If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
| Well ID: 37-823145 | |
| Country: United States | |
| State: Pennsylvania | |
| County: Bradford | |
| Municipality: Columbia Township | |
| Operator Name: | |
| Well Pad ID: | |
| Farm/Lease Name: BELLOWS L (03-078) ALT ST | |
| License Status: | |
| Spud Date: | |
| Permit Date: | |
| Well Type: | |
| Unconventional Well: N | |
| Configuration: | |
| Conservation: | |
| Latitude: | |
| Longitude: |
| Inspection ID | Inspection Category | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2698049 | Primary Facility | 2018-02-23 | Routine/Partial Inspection | No Violations Noted | I met Jon Sassi of the DEP, Kris Perritt and Billy Watts of Repsol, and Andy Senefelder and Linse Stafford of Golder Associates when I arrived. Repsol had finished the hydrostatic testing of the 1 million gallon Dyna-Tank, and were sending the fresh water back to the Barrett impoundment at a rate of 900 Bbl per hour. Golder was on the site to routinely screen the water during the transfer to ensure the water quality being returned to the impoundment. The sample port had been set up on one of the hatches to the tank at approximately 42" off the bottom of the tank. A sample was screened every 5' the tank was drawn down; although a screening event wasn't due, Golder took a sample and demonstrated their screening method. A 1 liter jar was filled approximately 3/4 full from the sample port, and the water was examined for sheen. The sample was then screened for temperature, pH, and conductivity with a field meter. 31 feet of water remained in the tank; Billy estimated that it would take 26 hours to empty th |
| 2724038 | Primary Facility | 2018-04-26 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | I met Dave Coxhead and Sheridan Anderson of Repsol when I arrived. Pro Frac on site, performing a 4-well zipper frac. There were a number of puddles on the pad; conductivity of the puddles ranged from .144 to .230 mS/cm. Sitewide containment appeared to be in excellent shape. The DynaTank secondary containment had an interior berm approximately 4-5" high at 10-12' from the tank; Dave informed me that a small amount of salt collected at the compression rings on the tank, and the berm was there to segregate the potentially tainted water from precipitation in the rest of the containment. Conductivity inside the berm was 7.8-8.1 mS/cm, while outside the berm it was .19-.27 mS/cm. Overall, the site was clean and well maintained. |
For data sources see[4]