |
| 2017-10-27 | Perforation |
| 2017-10-27 | Performed Stage 13 of Stimulation |
| 2017-10-27 | Performed Stage 14 of Stimulation |
| 2017-10-29 | Perforation |
| 2017-10-29 | Performed Stage 15 of Stimulation |
| 2017-10-29 | Performed Stage 16 of Stimulation |
| 2017-10-29 | Performed Stage 17 of Stimulation |
| 2017-10-30 | Perforation |
| 2017-10-30 | Performed Stage 18 of Stimulation |
| 2018-05-23 | Deviated |
For data sources see[4]
| Stimulation Date | Phase Number | Chemical Agent | Volume (gal) | Treating Pressure (psi) | Breakdown Pressure (psi) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-10-19 | 1 | White | 0 | 9,951 | 11,442 |
| 2017-10-20 | 2 | White | 0 | 9,264 | 9,940 |
| 2017-10-20 | 3 | White | 0 | 9,586 | 10,930 |
| 2017-10-21 | 4 | White | 0 | 9,579 | 13,198 |
| 2017-10-22 | 5 | White | 0 | 9,235 | 11,009 |
| 2017-10-23 | 6 | White | 0 | 11,080 | 11,873 |
| 2017-10-23 | 7 | White | 0 | 9,831 | 10,885 |
| 2017-10-24 | 8 | White | 0 | 10,271 | 10,960 |
| 2017-10-24 | 9 | White | 0 | 10,134 | 12,879 |
| 2017-10-25 | 10 | White | 0 | 10,504 | 12,526 |
| 2017-10-26 | 11 | White | 0 | 9,618 | 11,161 |
| 2017-10-26 | 12 | White | 0 | 9,443 | 10,099 |
| 2017-10-27 | 13 | White | 0 | 9,527 | 10,823 |
| 2017-10-27 | 14 | White | 0 | 9,546 | 10,238 |
| 2017-10-29 | 15 | White | 0 | 9,791 | 10,883 |
| 2017-10-29 | 16 | White | 0 | 8,632 | 9,187 |
| 2017-10-29 | 17 | White | 0 | 9,121 | 9,697 |
| 2017-10-30 | 18 | White | 0 | 9,425 | 10,286 |
For data sources see[5]
| Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Gas Production Days | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Oil Production Days | Water Quantity (bbl) | Water Production Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | 222,500.60 | 40 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2018 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | 1,085,106.20 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2019 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | 565,371.50 | 311 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
For data sources see[6]
| Period | Operator | Waste Type | Quantity | Disposal Method | Waste Facility ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | Soil Contaminated by Oil | 0.07 Tons | LANDFILL | 8-0728-0004/013 |
| 2017 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | Drill Cuttings | 1,221.40 Tons | LANDFILL | 301358 |
| 2017 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | Synthetic Liner Materials | 22.68 Tons | LANDFILL | 8-0728-0004/013 |
| 2017 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | Soil Contaminated by Oil & Gas Related Spills | 0.07 Tons | LANDFILL | 8-0728-0004/013 |
| 2017 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | Produced Fluid | 4,462.35 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
| 2017 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | Produced Fluid | 40.04 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NC010 |
| 2017 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | Produced Fluid | 114.41 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123 |
| 2018 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 17.20 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123 |
| 2018 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | Produced Fluid | 1,565.03 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NC010 |
| 2018 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 17.86 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
| 2018 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | Produced Fluid | 3,100.03 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
| 2018 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | Synthetic Liner Materials | 1.37 Tons | LANDFILL | 8-0728-0004/013 |
| 2018 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | Produced Fluid | 216.07 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123 |
| 2018 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 39.00 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NC010 |
| 2019 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | Produced Fluid | 67.37 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123 |
| 2019 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | Produced Fluid | 17.57 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NC018 |
| 2019 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | Produced Fluid | 109.36 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NC010 |
| 2019 | REPSOL OIL & GAS USA LLC | Produced Fluid | 531.02 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) |
For data sources see[7]
| Inspection ID | Inspection Category | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2562146 | Primary Facility | 2017-02-08 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | On 2/8/17 the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) attended a preconstruction meeting for the Johnson K (02-135) well site. Repsol, Brubacher and Larson Design representatives were present.
Larson Design developed the Erosion and Sedimentation (E&S) Control plan. The site will consist of a 400 x 500 well pad, improvement of 4,800 of a private road (William B Street) and construction of 1,112 of new access road. A bioretetion basin, which will also serve as a post-construction stormwater BMP, will be constructed near the northwest corner of the pad. Wetlands and two existing stream crossings are shown on the E&S plan along the private road upgrade from 12+00 - 19+00. The E&S plan notes that the wetlands between these stations are considered Exceptional Value (EV) wetlands. According to the E&S plan, the site drains to an unnamed tributary to Johnson Run, which is classified as a cold water fishery/migratory fishery (CWF/MF). As shown on the topographic map, the well site is located in an area that w |
| 2579409 | Primary Facility | 2017-04-05 | Preoperation Inspection | No Violations Noted | On Monday April 3, 2017 Johnny Pazzaglia called to report a ~5 gallon diesel spill near the monitoring well above the pad. I spoke with Woodward and Curran's Jordan Rathbun at the monitoring well (photo) who said an excavator removed the affected soil and contained it yesterday, and that a truck was the source of the diesel that leaked.
Repsol plans to spud the 1st well on this pad this week. I spoke with Johnny Pazzaglia, Repsol, on the phone. He said that they are waiting for the site to dry before they work on it. They plan to mulching/ seeding the slopes next week. A puddle on the pad gave a 0.90 mS/cm w/ an Oakton PCSTestr 35. |
| 2580347 | Primary Facility | 2017-04-07 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 2580350 | Primary Facility | 2017-04-07 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 2586535 | Primary Facility | 2017-04-25 | Incident- Response to Accident or Event | No Violations Noted | Pat Bower, Drilling Foreman, said Repsol is drilling the first of 5 Marcellus wells at this site, they are at a depth of about 800'.
Yesterday at 1708 hrs, Repsol called in a diesel fuel release that leaked from the saddle tank of a truck (photo). Randy Fish, Safety, showed me where the release occurred (photo). The fuel tank scraped on the access road, broke its strap, then the back of the tank scraped on the road and developed a breach on the bottom of the tank. Next they pumped out approx. 100 gallons from the 120 gallon tank. They estimate a maximum of 15-20 gallons of fuel released to the road. Bishops excavated the affected access road material, and used some absorbents, which is stored in red rolloff containers on the pad (photo). I used a MiniRAE 3000 PID to screen the area where the diesel leaked, the meter remained at 0.0 ppm the whole time. I did not observe any signs of residual fuel on site. |
| 2596480 | Primary Facility | 2017-05-23 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | I arrived on-site @ 13:10 hrs. and met Pat Bauer, Repsol company man. Patterson UTI rig 805 on location; the 04 well had been completed, and Mr. Bauer informed me that they would be spudding the 06 well within the next hour. There were 2 fairly large tears partway up the containment wall in the southwest corner of the pad; Mr. Bauer said he would have them repaired ASAP. I departed @ 14:00 hrs. |
| 2602102 | Primary Facility | 2017-06-08 | Routine/Partial Inspection | No Violations Noted | I spoke with Patrick Bauer, Foreman, who said they are drilling the 4th of 5 Marcellus wells on this pad. They are drilling with water to the kickoff point. I walked around the site with Randy Fish, Safety. A puddle on the pad gave a reading of 1.3 mS/cm with an Oakton PCSTestr 35. |
| 2602519 | Primary Facility | 2017-06-06 | Drilling/Alteration | No Violations Noted | |
| 2606925 | Primary Facility | 2017-06-22 | Routine/Partial Inspection | No Violations Noted | Tory Rogers (Safety), and I walked the perimeter of the pad, taking several EC readings with an Oakton PCSTestr 35. The highest reading was 1.5 mS/cm from a puddle near the pad entrance (photo). |
| 2654825 | Primary Facility | 2017-10-27 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | I met with company man Sheridan Anderson and Dave Coxhead on-site. Frac was active; currently zipper fracing the 2H and 4H wells. Sheridan estimated that the frac would be complete by 10/29. The Dyna Tank AST containment was free of water and appeared to be in good condition. Sitewide and secondary containments were also in good condition. Some water was present in various locations on the containment and the pad surface; all showed low conductance (less than .45 mS/cm). |
| 2659861 | Primary Facility | 2017-11-14 | Routine/Partial Inspection | No Violations Noted | I spoke with Rich Cashen (Repsol) who explained that a service rig with snubbing unit (photo) is drilling out plugs from the hydraulic fracturing job of the 5 Marcellus wells on site.
I got electrical conductivity readings from 3 puddles on the pad with an Oakton PCSTestr 35; the highest was 0.90 mS/cm. JLP |
| 2690525 | Primary Facility | 2018-02-02 | Routine/Partial Inspection | No Violations Noted | No electrical conductivity readings today, because there is no standing liquid on site. Air temp: 14F. JLP |
| 2713920 | Primary Facility | 2018-04-03 | Routine/Partial Inspection | No Violations Noted | I took electrical conductivity (EC) readings on site today with an Oakton PCSTestr 35, and a Hanna soil test. A puddle on the pad gave a 0.51 mS/cm reading. |
| 2741233 | Primary Facility | 2018-06-13 | Routine/Partial Inspection | No Violations Noted | I spoke with Travis Sterling (Repsol Well Tender) who was emptying liquid from the sandtraps into the wheelie trailer on site.
I took electrical conductivity readings with an Oakton PCSTestr35. A puddle on the pad was 2.2 mS/cm (photo 1). JLP |
| 2770300 | Primary Facility | 2018-09-04 | Routine/Partial Inspection | No Violations Noted | I took electrical conductivity readings with an Oakton PCSTestr 35. A puddle on the pad near the 4H well head returned a 0.11 mS/cm reading today. JLP |
| 2782858 | Primary Facility | 2018-10-02 | Routine/Partial Inspection | No Violations Noted | I took electrical conductivity readings with an Oakton PCSTestr 35. A puddle on the pad surface near the production tanks returned a 0.23 mS/cm reading today. JLP |
| 2840872 | Primary Facility | 2019-02-15 | Site Restoration | No Violations Noted | Repsol submitted a Well Site Restoration Report on January 28, 2019; it's accepted based on this inspection because the slopes around the pad appear stabilized by vegetation, and there is no temporary equipment on site.
I took electrical conductivity readings from pooled liquid with an Oakton PCSTEstr 35. A puddle near the production tanks returned 0.14 mS/cm. Air temp 45F, sunny. JLP |
For data sources see[8]